Cases

NUMBER 13-16-00485-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG VICTOR MANUEL QUIJANO, Appellant, v. MARIA EUGENIA AMAYA, Appellee. On appeal from the 138th District Court

This appellant was found guilty by a jury of the offense of vagrancy. The complaint filed by the solicitor alleged that within twelve months before the commencement of this proceeding the defendant was a vagrant, against the peace and dignity of the State. The complaint was in code form, and sufficient. The demurrers thereto were properly overruled. Section 437, Title 14, Code of Alabama 1940; Hill v. State, 23 Ala. App. 451, 1

297 F.Supp.2d 1122 (2003) Rolf DIETRICH, Plaintiff, v. TREK BICYCLE CORPORATION, Defendant. No. 02-C-552-C. United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin. May 22, 2003. *1123 Eugenia G. Carter, Madison, WI, for Plaintiff. Keith D. Parr, Lord, Bissell & Brook, Chicago, IL, for Defendant. OPINION & ORD

SUSAN L. CARNEY, Circuit Judge: In this appeal, we consider whether venue for a criminal prosecution may lie pur*610suant to 18 U.S.C. § 3238, the “high seas” venue statute, when certain essential offense conduct is committed outside of the jurisdiction of the United States, but other offense conduct is committed within. We answer that it may. BACKG

894 So.2d 625 (2003) PROVIDIAN NATIONAL BANK et al. v. John SCREWS, Charles Richardson, and Gloria Shade. 1020668. Supreme Court of Alabama. October 3, 2003. William H. Brooks and William H. Morrow of Lightfoot, Franklin & White, L.L.C., Birmingham; and Courtney R. Potthoff of Williams, Potthoff, Williams & Smith, L.L.C., Eufaula, for appellants. J. G

ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO DISMISS (Docket Nos. 56 and 61) CLAUDIA WILKEN, District Judge. Lead Plaintiff Thomas J. Primo and Plaintiff Evan Powell (collectively, Plaintiffs) assert claims on behalf of a putative class and subclass, for various violations of the Securities Act of 1933, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Rules promulgated thereunder, against Defendants Pacific Biosciences of Cal

792 F.Supp. 1228 (1992) MARK Z., a minor by his parent and guardian as next friend, Plaintiff, v. MOUNTAIN BROOK BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 91-C-0581-S. United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, S.D. June 18, 1992. George W. Harris, Tuscaloosa, Ala., for plaintiff. Donald B. Sweeney, Jr. and Eugenia H. McGill, Rives & Peterson,

Petition for a writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia denied because of failure to submit the petition within the time prescribed by the rule.

WILKINSON, Circuit Judge: Three couples assert that North Carolina’s Senate Bill 2 (“S.B. 2”), which allows state magistrates to recuse themselves from performing marriages on account of a religious objection, violates the Establishment Clause. But the plain *516 tiffs, all of whom are either marrie

Matter of Richard JJ. (Jennifer II.) (2023 NY Slip Op 03738) Matter of Richard JJ. (Jennifer II.) 2023 NY Slip Op 03738 Decided on July 6, 2023 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant t

267 Cal.App.2d 389 (1968) JOHN A. WALLER, JR., Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Respondent, v. RUTH IRENE BROOKS, Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant. Civ. No. 31806. California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. Five. Nov. 13, 1968. Stapleton & Isen and F. G. Stapleton for Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant. Robert Winckler for Plaint

716 F.Supp.2d 1266 (2010) Donna Katz MAPLES, Plaintiff, v. UHS OF GEORGIA, INC., UHS of Georgia Holdings, Inc., and UHS of Peachford, L.P., doing business as Peachford BHS of Atlanta, Defendants. Civil Action No. 1:09-CV-01964-WEJ. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. May 3, 2010. *1267 Gary D. Hooper, Mo

723 S.E.2d 674 (2012) 290 Ga. 724 TAMPA INVESTMENT GROUP, INC. et al. v. BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, INC. Legacy Communities Group, Inc. et al. v. Branch Banking and Trust Company, Inc. Nos. S11G1728, S11G1729. Supreme Court of Georgia. March 19, 2012. *676 Chilivis, Cochran, Larkins &

PRESIDING JUSTICE LORENZ delivered the opinion of the court: On July 29, 1988, we filed our original opinion in this matter. Subsequently, we granted plaintiff-appellant’s motion for rehearing. The parties submitted additional briefs and we allowed additional oral argument on the motion. This appeal

MAXWELL, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. Angela Rigdon tried to attack two judgments in one motion for post-conviction relief (PCR), which the law does not permit.1 Further, we find it was plain from her motion, exhibits, and prior proceedings that she was not entitled to any relief.2 Thus, we affirm the circuit judge’s summary dismissal of Rigdon’s PCR motion.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SIDNEY B. BROOKS, Bankruptcy Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction .690 II. Summary.691 A. A Summary of this Opinion.691 B. The Enactment of 11 U.S.C. § 110 in the Reform Act of 1994 .692 C. The 2005 Amendments .693 D. The Unintended Consequences of 11 U.S.C. § 110.694

FULTON, District Judge. This cause was heard at 2:00 P. M., on September 2, 1965, in open Court on the motion of the defendant-counterclaimant, Patricia Semple Bunnell, for a summary judgment or decree, which, among other things, set forth that the record, which included the pleadings and admissions in the pleadings, the stipulation of facts in the pretrial stipulation and the consideration of the various exhibits, including

Filed 5/29/25; Modified and Certified for Partial Pub. 6/27/25 (order attached) COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, D082890 Plaintiff and Respondent, v. (Super. Ct. No. SCD274475) JOSHUA DAVID BARNUM, Defendant and Appellant.

25-210-cr United States v. Ross United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit AUGUST TERM 2025 No. 25-210-cr UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. GRACE ROSS, Defendant-App

349 F.Supp.2d 179 (2004) Angelo LOPEZ, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. CIV.A.2003-10916-RBC.[1] United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. December 20, 2004. *181 Joseph T. Desmond, Law Office of Dane Shulman, North Quincy, MA, for Angelo Lopez, Plaintiff. Eugenia M. Carris, United St