Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Estella Mason”
NUMBER 13-15-00542-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG MASON CASTILLO, Appellant, v. CITY OF EDINBURG AND THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS–PAN AMERICAN, Appellees.
Newell v. Richardspublic domain
323 Md. 717 (1991) 594 A.2d 1152 ESTELLA NEWELL v. GEORGE J. RICHARDS, JR. ET AL. No. 121, September Term, 1990. Court of Appeals of Maryland. September 10, 1991. Motion for Reconsideration Denied October 24, 1991. Edward T. Pinder (William J. Blondell, Jr., William J. Blondell, Jr., Chartered, all on brief), Baltimore, for p
Newell v. Richardspublic domain
83 Md. App. 371 (1990) 574 A.2d 370 ESTELLA NEWELL v. GEORGE J. RICHARDS, JR., ET AL. No. 1579 September Term, 1989. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. June 6, 1990. As Amended August 8, 1990. William J. Blondell, Jr. (Edward T. Pinder and William J. Blondell, Jr., Chartered, on the brief), Baltimore, for appellant.
Perry v. Heirs at Law of Gadsdenpublic domain
357 S.C. 42 (2003) 590 S.E.2d 502 Alice C.G. PERRY, Emily Mitchell, Eliza Tremble, and Doris Green, Respondents, v. HEIRS AT LAW and Distributees OF Charles GADSDEN, C.H. Gadsden, Cecil S. Gadsden, C.S. Gadsden, Louise Gadsden, Cain Gadsden, John Gadsden, Lula Nelson, Louis Gadsden, Herman Gadsden, Carrie Gadsden, Estella Gadsden, Mattie Gadsden, United States Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration, South C
Perry v. Heirs at Law and Distributees of Gadsdenpublic domain
449 S.E.2d 250 (1994) Alice A.G.G. PERRY, Emily Mitchell, Eliza Tremble, and Doris Green, Respondents, v. HEIRS AT LAW AND DISTRIBUTEES OF Charles GADSDEN, C.H. Gadsden, C.S. Gadsden, Louise Gadsden, Cain Gadsden, John Gadsden, Lula Nelson, Louis Gadsden, Herman Gadsden, Carrie Gadsden, Estella Gadsden, Mattie Gadsden, United States Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration, South Carolina Electric & Gas Co., Hazel Point Partners
August 20, 2013 JUDGMENT The Fourteenth Court of Appeals GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING AND ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellants V. TAMMYLERN CURRY, RICHARD SZYMANSKI, ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF MARION SZYMANSKI, EMILIE WHITEHEAD, CONNIE BOHANNON, AND LINDA SCOTT, Appellees NO. 14-11-01093-CV NO. 14-12-00300-CV GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING AND ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellants V. ALVAREZ, CAROLYN B., AMAN, MARIA
PELL, Circuit Judge. The defendants appeal from their convictions for mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341 and making false statements in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001. The proof at their trials showed that the defendants received benefits from the Illinois Department of Public Aid (IDPA) after having made false statements abou
Beacon Mutual Insurance v. Spino Bros., Inc.public domain
OPINION The defendant, Spino Brothers, Inc. (Spino Bros, or defendant), appeals from a Superior Court grant of summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Beacon Mutual Insurance Co. (Beacon or plaintiff). The defendant argues that as a subcontractor it is not liable under an indemnification agreement to its general contractor for whom it performed masonry work, and further, that if it is found responsible, the plaintiff, as its insurer, is required t
Geisking v. Sheimopublic domain
105 N.W.2d 599 (1960) Estella GEISKING, Appellant, v. Erling Keith SHEIMO, Appellee. No. 50066. Supreme Court of Iowa. October 18, 1960. Brown, Dresser & Kinsey, Mason City, for appellant. *600 Boyle & Schuler, Clear Lake, for appellee. THOMPSON, Justice. The matter before us arises solely upon the pl
Texas Department of Transportation v. Arzatepublic domain
OPINION The Texas Department of Transportation appeals the trial court's denial of its plea to the jurisdiction pursuant to Section 51.014(a)(8) of the Texas Civil Practices and Remedies Code. See Texas Dep't of Transp. v. Jones, 8 S.W.3d 636, 638 (Tex. 1999) (holding that a governmental defendant may contest in a plea to the jurisdiction whether the State has waiv
234 F.2d 81 P. W. SIEBRAND & Hiko Siebrand, doing business as SiebrandBros., Circus and Carnival, Appellants,v.George F. GOSSNELL and Estella Gossnell, Appellees.S. J. CARROLL, Appellant,v.George F. GOSSNELL and Estella Gossnell, Appellees. No. 14468. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. May 23, 1956.
