Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Esther Francis”
Esther Thompson v. Francis Keelingpublic domain
Vacate and Render and Opinion Filed January 6, 2020 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-01469-CV ESTHER THOMPSON, Appellant V. FRANCIS KEELING, Appellee On Appeal from the 134th Judicial Distr
ESTHER A. WILSON, ) ALEC WILSON, ) and ESTHER A. WILSON, ) as Personal Representative of the ) Estate of KELLI A. WILSON, deceased, ) ) No. SD35233 Plaintiffs-Appellants, ) Filed: January 9, 2019 ) vs. )
Estate of Esther Klieman v. Palestinian Authoritypublic domain
OPINION PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, United States District Judge Esther Klieman, an American schoolteacher, was killed in a terrorist attack in Israel in 2002. Her estate, survivors, and heirs have brought this action under Section 2333 of the Antiterrorism Act (“ATA”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 2331 et seq., and various tort theories, against the Palestini
Francis Brauner v. Shirley Coodypublic domain
EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge: A disabled Louisiana inmate sued several of his doctors and jailers, claiming they were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical condition in violation of the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment. The district court held perfunctorily that there was a genuine issue of material fact and denied qualified immunity, reje
Estate of Esther Klieman v. Palestinian Authoritypublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, United States District Judge On September 19, 2013, the Court ordered the British Broadcasting Corporation (the “BBC”) to provide to plaintiffs a copy of a 2003 BBC documentary and certain related outtakes, accompanied by one or more affidavits attesting to the authenticity of those materials. Order,
Estate of Esther Klieman v. Palestinian Authoritypublic domain
MEMORANDUM ORDER JOHN M. FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge. In my Memorandum Order [# 200] of May 15, 2013, I denied Plaintiffs’ Motion for Sanctions [# 195] insofar as it was premised upon the Palestinian Authority’s (“PA’s”) not appearing for the April 10, 2013 deposition. [# 200] at 3. I did not, however,
Francis v. District of Columbiapublic domain
731 F.Supp.2d 56 (2010) Thomas M. FRANCIS, Jr., Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 07-1473 (JDB). United States District Court, District of Columbia. August 18, 2010. *64 Woodley B. Osborne, Mehri & Skalet, PLLC, Robert C. Seldon, Robert C. Seldon & Associates, PC, Washington, DC, for
Diamond, Lesley Estherpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD-1299-18 LESLEY DIAMOND, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW AFTER OPINION ON REHEARING FROM THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HARRIS COUNTY Newell, J., delivered the opinion of the unanimous
381 S.C. 332 (2009) 673 S.E.2d 417 Thomas R. WIETERS, M.D., Petitioner, v. BON-SECOURS-ST. FRANCIS XAVIER HOSPITAL, INC., Allen P. Carroll, William B. Ellison, Jr., Jeffrey M. Deal, M.D., Sharron C. Kelley, and Esther Lerman Freeman, Psy. D., Defendants, of whom Bon-Secours-St. Francis Xavier Hospital, Allen P. Carroll, William B. Ellison, Jr., Jeffrey M. Deal, M.D., and Sharron C. Kelley are Respondents.
Lesley Esther Diamond v. Statepublic domain
Opinion dated May 3, 2018 Withdrawn, Motion for Rehearing Granted, Reversed and Remanded, and Majority and Dissenting Opinions on Rehearing filed September 11, 2018 In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00005-CR LESLEY ESTHER DIAMOND, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Cou
ANDERSON, J. In this action for defamation and civil conspiracy brought by Dr. Thomas R. Wieters (Wieters) against Bon-Seeours-St. Francis Xavier Hospital, Inc. (Hospital), Allen P. Carroll, Dr. William B. Ellison, Jr., Dr. Jeffrey M. Deal (Deal), and Sharron C. Kelly, Hospital and these individuals (collectively Hospital Personnel) appeal an order compelling discovery. Dr. Esther Lerman Freeman (Freeman) is a defendant but no
Lesley Esther Diamond v. Statepublic domain
Opinion dated September 11, 2018, Withdrawn, Motion for Rehearing Denied, Reversed and Remanded, and Substitute Majority and Substitute Dissenting Opinions filed October 23, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00005-CR LESLEY ESTHER DIAMOND, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Lesley Esther Diamond v. Statepublic domain
Opinion dated May 3, 2018, Withdrawn, Motion for Rehearing Granted, Reversed and Remanded, and Majority and Dissenting Opinions on Rehearing filed September 11, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00005-CR LESLEY ESTHER DIAMOND, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Francis v. Recycling Solutions, Inc.public domain
FERREN, Associate Judge: Esther H. Francis, in her capacity as Director of the District of Columbia Department of Public Works (DPW), brought suit in the Superior Court to vacate an order of the District of Columbia Contract Appeals Board (CAB). Instead of filing this suit against the CAB, however, Francis sued Recycling Solutions, Inc. (RSI), the prevailing party before the CAB. The trial court dismissed Francis’s complaint,
302 U.S. 746 58 S.Ct. 264 82 L.Ed. 576 LOUISIANA & ARKANSAS RAILWAY COMPANY, petitioner,v.Mrs. Esther FRANCIS.* No. 478. Supreme Court of the United States November 15, 1937 Messrs. A. L. Burford, of Te
Scott v. Francispublic domain
838 P.2d 596 (1992) 314 Or. 329 Esther SCOTT, Plaintiff, v. Peter D. FRANCIS; Patrick H. LePley; Jack J. Ackerman; Francis, Lopez & LePley, a partnership; and Francis, Lopez & Ackerman, a partnership, Defendants, Carl A. Taylor Lopez, Petitioner on Review, and Jay R. Jackson, Respondent on Review. CC A8412-07550; CA A46646; SC S37071. Supreme Court of Oregon.
Scott v. Francispublic domain
798 P.2d 1111 (1990) 104 Or.App. 39 Esther SCOTT, Plaintiff, v. Peter D. FRANCIS; Patrick H. LePley; Jack J. Ackerman; Francis, Lopez & Lepley, a Partnership; and Francis, Lopez & Ackerman, a Partnership, Defendants, Carl A. Taylor Lopez, Respondent, and Jay R. Jackson, Appellant. A8412-07550; CA A46646. Court of Appeals of Oregon, In Banc[*].<
Lesley Esther Diamond v. Statepublic domain
Opinion dated September 11, 2018 Withdrawn, Motion for Rehearing Denied, Reversed and Remanded, and Substitute Majority and Substitute Dissenting Opinions filed October 23, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00005-CR LESLEY ESTHER DIAMOND, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from
Scott v. Francispublic domain
WARREN, J., concurring in part, dissenting in part. I dissented in part in our original opinion. For the reasons stated there, I concur and dissent in part here. Joseph, Chief Judge, and Rossman and Deits, Judges, join in this concurring and dissenting opinion.
Sandra I. Correa v. Esther Salaspublic domain
Reverse and Remand; and Opinion Filed December 17, 2014 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-01478-CV SANDRA L. CORREA, Appellant V. ESTHER SALAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 429th Judicial Distric