⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Estes v. Airco Services, Inc.”

District Court, S.D. Florida · 2018-04-12 · Published · cited 10× · 311 F. Supp. 3d 1307
WILLIAM J. ZLOCH, Sr. United States District Judge THIS MATTER is before the Court upon Plaintiff Hamilton Group Funding, Inc.'s, Motion For Summary Judgment On Liability (DE 31) and Defendant Gerard Anthony Basel's Motion For Summary Judgment (DE 33). The Court has carefully reviewed said Motions, the entire court file and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. In the above-styled cause, Plaintiff Hamilton Gro
District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2014-11-25 · Published · cited 17× · 66 F. Supp. 3d 681; 2014 WL 7235086
ORDER (SEALED)1 LOUISE W. FLANAGAN, District Judge. This matter comes before the court on defendants’ motion for summary judgment (DE 6), and plaintiffs motion for permanent injunction (DE 17). Also before the court is plaintiffs response to the court’s order to show cause (DE 60) with respect to costs incurred in connection with defendant’s motion to compel (DE 4
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012-03-31 · Published · cited 11× · 867 F. Supp. 2d 153; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45795; 2012 WL 1114577
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF DEFENDANTS AMERICAN GUARANTEE AND LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY, ZURICH NORTH AMERICA COMPANY, BROWN & BROWN, INC., BROWN & BROWN OF CALIFORNIA, INC., AND CALSURANCE (DOCKET ENTRY #85); PLAINTIFFS’ CROSS MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOCKET ENTRY # 92); DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFFS’ CROSS MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOCKET ENTRY # 99); PLAINTIFFS’ AMENDED CRO
Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2026-05-27 · Published · cited 0×
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court John A. Tibbs and Margaret B. Tibbs, Respondents, v. 3M Company; 4520 Corp., Inc.; A.O. Smith Corporation; A. W. Chesterton Company; ABB Inc.; Air & Liquid Systems Corporation; AIW-2010 Wind Down Corp.; Amentum Environment & Energy, Inc.; Anchor/Darling Valve Company; Armstrong International, Inc.; Asbestos Corporation Limited ASCO, L.P.; Atlas Asbestos Co.; Atlas Turner, Inc.; AWT Air Company, Inc.; Bahnson, Inc.; Banner I
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2008-11-21 · Published · cited 6× · 899 N.E.2d 416; 387 Ill. App. 3d 262
899 N.E.2d 416 (2008) Nancy KEAN, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., Wal-Mart. Com, U.S.A., LLC, and Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., Defendants-Appellees (Chip Russell, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Intervenor and Plaintiff-Appellant; The Department of Revenue and Alexi Giannoulias as Treasurer of the State of Illinois, Intervenors and Defen
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2008-11-21 · Published · cited 0×
SIXTH DIVISION November 21, 2008 No. 1-07-1341 NANCY KEAN, Individually and on Behalf ) of All Others Similarly Situated, ) ) Plaintiff-Appellant, ) ) v.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990-09-24 · Published · cited 21× · 916 F.2d 85; 1990 WL 136606
*88OPINION OF THE COURT GREENBERG, Circuit Judge. This case raises a number of questions regarding the calculation of withdrawal liability under the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980 (“MPPAA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1381 et seq.: 1) How is an investment contract to be valued?