Salem Lodge No. 21, F. A.M. v. Swails, Exr.public domain
On November 7, 1921, Estella B. Prince received from the Mutual Life Insurance Company a fifteen-year endowment policy, for which she had made application, upon her life, payable to herself if living on November 7, 1936, and in the event of her death prior to said date, payable to her mother, Mary Boling. The absolute right to change the beneficiary was reserved in the policy by the insured. On July 18, 1924, there was attached to the policy, at the direction and request of Estella B. Prince,
Graham v. Ryersonpublic domain
96 Mich. App. 480 (1980) 292 N.W.2d 704 GRAHAM v. RYERSON Docket No. 78-4621. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided April 1, 1980. George A. Jones & Associates, for David and Estella Graham. *483 Butzel, Long, Gust, Klein & Van Zile (by Delmer C. Gowing, III), for Firestone
285 P.2d 847 (1955) PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. The CORPORATION COMMISSION of the State of Oklahoma et al., Defendants in Error (three cases). Estella M. HUMISTON, Plaintiff in Error, v. The CORPORATION COMMISSION of the State of Oklahoma et al., Defendants in Error. Nos. 36312, 36483, 36484, 36501. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. May 24,
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed August 20, 2013. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-11-01093-CV GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, LLP, Appellants V. TAMMYLERN CURRY, RICHARD SZYMANSKI, ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF MARION SZYMANSKI, EMILIE WHITEHEAD, CONNIE BOHANNON, AND LINDA SCOTT, Appellees On Appeal from the 215th District C
Sabon Investments, Inc. v. Braniff Airways, Inc.public domain
534 F.Supp. 683 (1982) SABON INVESTMENTS, INC. dba Gulliver's Travels, individually and as assignee of Norman P. O'Rielly, Thelma Watkins and Estella McConnell, Plaintiff, v. BRANIFF AIRWAYS, INC., a Nevada corporation, dba Braniff International, Defendant. No. CIV-81-535-TUC-ACM. United States District Court, D. Arizona. March 22, 1982.
Teague v. Johnson & Johnsonpublic domain
FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 11, 2014 Elisabeth A. Shumaker FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of Court VICKIE SCHMIDT PARSON; PATRICIA SCALES;
Welling v. Buckpublic domain
Null, J. This is an action by one claiming to be a citizen and taxpayer of the city of New York for a declaratory judgment to determine the validity of certain eligible lists for License No. 1 teachers. The original defendants, constituting the Board of Education of the City of New York and the Board of Examiners of the Board of Education of the City of New York, have moved for an order granting them declaratory judgment on the
Enright v. Gibsonpublic domain
Mr. Justice Ricks delivered the opinion of the court: This was a suit brought by appellee, Estella A. Gibson, against appellant, in the superior court of Cook county. The declaration consisted of two counts. The first count alleged false imprisonment, and the second, malicious prosecution. The cause was tried before a jury, and a verdict rendered for $5000, $2500 of which was
Perry v. HEIRS AT LAW & DISTRIB. OF GADSDENpublic domain
437 S.E.2d 174 (1993) Alice A.G.G. PERRY, Emily Mitchell, Eliza Tremble, and Doris Green, Respondents, v. HEIRS AT LAW AND DISTRIBUTEES OF Charles GADSDEN, C.H. Gadsden, C.S. Gadsden, Louise Gadsden, Cain Gadsden, John Gadsden, Lula Nelson, Louis Gadsden, Herman Gadsden, Carrie Gadsden, Estella Gadsden, Mattie Gadsden, United States Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration, South Carolina Electric & Gas Co., Hazel Point Partners