Cases

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WEXLER, District Judge. Plaintiff Veronique Hepler (“Helper”) filed this action on May 10, 2013 against defendants Abercrombie & Fitch Co. and Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., asserting a putative class action under the Fair Labor Standards Acts (“FLSA”) for unpaid overtime (First Claim), as well as supplemental state law class claims under New York Labor La

364 So.2d 1309 (1978) Earline FITCH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Delbert EVANS et al., Defendant-Appellee. No. 13657. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. October 30, 1978. Rehearing Denied December 13, 1978. *1310 Bruscato & Loomis by Albert E. Loomis, III, Monroe, for plaintiff-appellant. Kostel

In re Earline Fitch applying for writ of certiorari, Second Circuit Court of Appeal. Parish of Ouachita. 364 So.2d 1309. Writ denied. DIXON and DENNIS, JJ., would grant the writ.

Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Denying Defendants’ Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, United States District Court Judge. Pending before the Court are cross-motions for partial . summary judgment. Plaintiff U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) filed this ac*953tion

This is an appeal from a judgment entered in the Tiffin Municipal Court awarding the plaintiff-appellee, Roger Biller, the amount of $1,600 in a negligence action. The case originated with the filing of a complaint by the plaintiff against the defendant-appellant, Lorrie Booze Fitch, for damages sustained to an automobile operated by the plaintiff in a collision between the parties. On December 6, 1984, the trial court entered a consent judgment settling the case for the amount of $1,6

OPINION BOGGS, Circuit Judge. This case pits an old hand at trademark law against the new kid on the block: Abercrombie & Fitch sued American Eagle Outfitters to stop American Eagle from infringing what A & F describes as its unregistered “trade dress,” made protecta-ble by Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act. A & F claimed that AE impermissibly c

130 F.Supp.2d 928 (1999) ABERCROMBIE & FITCH STORES, INC., Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN EAGLE OUTFITTERS, INC., Defendant. No. C2-98-569. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. July 12, 1999. *929 Frank J. Colucci, Richard Jacobson, Courtney Monahan, W. Brant Mossop, Colucci & Umans, New York, NY, Melvin Don

939 F.Supp. 158 (1996) John W. EVANS v. GENERAL MOTORS CORP. No. 3:94cv197 (RNC). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. September 30, 1996. Karl R. Fink, Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery, Chicago, IL, Susan E. Dixon, Goring & Dixon, Winsted, CT, Annette M. McGarry, John P. Milnamow, Thomas E. Northrup, Dressler, Goldsmith, Shore & Milnamow, Chicago,

TIMOTHY S. HILLMAN, DISTRICT JUDGE Marjorie Y. Evans ("Plaintiff") brought this action against Staples Contract & Commercial LLC ("Staples") and Jessica Dagg ("Ms. Dagg") (collectively "Defendants") asserting that she was discriminated against on the basis of her race in violation of Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 151B and Title VII.1 Defendants moved to dismiss all claims for insufficient service of process an

OPINION CLAYTON, JUDGE: Laura Glodo appeals the Laurel Circuit Court’s decree awarding permanent custody of her- three minor children to Warren and Brenda Evans, the paternal grandparents. Michael Young, the father, waived custody of the three children. After careful consideration, we vacate, and remand since the .Evanses failed, to establish by clear and convincing evidence that Laura was an-

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 800 Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment entered by the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas disqualifying plaintiffs' counsel. The trial court disqualified plaintiffs' counsel because of a conflict of interest arising from his representation of defendants in a separate action pending in federal district court. P

851 So.2d 103 (2001) Jerry T. FITCH, Sr. v. STATE. CR-97-2284. Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama. August 31, 2001. Rehearing Denied December 14, 2001. *110 William J. Baxley and David McKnight, Birmingham, for appellant. William H. Pryor, Jr., atty. gen., and Stephanie N. Morman, asst. atty. gen., for a

PER CURIAM. This appeal presents a question about the outer boundaries of the statutory protection against non-party subpoenas in a civil case that New York has created for professional journalists, and the extent to which information-gathering organizations that are not traditionally considered part of the media may claim that privilege. Appellant Fitch, Inc., a financial ratin

939 F.Supp. 154 (1996) EVANS COOLING SYSTEMS, INC. and Patent Enforcement Fund, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Defendant. No. 3:94CV35 (RNC). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. September 30, 1996. Lewis K. Wise, Paul B. Zolan, Rogin, Nassau, Caplan, Lassman & Hirtle, Hartford, CT, Karl R. Fink, Fitch, Even, Tabin &

690 N.E.2d 350 (1998) Paul A. FITCH, Appellant-Plaintiff, v. Virginia I. MAESCH, Individually and as Special Administrator of the Estate of Hazel B. Canady, Deceased, and Warren Lee Fitch, Appellees-Defendants. No. 83A05-9610-CV-441. Court of Appeals of Indiana. January 13, 1998. *351 Keith L. Johnson, Johnson Simonson & Hime

428 F.Supp.2d 725 (2006) Melissa MITCHELL, Plaintiff, v. ABERCROMBIE & FITCH, CO. et al., Defendants, Casey FULLER,[1] Plaintiff, v. ABERCROMBIE & FITCH, CO. et al., Defendants. Nos. C2-04-306, C2-05-596. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. March 31, 2006. *726

113 B.R. 124 (1990) In re JONES & LAMSON MACHINE CO., INC., Debtor. Howard FITCH, Edward Tatnall, Ronald Erb, and Robert Whaley, Plaintiffs, v. JONES & LAMSON MACHINE CO., INC. and Textron, Inc., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 5-86-00762, Adv. No. 5-89-0060. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut. April 30, 1990. Paul T. Deignan, Bamberger & Feib

MICHEL, Circuit Judge. Evans Cooling Systems, Inc. and Patent Enforcement Fund, Inc. (collectively, “Evans”) appeal the September 30,1996 order of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut granting summary judgment to General Motors Corporation (“GM”) of invalidity based on the “on sale” bar under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b). The appeal was submitted for our deci

Adeline Fitch, the plaintiff and appellee, was married to Gail W. Fitch, the defendant and appellant, at Nevada, on October 27, 1919. Afterwards, they lived in Des Moines. This union brought forth a child, Caroline, now three and one-half years old. Discord arose between the father and mother, and the present suit for a divorce was instituted by the latter against the former on the statutory ground of inhuman treatment. As a result thereof, appellee was given: First, a decree of absolute divo

Montana, C.J. The Claimant filed its complaint against the State of Illinois on August 24, 1983. The original complaint sought $116,826.05 in damages based on a contract claim. The Claimant filed an amended complaint on March 28, 1984, seeking $127,417.25 in damages on its contract claim. Trial was held in this cause, the parties have fully briefed the issues, and Commissioner Robert Frederick has filed