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990-10-22 · Published · cited 37× · 916 F.2d 85
916 F.2d 85 59 USLW 2221, 12 Employee Benefits Ca 2393 Ray HUBER, Edward L. Rees, Carl C. Huber, and James Bono asTrustees of the UFCW, Local 23 and Giant EaglePension Fund, Appellants at 89-3776,Cross-Appellees at 89-3780,v.CASABLANCA INDUSTRIES, INC., Cross-Appellants at 89-3780,Appellees at 89-3776. Nos. 89-3776, 89-3780. United States Court o
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1990-04-25 · Published · cited 3× · 114 B.R. 943; 1990 Bankr. LEXIS 1083; 1990 WL 69186
114 B.R. 943 (1990) In re SUBURBAN MOTOR FREIGHT, INC., Debtor. Stephen K. YODER, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. T.E.L. LEASING, INC., et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 2-87-00822, Adv. No. 2-87-0276. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio, E.D. April 25, 1990. *944 *945 Stephen K. Yoder, Bric
District Court, D. Maryland · 1981-09-25 · Published · cited 7× · 523 F. Supp. 1076; 32 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1559; 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9874
523 F.Supp. 1076 (1981) JARDINE, GILL & DUFFUS, INC. and Amstar Corporation v. M/V CASSIOPEIA, her engines, boilers, etc. and F.A. EMMAMAR, S.A. and/or F.A. Emamar, S.A. and FLENSBURGER REEDEREI A.G. VON 1961. Civ. A. No. M-78-1422. United States District Court, D. Maryland. September 25, 1981. *1077 John H. Skeen, Jr., David
Supreme Court of Alabama · 2018-07-27 · Published · cited 0× · 275 So. 3d 115
Judge James H. Anderson, Montgomery, as respondent. MENDHEIM, Justice. CGI Technologies and Solutions, Inc. ("CGI"), and Clinton Carter, in his capacity as Director of the Alabama Department of Finance, separately petition this Court for a writ of mandamus directing the Montgomery Circuit Court to dismiss, for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, an action filed by Jim Zeigler1 challen
Supreme Court of Alabama · 2018-07-27 · Published · cited 0× · 275 So. 3d 115
Judge James H. Anderson, Montgomery, as respondent. MENDHEIM, Justice. CGI Technologies and Solutions, Inc. ("CGI"), and Clinton Carter, in his capacity as Director of the Alabama Department of Finance, separately petition this Court for a writ of mandamus directing the Montgomery Circuit Court to dismiss, for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, an action filed by Jim Zeigler1 challen
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2012-11-16 · Published · cited 3× · 910 F. Supp. 2d 1291; 2012 WL 5830547; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 163828
OPINION AND ORDER CLAIRE V. EAGAN, District Judge. Now before the Court are the following motions: plaintiffs Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Dkt. # 37); Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment and Brief in Support (Dkt. # 39); and Defendants’ Cross Motion for Summary Judgment and Brief in Support (Dkt. #46). Plaintiff Pennsylvania Manufacturers’ Association Insurance Company (PMA) seeks
Glenn v. 3M Companypublic domain
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2023-04-05 · Published · cited 0×
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Rita Joyce Glenn, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Thomas Harold Glenn, deceased, Respondent, v. 3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co.; Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Individually and as Successor-In-Interest to Buffalo Pumps; Airgas USA, LLC; Aurora Pump; BW/IP Inc., a Subsidiary of Flowserve Corporation; CBS Corporation, a Delaware Corporation f/k/a Viacom, Inc., Success
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2023-03-09 · Published · cited 0×
EFiled: Mar 09 2023 08:00AM EST Transaction ID 69300274 Case No. 2022-0406-JTL IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE NEW ENTERPRISE ASSOCIATES 14, ) L.P., NEA VENTURES 2014, L.P., ) NEA:SEED II, LLC, and CORE ) CAPITAL PARTNERS III, L.P., )
Intermediate Court of Appeals of West Virginia · 2025-10-15 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA CLAY MUSIC CORP., Plaintiff Below, Petitioner v.) No. 24-ICA-457 (Cir. Ct. Kanawha Cnty. Case No. CC-20-2023-C-657) FILED MOUNTAINEER GAS COMPANY, Defendant Below, Respondent October 15, 2025 released at 3:00 p.m.
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007-12-31 · Published · cited 7× · 2007 Ohio 7145
OPINION {¶ 1} In these consolidated appeals, Robert Penn; John R. Hubbard; Marilyn Roth, individually, and as executor of the estate of James H. Roth, deceased; William A. Siegel; Mack Price; Herschel Ward; Robert L. Williams; and Edward Harrison, plaintiffs-appellants, appeal from judgments of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, in *Page 4 which the court, in eight separate ju
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010-01-25 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT HELLS CANYON PRESERVATION  COUNCIL, an Oregon non-profit corporation; and THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY, No. 07-35456 Plaintiffs-Appellants, v.  D.C. No. CV-02-01138-HA UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an OPINION agency of the United States Depar
King v. Knollpublic domain
District Court, D. Kansas · 2005-09-17 · Published · cited 4× · 399 F. Supp. 2d 1169; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28590; 2005 WL 3079096
399 F.Supp.2d 1169 (2005) Janice Lynn KING, Plaintiff, v. John J. KNOLL, Craig J. Spomer, and City of Topeka, Kansas, Defendants. No. 04-04149-JAR. United States District Court, D. Kansas. September 17, 2005. *1170 *1171 Janice Lynn King, Topeka, KS, pro se. Mary B. Mudrick, Legal Depar
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2000-01-07 · Published · cited 0×
7 January 2000 NO. 4-98-0911 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FOURTH DISTRICT CHARLES ED BOLAND, Personal ) Appeal from Representative of the ESTATE OF ) Circuit Court of ERIC J. VANDIVER, ) Vermilion County Plainti