Cases

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-08-251-CV LYDIA ESTHER RODRIGUEZ APPELLANT V. VICTOR MANUEL RODRIGUEZ APPELLEE ---------- FROM THE 211 TH DISTRICT COURT OF

i i i i i i MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-09-00101-CV Victor Manuel RODRIGUEZ, Appellant v. Lydia Esther RODRIGUEZ,

*202TEXTO COMPLETO DE LA SENTENCIA I Mediante la presente apelación se solicita la revocación de la sentencia de 8 de agosto de 1995, notificada con fecha de 29 de agosto de 1995, dictada por la Sala Superior de Ponce, del Tribunal de Primera Instancia, sentencia por la cual se anuló el reconocimiento de paternidad hecho por el apelado en relación con el menor

ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL X EMMANUEL ORENGO APELACIÓN acogida CRUZ, como CERTIORARI procedente del Tribunal Peticionaria, de Primera Instancia,

Criminal Case Template COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS ESTHER RODRIGUEZ, a/k/a ESTHER CAMPA RODRIGUEZ, a/k/a CAMPA, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS,

In a claim to recover damages for wrongful death, etc., the claimant appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Court of Claims (Mignano, J.), dated June 24, 2003, as granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the claim on the ground that the notice of intention and the amended notice of intention to file a claim failed to provide it with notice of the alleged negligence that caused the wrongful death. Ordered that

MEMORANDUM** Silvia Esther Rodriguez-Simo (“Rodriguez”) appeals her conviction for importation of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 960. She argues that the district court erred in denying her a downward adjustment for a minimal role in the offense under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2, that the statute under which she was convicted is unconstitutional, and that a finding of mens rea should be required for d

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Edgar J. Walker, J.), *340entered on or about January 24, 2007, which granted defendant Carney’s motion for summary judgment dismissing all claims against him, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Decedent Harris died from injuries sustained after the collapse of a parapet wall of a Bronx building owned by defendant American Impex. Carney leas

*180OPINION OF THE COURT Lee L. Holzman, J. The primary issue raised in this CPLR 3211 (a) (8) motion to dismiss the complaint is whether the Bronx County Surrogate’s Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to issue temporary limited letters of administration to the Public Administrator of Bronx County in the estate of a nondomiciliary alleged tortfe

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth L. Thompson, Jr., J.), entered July 18, 2005, which granted defendants’ motion and cross motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs. *269A notice of claim must provide sufficient information as to location (General Municipal Law § 50-e [2]) so that governmental authorities have an adequate opportunity to invest

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Louis C. Benza, J.), entered June 14, 2001, which, in an action for medical malpractice, granted defendant-respondent psychiatrist’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims as against him, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Plaintiff claims that respondent committed malpractice in failing to determine the cause of plaintiffs decedent’s agitation and pain before pres

FARMER, Judge. We conclude that no error in this appeal has been shown, save one. The guardian of the property, Colin K. Varnes, should be stricken from the decretal portion of the judgment. In all other respects, the final judgment for attorney’s fees and costs is affirmed. GUNTHER, C.J., and WARNER, J., concur.

FARMER, Judge. As in Rodriguez v. Yount, 672 So.2d 657 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), we remand with directions to strike the guardian of the property from the final judgment. Otherwise, we affirm. GUNTHER, C.J., and KLEIN, J., concur.

KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge, dissenting. If Rangel-Rodriguez wished to appeal the magistrate judge’s denial of his motion to the district court, he should have done so before the morning of trial. The district court did not abuse its discretion by refusing to reconsider the magistrate judge’s decision at that late date.

NUMBER 13-19-00625-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG IN RE ESTHER AKINDAYOMI, ET AL. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. ORDER Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Hinojosa and Tijerina Order Per Curiam

PER CURIAM. The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the order abating the cause of action is quashed. In short, there is not that commonality of parties and issues necessary in order to support the abatement of this medical malpractice action pending final appellate determination of a bad faith action against the insurance carrier of the negligent automobile driver who caused the initial injuries to appellant. See

NUMBER 13-19-00625-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG IN RE ESTHER AKINDAYOMI, ET AL. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Hinojosa and Tijerina Memorandum Opinion by Justice Tijer

HOWARD, Circuit Judge. Seeking monetary damages and prospective injunctive relief, several landowners brought a federal lawsuit against the mayor of Naranjito, Puerto Rico, for alleged violations of rights secured under the federal Constitution and commonwealth law. See 42 U.S.C. § 1983; 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a). The district court granted summary judgment for the m

George K. Cracraft, Judge. This is a Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act case in which the appellant, Esther Rodriguez, appeals from an order of the Sebastian County Chancery Court which refused full faith and credit to a prior order of the District Court of McLennan County, Texas, by which order custody of Gena Marie Saucedo, a minor, had been placed with her. The Arkansas court, in so refusing placed th