Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Esmeralda Walker”
Esmeralda Velasco v. the State of Texaspublic domain
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth No. 02-24-00219-CR ESMERALDA VELASCO, Appellant § On Appeal from the 485th District Court § of Tarrant County (1683886) V. § August 14, 2025
Esmeralda Velasco v. the State of Texaspublic domain
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-24-00219-CR ___________________________ ESMERALDA VELASCO, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS On Appeal from the 485th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 1683886 Before Womack, Wallach, and Walker, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Walker
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS ESMERALDA DOMINGUEZ and MIGUEL § No. 08-23-00083-CV DOMINGUEZ, A/N/F ABRAHAM DOMINGUEZ, § Appeal from Appellants, § 171st Judicial District Court v.
In Re Esmeralda Gonzalez v. the State of Texaspublic domain
NUMBER 13-26-00426-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG IN RE ESMERALDA GONZALEZ ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Tijerina and Justices West and Cron Memorandum Opinion by Justice West 1
Esmeralda Granado v. Dillard Department Stores, Inc.public domain
Hayden v. Patersonpublic domain
594 F.3d 150 (2010) Joseph HAYDEN, Lumumba Akinwole-Bandelle, Wilson Andino, Gina Arias, Wanda Best-Deveaux, Carlos Bristol, Augustine Carmona, David Galarza, Kimalee Garner, Mark Graham, Keran Holmes, III, Chaujuantheyai Lochard, Steven Mangual, Jamel Massey, Stephen Ramon, Nilda Rivera, Mario Romero, Jessica Sanclemente, Paul Satterfield, Barbara Scott, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. David A. PATERSON, Governor of the State of New York, James A. Wal
Avina v. Cigna Healthplanspublic domain
Opinion GATES, J. In the instant appeal, defendants Cigna Healthplans of California, Cigna Hospital of Los Angeles, Dr. Charles Hunter, and Dr. Edward King challenge the orders of the trial court denying their petition to compel arbitration and their motion for reconsideration. The latter order resulted in an imposition of sanctions in the amount of $750 pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 128.5.
Contreras v. Lufkin Independent School Districtpublic domain
810 S.W.2d 23 (1991) Martina CONTRERAS, Individually and as Next Friend of Esmeralda Contreras, a Minor, Appellants, v. LUFKIN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Appellee. No. 09-90-065 CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Beaumont. May 30, 1991. Rehearing Denied June 20, 1991. *24 Richard Fischer, Nacogdoches, for appellant
Crystal Gregg v. Walgreen Co.public domain
Affirmed and Majority Opinion and Dissenting Opinion filed May 11, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-19-00335-CV CRYSTAL GREGG, Appellant V. WALGREEN CO., Appellee On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 2 Harris County, Texas Trial Co
Conway (Gary) Vs. Statepublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA GARY CONWAY, No. 75222 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. FILED SEP 1 2 2019
Andrew Lewis Trowbridge v. Statepublic domain
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-17-00136-CR ANDREW LEWIS TROWBRIDGE, APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE On Appeal from the 427th District Court Travis County, Texas
People v. Trajanopublic domain
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to the Illinois Official Reports accuracy and integrity of this
Hernandez was arrested for possession and distribution of cocaine after making multiple sales to an undercover police officer. The drug sales and the arrest occurred several miles from Hernandez's home. At the site of the arrest, the police confiscated $5,000 in currency and more cocaine from Hernandez and his automobile. Also at the time of the arrest, police obtained Hernandez's consent to search his home, and they conducted the search that same day. They did not recover any drugs o
Ricardo Barrera, M. D. v. Cesar Sarmientopublic domain
NUMBER 13-09-00094-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI<
Ricardo Barrera, M. D. v. Cesar Sarmientopublic domain
NUMBER 13-09-00094-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG RICARDO BARRERA, M.D., Appellant, v. CESAR SARMIENTO, ET AL., Appellees. On appeal from the 206th District Court of Hidalgo
United States v. Alarcon Sanchezpublic domain
18-671(L) United States v. Alarcon Sanchez 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 ____________________ 4 5 August Term, 2019 6 7 (Argued: August 27, 2019 Decided: August 27, 2020) 8 9 Docket Nos. 18-671, 18-1231 10 11 ____________________
Hayden v. Patakipublic domain
KATZMANN, Circuit Judge, dissenting. As a matter of public policy, I do not doubt that it may well be rational for the state to enact laws — applied fairly and equally, regardless of race, creed, color, religion or gender — that deprive felons of the right to vote while serving their sentences. At the same time, I am mindful that the task of a court is not to make policy or to substitute its views for that of polit
Total Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. Staffing, Inc.public domain
2023 IL App (1st) 220533 No. 1-22-0533 June 23, 2023 Sixth Division ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS
In Re Washington Mutual Finance, L.P.public domain
173 S.W.3d 189 (2005) In re WASHINGTON MUTUAL FINANCE, L.P., Fela Cavazos, David Gonzalez, Carmen Gonzalez, Rey Gonzales, and Adelaido Gonzales. No. 13-05-277-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi-Edinburg. August 26, 2005. *190 Melissa A. Prentice, Craig T. Enoch, Winstead, Sechrest & Minick, P.C., Austin, Brian T. Morris, W
In re Interest of Louis C.public domain
IN THE NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ON APPEAL (Memorandum Web Opinion) IN RE INTEREST OF LOUIS C. NOTICE: THIS OPINION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PERMANENT PUBLICATION AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY NEB. CT. R. APP. P. § 2-102(E). IN RE INTEREST OF LOUIS C., A CHILD UNDER 18 YEARS OF AGE. STATE OF NEBRASKA, AP