Cases

MICHAEL L. BROWN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *1254For the reasons below, the Court finds Claimant Cronos Agro, LLC has no valid PACA trust claim and overrules its objection to the Omnibus PACA Trust Chart. (Dkt. 441.) I. Background Defendants ABL Farms, Inc. and Southern Melon Distributors

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 03/13/2026 08:08 AM CDT - 953 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 320 Nebraska Reports HELZER FARMS V. ALLINGTON Cite as 320 Neb. 953 Helzer Farms, LLC, appellant, v. Jason Allingt

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFEN-DANTICOUNTERCLAIM PLAINTIFF GREEN ENERGY TEAM LLC’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON (a) COUNT I (BREACH OF CONTRACT) OF PLAINTIFF EVERGREEN ENGINEERING, INC.’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND (b) COUNT III (BREACH OF CONTRACT) OF GREEN ENERGY TEAM LLC’S COUNTERCLAIM LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI, District Judge. Before the Court is Defendant/Counterc

McAnany, J.: Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Insurance Company (Lumbermens) appeals from the judgment awarded to Evergreen Pallet, L.L.C. and Evergreen Recycle, L.L.C. (Evergreen) in the amount of $231,000 based on Evergreen’s claim that Lum-bermens improperly failed to pay a claim for losses associated with a fire in a commercial mulch pile owned and maintained by Evergreen. On ap

Evergreen Builder Sols., LLC v. Taylor, 2025 NCBC 77. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION NEW HANOVER COUNTY 25CV003575-640 EVERGREEN BUILDER SOLUTIONS, LLC, d/b/a EVERGREEN FOAM & INSULATION, a North Carolina limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND OPINION ON

OPINION AND ORDER RAMOS, District Judge. Dynamic Worldwide Logistics, Inc. (“Dynamic” or “Plaintiff’) brings suit against Exclusive Expressions, LLC (“Exclusive”), David Saad, and Joseph Saad (together with Dynamic, “Defendants”) for conversion and breach of contract. See Compl., Doc. 2. The parties entered into a contract in which Dynamic' promised to arrange for the transportation of le

ACCEPTED 15-25-00109-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/23/2025 5:08 PM NO. __-__-______-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; ORDER DENYING AS MOOT 1) DEFENDANT’S SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THE DOCTRINE OF RES IPSA LOQUITUR AND ANY SIMILAR THEORIES AND 2) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE: CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE UNDER STRICT PRODUCTS LIABILITY (“QUASI”-RESIPSA) KEVIN S.C. CHANG, United States Magistrate Judge.

Derrick K. Watson, United States District Judge *1327INTRODUCTION Irongate seeks summary judgment on the Sunday's Companies'1 remaining claims for breach of contract, conversion, and unjust enrichment, as well as on its own Counterclaim for breach of contract arising out of the failure o

OPINION Opinion by: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice This appeal concerns insurance coverage for re-drilling expenses under a Control of Well policy issued by Gemini Insurance Company and underwritten by Berkley Oil & Gas Specialty Services, LLC (collectively, “Gemini” unless otherwise stated). Drilling Risk Managemen

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of -- ) ) Parsons Evergreene, LLC ) ASBCA No. 58634 ) Under Contract No. FA8903-04-D-8703 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Douglas S. Oles, Esq. James F. Nagle, Esq.

OPINION GOULD, Judge: ¶ 1 ABCDW, LLC, Van Leeuwen Buckeye, LLC, Melanie Nevitt, LLC, and Pantano Banning, LLC (“Landlords”) appeal the superior court’s denial of their motion for judgment as a matter of law and motion for new trial on Lloyd E. Banning, Sr.’s counterclaims. They also appeal from the court’s grant of summary judgment for Banning on their statutory claim under Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S

The jury found that, as a consequence of the merger and JELD-WEN's conduct in 2014 and thereafter, competition was substantially lessened in the doorskin market and that, as a result, Steves sustained injuries of the type that the antitrust laws were designed to prevent. Thereupon, the jury awarded Steves $58,632,454.00 in antitrust damages which, when trebled as required by statute, amounts to antitrust damages in the amount of $175,897,362.00. The jury al

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 84661-2-I Respondent, DIVISION ONE v. PUBLISHED OPINION META PLATFORMS, INC., formerly doing business as FACEBOOK, INC., Appellant. DÍAZ, J. — “[A] well-informed electorate is as vital to the su

17‐1003‐cv Richards v. Direct Energy Servs., LLC UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2017 (Argued: April 11, 2018 Decided: February 4, 2019) No. 17‐1003‐cv

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GENNARO MATTIACCIO II, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 12-1249 (CKK) DHA GROUP, INC., et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (July 21, 2020) Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment for Lack of Standing, ECF N

ADKINS, J. In this case, we determine the proper measure of lost profit damages in a breach of contract case, a question uncommon for our docket. We also review the rare situation when a trial court has permitted a litigant to discover and introduce into evidence communications between an opposing party and its attorneys, based on an implied waiver of the attorney-client privilege via testimony. Finally, we answer four other

OPINION AND ORDER MICHAEL H. SIMON, District Judge. Spada Properties, Inc., doing business as United Salad Co. (“USC” or “Plaintiff’), *1075brings this action against Unified Grocers, Inc. (“Unified” or “Defendant”), alleging claims regarding the bankruptcy of a “Food 4 Less” grocery store to which both USC and Unified supplied groceries. Plain

OPINION AND ORDER HUBEL, United States Magistrate Judge: If ever there were a case where the Court hoped that the “parties [would just decide] to chill,” Mattel, Inc. v. MCA Records, Inc., 296 F.3d 894, 908 (9th Cir.2002), this would be it. Indeed, it is an understatement to say that this case has been hotly contested, or that there is some animosity between the two business competitors involve

Panel: Eyler, Deborah S., Berger, Fader, JJ. Berger, J. *52 *201 This appeal arises from a decision of the Montgomery County Board of Appeals (the "Board") granting an applicati