⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Espinosa v. Social Security Administration”

Espinosa v. Astruepublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2013-07-02 · Published · cited 36× · 953 F. Supp. 2d 25
MEMORANDUM OPINION ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, District Judge. Plaintiff Kevin Espinosa brings this áetion under the Social Security Act,. 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking a reversal of the Social Security Administration’s (“SSA”) denial of his claims for disability benefits and supplemental security income benefits. In the alternative, plaintiff seeks a re
District Court, District of Columbia · 2014-05-30 · Published · cited 0× · 46 F. Supp. 3d 1; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73532; 2014 WL 2256364
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, United States District Judge Plaintiff Wanda Kyler seeks judicial review pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) of the denial of social security disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) on November 2, 2012, following a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”). Pending before the Court are Plaintiffs
District Court, District of Columbia · 2014-05-30 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WANDA KYLER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civ. Action No. 13-0750 (ESH) ) COMMISSIONER OF ) SOCIAL SECURITY ) ADMINISTRATION,
District Court, District of Columbia · 2023-09-14 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA EMERY P., Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 21-cv-3147-MAU KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Emery
District Court, District of Columbia · 2022-07-26 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SHERRILLYN THEANELDA GRANT, Plaintiff, v. No. 21-cv-00526-ZMF KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Sherrillyn Theanelda Grant moves for reversal of Defendant Commissioner of
District Court, District of Columbia · 2021-12-17 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) KISHA SIMON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 17-2033 (RBW) ) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL ) SECURITY,
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021-01-06 · Published · cited 0×
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed January 6, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D20-265 Lower Tribunal No. 18-29633 ________________ Jesus Garcia,
Espinosa v. Astruepublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2013-08-22 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA KEVIN ESPINOSA, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 12-1348 (ESH) CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration, 1 Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Kevin
District Court, District of Columbia · 2016-12-28 · Published · cited 4× · 228 F. Supp. 3d 87; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 179116; 2016 WL 7468074
MEMORANDUM OPINION ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, United States District Judge Plaintiff Geraldine Campfield applied to the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) for disability benefits and supplemental security income benefits in 2012, claiming that she was disabled due to
District Court, District of Columbia · 2017-03-09 · Published · cited 26× · 239 F. Supp. 3d 203; 2017 WL 943900; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33445
ORDER TANYA S. CHUTEAN, United States District Judge Upon careful consideration of the record in this case, the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation filed on Feb. 17, 2017 (ECF No. 28), and the absence of any objections from either party thereto, the court hereby ADOPTS the Report of the Magistrate Judge and further ACCEPTS the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. It is therefore ORDERED that P
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005-08-05 · Published · cited 18× · 416 F.3d 834; 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 16156; 2005 WL 1844476
RILEY, Circuit Judge. Rosalie Grissom (Grissom) appeals the district court’s decision upholding the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration’s (Commissioner) denial of supplemental security income (SSI) benefits. We reverse and remand with instructions for the district court to remand the case to the Commissioner for further proceedings. I. BACKG
District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2014-07-16 · Published · cited 0× · 31 F. Supp. 3d 342; 2014 WL 3546086; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102054
OPINION AND ORDER JUSTO ARENAS, United States Magistrate Judge. I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On February 11, 2013, plaintiff filed this petition for judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security which denied her application for a period of disability and Social Security disability insurance benefits. (Docket No. 1). She filed a memorandum of law seek
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2026-08-13 · Published · cited 0×
NUMBER 13-25-00368-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG YODER FORD, INC., Appellant, v. ESMERALDA ESPINOSA, Appellee. ON APPEAL FROM THE 92ND DISTRICT COURT OF HIDALGO COUNTY, TE
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010-06-02 · Published · cited 83× · 607 F.3d 101; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 11151; 2010 WL 2179195
607 F.3d 101 (2010) Marco Tulio ESPINOSA-CORTEZ, Luz Marino Lopez-Tibaduiza, & Ximena Del Pilar Espinosa-Lopez, Petitioners v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF the UNITED STATES, Respondent. No. 08-4170. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued March 24, 2010. Opinion Filed June 2, 2010. *102 Peter M. Rogers,
District Court, District of Columbia · 2022-03-19 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA VRINDER SINGH RANDHAWA et al., Plaintiffs, v. No. 20-cv-3200 (DLF) DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al., Defendants. ORDER Vrinder Singh Randhawa alleges that the Department of Homeland Security mistreated him durin
New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997-06-20 · Published · cited 9× · 123 N.M. 605; 1997 NMCA 072
OPINION ARMIJO, Judge. 1. On October 22, 1991, Larry Espinosa was struck by a vehicle as he walked across an Albuquerque, New Mexico, street while in a designated crosswalk. The vehicle that struck Espinosa was owned by Albuquerque Publishing Company (the Company), and its driver was returning to his place of work after a “mail run.” It is undisputed that the accident w
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2016-05-10 · Published · cited 2× · 138 A.3d 212; 321 Conn. 259; 2016 WL 1749666; 2016 Conn. LEXIS 116
EVELEIGH, J. The plaintiff, Marian Pikula, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing her appeal from the decision of an administrative hearing officer for the defendant, the Department of Social Services (department), 1 denying her application for benefits under the state administered Medicaid pr
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2016-05-10 · Published · cited 0×
****************************************************** The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ‘‘officially released’’ date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ‘‘o
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-07-14 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00518-CV 6061835 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2014-06-17 · Published · cited 0×
****************************************************** The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ‘‘officially released’’ date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ‘‘o