Cases

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT ERNEST HARRINGTON, ) DOC #H26139, ) ) Appellant,

In 1978, the plaintiff and defendant executed a separation agreement which contained the following language: Husband shall pay to wife one-fourth (1/4) of any net recovery to him after attorney's fees from any monies received by him as a result of potential malpractice claims arising from the treatment of his leg. *Page 378 Defendant's medical malpractice claim was settled in April, 1988 for $50,000.00. From

Opinion by Judge GRABER; Concurrence by Judge WATFORD. OPINION GRABER, Circuit Judge: The State of California authorizes the execution of a capital prisoner only after affording a full opportunity to seek review in state and federal courts. Judicial review ensures that executions meet constitutional requirements, but it also takes time — too much time, in Petitioner Ernest DeWayne Jone

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NOS. A-4742-17T4 A-4743-17T4 ERNEST BOZZI, Plaintiff-Appellant, APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION v. February 21, 2020

—Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing the complaint against defendants St. Mary’s Hospital and Maureen Gardner, R.N. following a jury verdict of no cause of action. We reject plaintiff’s contention that Supreme Court erred in submitting the case to the jury on the theory of medical malpractice rather than ordinary negligence. Plaintiff was a patient in the brain injury rehabilitation program a

HULL, Circuit Judge: Ernest Downs, a Florida death row inmate, appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition. This appeal involves only the guilt phase of Downs’s trial. Downs argues that his convictions for first degree murder and conspiracy to commit first degree murder were obtained in violation of the Constitution because (1) the State with

NO. 07-09-00182-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL E JULY 12, 2010 MICHAEL RUNNINGWOLF, APPELLANT v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE FROM THE COU

NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. DATE: 11/14/2023 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 14:.42:19 NON- COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr

274 F.3d 148 (4th Cir. 2001) DANIEL ADAMS; ROBERT C. ADKISSON; THOMAS W. ADLER; MATTHEW ALBRIGHT; KANYIA J. ANDERSON; BRADLEY D. ANTONS; LONNIE E. ARTIS; JAMES S. BAILIE; JOHN BANKS; JAMES R. BARKER; KAREN MARIE BARNES; CHARLENE A. BEAHM; JAMES T. BLOUNT; WILLIAM BRADY; LARRY D. BRENEMAN; FREDERICK M. BROCCOLO; MICHAEL B. CARDEN; WILLIAM R. CARMAN; WILLIAM H. CARROLL; MARC W. CHADWICK; DAVID CHERESKIN; ROBERT E. CHERRY; RICHARD CHILDRESS; MARK COLE

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge, dissenting: Ernest Perkins has raised eight independent challenges to his bank robbery conviction. The court rejects all eight and affirms the conviction. I concur in the court’s analysis in all respects but one; I am not persuaded that the district court’s change-of-appearance instruction, which everyone but the government concedes was improper,1 con

JAMES C. HILL, Circuit Judge: The International Longshoremen’s Association [ILA] struck appellees’ facilities over a work assignment to competing unions. Claiming a breach of contract, appel-lees sought and obtained a preliminary injunction against the ILA strike pending arbitration of the dispute. See Boys Markets, Inc. v

545 A.2d 645 (1988) CHAPMAN & DRAKE v. Granville HARRINGTON. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Argued May 5, 1988. Decided July 12, 1988. Jeffrey M. White, (orally), Pierce, Atwood, Scribner, Allen, Smith & Lancaster, Portland, for plaintiff. *646 James M. Bowie, (orally), Hunt, Thompson & Bowie, Portland, for d

ALBERT LEE STEPHENS, JR., District Judge. Several motions made after verdict are pending and a proposed form of Judgment has been submitted, to which objections are pending. These matters raise as a primary question, what is the “better practice” 1 for the District Court to follow in a case such as this in the light of the pronouncements of the Supreme Court and of the Court of Appeals for this,

MAGRUDER, Chief Judge. The only question on this appeal is whether .a lien of the United States for unpaid federal taxes, as applied to a vessel owned by the taxpayer, takes precedence over various maritime liens for supplies furnished to the said vessel. On February 11, 1954, Norlantic Diesel Inc. filed a libel in admiralty in the United States District Co

OPINION REX D. DAVIS, Justice In this accelerated appeal, Texas A&M University, Mark Hussey, Ph.D., in his official capacity as Interim President of Texas A&M University, and David Vaught, Ph.D., individually and in his official capacity as Department Head of the Department of History, appeal the trial court’s interlocutory order denying their plea

539 F.Supp. 17 (1981) CITY OF IRVING, TEXAS; Allene Harrington; Robert Harrington; and R. D. Harrington, Plaintiffs, v. FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION; J. Lynn Helms, Administrator of Federal Aviation Administration; C. R. Melugin, Jr.; City of Dallas, Texas; City of Fort Worth, Texas; DFW Regional Airport Board; Ernest E. Dean, Executive Director; Jack Downey, Deputy Executive Director; and, Michael T. Brock, Director of Operations; and Air Tra

Joan N. Feeney, United States Bankruptcy Judge I. INTRODUCTION The matter before the Court is the Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to which Stewart F. Grossman, the Chapter 7 Trustee of the bankruptcy estate of Connolly Geaney Ablitt & Willard, P.C. (the "Debtor" or the "Law Firm"),1 seeks summary judgment against the Defendant, Durham Commercial Cap

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR RULE 23(b)(2) CLASS CERTIFICATION CLAUDIA WILKEN, United States District Judge Consolidated Plaintiffs and Jenkins Plaintiffs, current and former collegiate athletes, jointly move for certification of injunctive relief classes. Defendants, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) and a group of Division I conferences, oppose the motion. After considering the parties’ subm

Per Curiam. ¶ 1. The formal complaint against respondent, Judge Ernest Balivet, alleged violations of Canon 3(B)(8) of the Vermont Code of Judicial Conduct. The Judicial Conduct Board concluded that respondent violated the canon and recommended a, sanction of a private letter of reprimand and conditions on the performance of judicial duties. This Court ordered review on its own motio

OPINION ZAPPALA, Justice. In this appeal, we are asked to review the Order of the Commonwealth Court affirming the determination of the Office of Hearings and Appeals of the Department of Public Welfare (OHA) 125 Pa.Cmwlth. 168, 557 A.2d 801 which rejected the hearing officer’s recommendation to expunge an indicated report of child abuse maintained under the Child Protective Services Law, 11 P.S. § 2201 et s