Cases

ORDER KATHLEEN M. WILLIAMS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendants University of Miami (“UM”) and Dr. Nestor De La Cruz-Muñoz’s (“De La Cruz”) motion to dismiss amended complaint. (DE 49). Relator Beatriz Aquino obtained the Court’s leave to file an untimely response to the motion to dismiss. (DE 52). Defendants then filed a reply in support of the motion. (DE 58). F

USCA4 Appeal: 20-2330 Doc: 59 Filed: 01/25/2022 Pg: 1 of 72 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-2330 UNITED STATES EX REL. DEBORAH SHELDON, Executrix of the Estate of Troy Sheldon, United States of America, ex rel., Plain

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-2330 UNITED STATES EX REL. DEBORAH SHELDON, Executrix of the Estate of Troy Sheldon, United States of America, ex rel., Plaintiff – Appellant, v. ALLERGAN SALES, LLC, Defendant – Appellee. ------------------------------ UNITED STATES OF

LARRY R. HICKS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *1120Before the court is plaintiff BOKF, NA's ("BOKF") motion for a preliminary injunction. ECF No. 17. Defendants Robert Estes; Karen Miles; Jerry Carpenter; Shirley Carvey; and James and Becky Lynn Carpenter, as co-trustees of the Carpenter Family Rev Trust UAD 1/19/14, (collectively "defendants

MEMORANDUM OPINION JOHN D. BATES, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION .. .8 BACKGROUND.. .9 I. The Parties and Proposed Merger... 9 II. Original Medicare and Medicare Advantage.. .11 III. The Public Exchanges... 16 IV. Procedural History...

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER TOM S. LEE, District Judge. This cause is before the court on the motion of defendants United States of *840America, the United States Department of Homeland Security and Janet Napolitano, to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and pursuant

REGGIE B. WALTON, United States District Judge The plaintiff/relator, Chris Riedel, brings this qui tam action on behalf of the United States against the defendant, Boston Heart Diagnostics Corporation ("Boston Heart"), under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729 (2012). See Relator's Second Amen

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1793 Doc: 59 Filed: 03/13/2026 Pg: 1 of 38 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-1793 UNITED STATES EX REL. DEBORAH SHELDON, Executrix of the Estate of Troy Sheldon, United States of America, ex rel.,

MEMORANDUM OPINION REGGIE B. WALTON, United States District Judge The plaintiff/relator, Tina D. Groat, M.D., brings this qui tarn' action against the defendant, Boston Heart Diagnostics Corporation (“Boston Heart”), under the federal False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729 (2012), and various analog state false claims statutes. See Relator’s Second Amended Comp

318 F.3d 1199 UNITED STATES of America, ex rel. Mary L. HOLMES, Plaintiff-Appellant, andUnited States of America, Movant-Appellee,v.CONSUMER INSURANCE GROUP; John R. Hightower, Defendants. No. 01-1077. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. February 10, 2003. Craig D. Joyce, Walters & Joyce, P.C.,

Pre-award bid protest; Cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record; Standard of review — Bannum; Spoliation — GSA’s failure to maintain full record of procurement; Sanction imposed; Website information not incorporated into solicitation; Blue & Gold Fleet; Plaintiff did not waive claim that offer was timely; No patent ambiguity; Agency refusal to accept prop

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON PRIVILEGE CLAIMS ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge. The State of Texas seeks preclearance of its redistricting plans for the U.S. House of Representatives, State House of Representatives, and State Senate, pursuant to the Voting Rights Act of 1965, as amended (“VRA”), 42 U.S.C. § 1973 et seq.

MEMORANDUM BUCKWALTER, Senior District Judge. Currently pending before the Court is the Motion by Defendants CVS Caremark Corporation, Caremark RX, LLC, Care-mark, LLC, and Silverscript, LLC (collectively “Defendants”) to Dismiss Relator’s First Amended Complaint. For the following reasons, the Motion is denied in its entirety. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________ No. 18-1693 _______________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel. J. WILLIAM BOOKWALTER, III, M.D.; ROBERT J. SCLABASSI, M.D.; ANNA MITINA v. UPMC; UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH PHYSICIANS, d/b/a UPP DEPARTMENT OF NEUROSURGERY J. WILLIAM BOOKWALTER, III, M.D.; ROBE

520 F.Supp.2d 158 (2007) UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Robert R. PURCELL, Plaintiff, v. MWI CORPORATION and J. David Eller, Defendants. Civil Action No. 98-2088(RMU). United States District Court, District of Columbia. November 6, 2007. *159 *160 *161

MEMORANDUM OPINION (Denying Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss) Henry E. Hudson, United States District Judge THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant Marcelo S. Cuellar’s Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), filed on December 29, 2016. (ECF No. 8.) Both parties have filed memoranda supporting their respective positions. Oral argument followed on February 8, 2017-

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 25, 2021 Decided July 8, 2022 No. 20-7054 UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA 1974 PENSION PLAN, ET AL., APPELLEES v. ENERGY WEST MINING COMPANY, APPELLANT Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge WALD. WALD, Circuit Judge: D.J. Findley and Paxil Lazerson brought this qui tam action alleging that government employees’ clubs that earn revenue from vending services on federal property are violating the False Claims Act (“FCA” or “Act”), 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3733, by retaining monies owed to

MARCUS, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part1: Today this Court strikes down as unconstitutional a central piece of a comprehen*1329sive economic regulatory scheme enacted by Congress. The majority concludes that Congress does not have the commerce power to require un

*745 CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge: This appeal presents several constitutional challenges to the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729 et seq. The question of the constitutionality of the qui tam provisions is one of first impression in this circuit. We hold that these provi