Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Eugene Horn”
Charles Eugene Horn v. Statepublic domain
In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
Charles Eugene Horn v. Statepublic domain
United States v. Eugene Hollow Horn Bearpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-3394 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Eugene Hollow Horn Bear
State v. Hornpublic domain
Review Denied.
State v. Hornpublic domain
Affirmed without opinion.
Horn v. Commissioner of Correctionpublic domain
ESPINOSA, J. **770 The issue that we must resolve in this appeal is whether the habeas court properly granted the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed by the petitioner, Vernon Horn. After a joint jury trial with his codefendant, Marquis Jackson, the petitioner was convicted of ten off
Luhnow v. Hornpublic domain
760 N.E.2d 621 (2001) Douglas and Beth LUHNOW, et al., Appellants-Plaintiffs, v. Eugene HORN, Donald R. Towne, Fulton County Surveyor, Steve Hartzler, Ron Jana and Art Showley, Commissioners, as Members, Fulton County Drainage Board, et al., Appellees-Defendants. No. 25A05-0106-CV-241. Court of Appeals of Indiana. December 20, 2001. *62
Horn v. Statepublic domain
ORDER PER CURIAM. Appeal from dismissal of Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
State of Arizona v. Rodney Eugene Hardypublic domain
OPINION PELANDER, Justice. ¶ 1 A jury found Rodney Hardy guilty of first degree burglary, kidnapping, and two counts of first degree murder. He was sentenced to death on both murder counts and to prison terms on the other counts. We have jurisdiction over his appeal under Article 6, Section 5(3) of the Arizona Constitution and A.R.S. § 13-4031 (Supp.2011
State v. Hornpublic domain
PER CURIAM: A jury found defendant Tommie Eugene Horn guilty of the sale of a schedule II controlled substance in violation of Missouri law. He appeals alleging that the trial court erred in overruling his motion for judgment of acquittal at the close of the evidence in that evidence did not warrant the submission of the case to the jury. On review, we consider the evidence, both direct an circumstantial,
People v. Hornpublic domain
Filed 4/28/21 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, G058168 v. (Super. Ct. No. 17NF1205) JACK JUNIOR HORN, OPINION Defendant and Appe
Horn v. City of Montgomerypublic domain
On June 21, 1992, at approximately 10:15 p.m., two City of Montgomery police officers saw the appellant, Leslie Wayne Horn, sleeping in his motor vehicle, which was parked at the curb on a public street in a residential section of the City of Montgomery. He was arrested and charged with violating City of Montgomery municipal ordinance number 29-59. The warrant of arrest filed in the municipal court charged him specifically with "sleeping or loitering in or on a motor vehicle." This or
Horn v. State Bd. of Examiners in Counselingpublic domain
Ferrell Horn, a licensed counselor, appeals from the circuit court's affirmance of a decision of the Alabama Board of Examiners in Counseling. The Board found Horn in violation of § 34-8A-16(a)(2), Ala. Code 1975; it suspended her license for one year and required her to successfully complete a graduate level ethics course. The Board further ordered that after Horn had successfully completed the course, her suspension would be stayed and she could re
People v. Terrence Kenneth Eugenepublic domain
The summaries of the Colorado Court of Appeals published opinions constitute no part of the opinion of the division but have been prepared by the division for the convenience of the reader. The summaries may not be cited or relied upon as they are not the official language of the division. Any discrepancy between the language in the summary and in the opinion should be resolved in favor of the language in the opinion.
Benjamin v. Hornpublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER Appellants, a class of pre-trial detainees at New York City jails, appeal the October 6, 2008, 2008 WL 4500689, decision of the district court (Baer, J.), terminating certain provisions of its April 26, 2001 order directing defendants the City of New York (the “City”) and the Department of Corrections (“DOG”) to remedy federal law-violations arising from environmental conditions in City jails. Appellants claim the
State of Missouri v. Eugene P. Campbellpublic domain
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION ONE STATE OF MISSOURI, ) No. ED110923 ) Respondent, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ) of St. Francois County ) Cause No. 1
Eugene Harbin v. Christopher Fisherpublic domain
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo ________________________ No. 07-18-00167-CV ________________________ EUGENE HARBIN, APPELLANT V. CHRISTOPHER FISHER, APPELLEE
Benjamin v. Hornpublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER Appellants, a class of pre-trial detainees at New York City jails, appeal the October 6, 2008, 2008 WL 4500689, decision of the district court (Baer, J.), terminating certain provisions of its April 26, 2001 order directing defendants the City of New York (the “City”) and the Department of Corrections (“DOG”) to remedy federal law-violations arising from environmental conditions in City jails. Appellants claim the
State v. Ronald Eugene Provostpublic domain
2020 WI App 21 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos.: 2018AP1268-CR, 2018AP1269-CR †Petition for Review filed Complete Title of Case: STATE OF WISCONSIN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V. RONALD EUGENE PROVOST,
Horn v. Rinckerpublic domain
MR. JUSTICE RYAN delivered the opinion of the court: The petitioners, Chester Horn and Rita Horn, were granted leave to file an original petition in this court requesting it to exercise its general administrative and supervisory authority and also praying for a writ of prohibition and for a writ of mandamus. Petit