Cases

In re Estelle, Robert C.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Orleans, Civil District •Court Div. D, No. 12-8630; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2014-CA-0108. Denied. HUGHES, J., would grant.

BARNES, Presiding Judge. Estelle Roberts and Charlie Smith appeal the trial court’s rulings on cross-motions for summary judgment in this dispute over an arrangement among four siblings to purchase a home for the benefit of one of the siblings. The trial court ruled in favor of Mary Smith, the executor of the estate of Johnnie Smith, who was one of the siblings, on all claims. For

MAX N. TOBIAS, JR., Judge. hThe plaintiff/appellant, Robert C. Estelle, appeals a trial court judgment upholding the constitutionality of La. R.S. 23:1600(5), in connection with his claim for unemployment benefits. After reviewing the record and applicable law, we also find that La. R.S. 23:1600(5) is rationally related to a legitimate state interest and, therefore, constitutional, thereby affirming the judgment below.

Order entered May 6, 2022 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00069-CV RENESHA O. GRIFFIN, Appellant V. ESTELLE VILLAGE, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Dallas County, Texas

640 F.Supp. 1146 (1986) Francisco Javier GUIZAR, Petitioner, v. Wayne ESTELLE, Respondent. Civ. No. 85-0033-B. United States District Court, S.D. California. August 5, 1986. Francisco Javier Guizar, CTF Soledad, No. 56102, in pro per, Soledad, Cal., for petitioner. Robert M. Foster, Deputy Atty. Gen., San Diego, Cal., for respondent. BREWSTER, District

*810 ORDER The opinion of this court, Henry v. Estelle, 993 F.2d 1423 (9th Cir.1993) and amended at 33 F.3d 1037 (9th Cir.1994), is vacated. Duncan v. Henry, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 887, 130 L.Ed.2d 865 (1995). The judgment of the district court is reversed. The petition for writ

Per Curiam; Dissent by Judge BRUNETTI. ORDER AMENDING OPINION and DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING and REHEARING EN BANC The opinion filed at 993 F.2d 1423 is amended as follows: [Editor’s Note: Amendments incorporated for purposes of publication]. Except for the above amendments, the petition for rehearing is denied and the suggestion for rehea

BRUNETTI, Circuit Judge: This is an appeal from a grant of habeas corpus by the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Petitioner Robert Henry contends that he was denied due process at his trial for child molestation because evidence of an uncharged crime was erroneously admitted and then followed by a jury instruction emphasizing that same eviden

PER CURIAM. Estelle Goings, Carol Vitalis, and Goings’s daughter worked in the payroll department within the Financial Accounting Office (FAO) of the Oglala Sioux Tribe. Goings supervised the entire office, and Vitalis supervised Goings’s daughter. The women obtained multiple payroll advances and failed to repay them as required by tribal policy. A grand jury found probable caus

JORDAN, Circuit Judge; We hold that an affidavit which satisfies Rule-56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure may create an issue of material fact and preclude summary judgment even if it is self-serving and uncorroborated. And because this principle- applies in all civil cases, including those in the realm of tax law, we overrule that portion of Mays v. United States, 763 F.2d 1295, 1297 (11th Cir

Case: 16-10914 Date Filed: 01/31/2018 Page: 1 of 16 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 16-10914 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:15-cv-

459 U.S. 1118 103 S.Ct. 757 74 L.Ed.2d 973 Robert Lee WHITE, petitioner,v.W.J. ESTELLE, Jr., Texas Department of Corrections No. 81-6937 Supreme Court of the United States January 10, 1983 On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of App

PER CURIAM: Robert Wayne Faulk and M.R. Ferguson were convicted of riot by arson in violation of the Texas Anti-Riot Law, V.T.C.A., Penal Code § 42.02 (1974). They petitioned for federal habeas corpus relief, charging that the statute is invalid on its face for overbreadth and vagueness, and because it imposes vicarious criminal responsibility on a basis too attenuated to satisfy constitutional concepts of personal guilt. Th

454 F.Supp. 943 (1978) John D. DOESCHER v. W. J. ESTELLE, Director, Texas Department of Corrections. No. CA3-77-584 F. United States District Court, N. D. Texas, Dallas Division. August 10, 1978. *944 Tedford E. Kimbell, Janet L. Babcock, Allen, Knuths, Cassell & Short, Dallas Tex., for plaintiff. John L. Hill, Atty. G

484 F.Supp. 230 (1979) Robert OWENS v. W. J. ESTELLE, Jr. No. SA-78-CA-375. United States District Court, W. D. Texas, San Antonio Division. May 10, 1979. *231 Robert Owens, pro se. Randy E. Drewett, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., for defendant. ORDER DISMISSING ACTION SUTTLE, District Judge. <

445 F.Supp. 647 (1977) Ernest Benjamin SMITH v. W. J. ESTELLE, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Correction, and Warden, Ellis Unit, Texas Department of Corrections. No. CA3-77-0544-F. United States District Court, N. D. Texas, Dallas Division. December 30, 1977. New Trial Denied March 27, 1978. *648

568 F.Supp. 1354 (1983) Guadalupe GUAJARDO, Jr., Allen Lamar, Ronald Kent Franks, James E. Baker, Thomas E. Hill, and Lawrence Pope, individually and on behalf of all present and future inmates of Texas Department of Corrections, Plaintiffs, v. W.J. ESTELLE, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 71-H-570. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Divisi

468 F.Supp. 42 (1978) Walter Lee BROWN, Petitioner, v. W. J. ESTELLE, Director, TDC, Respondent. Civ. A. No. CA-3-77-0905-D. United States District Court, N. D. Texas, Dallas Division. July 7, 1978. *43 *44 Walter Lee Brown, pro se. Joe Dibrell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Chief Enforcement Div.,

477 F.Supp. 932 (1979) John D. DOESCHER v. W. J. ESTELLE, Jr. No. CA 3-77-584-F. United States District Court, N. D. Texas, Dallas Division. August 31, 1979. *933 Tedford E. Kimbell, Janet L. Babcock, Allen, Knuths, Cassell & Short, Dallas, Tex., for petitioner. Douglas M. Becker, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., for re

93 Mich. App. 449 (1979) 287 N.W.2d 262 PEOPLE v. ESTELLE Docket No. 78-4724. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided November 6, 1979. Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, George N. Parris, Prosecuting Attorney, Don L. Milbourn, Chief Appellate Lawyer, and Robert John Berlin,</