Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Ernest J Hall and Ernestine Hall”
in the Estate of Ernest Hodgespublic domain
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-20-00020-CV ___________________________ IN THE ESTATE OF ERNEST HODGES, DECEASED On Appeal from Probate Court No. 2 Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 2007-0003498-2 Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Wallach, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Wallach
LANELL E. DAROUSE * NO. 2024-C-0689 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL P.J.'S COFFEE OF NEW * FOURTH CIRCUIT ORLEANS, LLC AND NEW ORLEANS ROAST, LLC * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* ON SUPERVISORY WRIT FROM THE CIVIL DISTRICT COURT, ORLEANS PARISH NO. 2022-08499, DIVISION “F-14”
Cimarron Oil Corp. v. Howard Energy Corp.public domain
909 N.E.2d 1115 (2009) CIMARRON OIL CORP., an Illinois Corporation, Appellant, v. HOWARD ENERGY CORP., an Illinois Corporation, Appellee. No. 26A01-0902-CV-67. Court of Appeals of Indiana. July 24, 2009. *1116 J. Robert Kinkle, Hall, Partenheimer & Kinkle, Princeton, IN, Attorney for Appellant. John E. Rhine, Rhine Ern
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr
Clark v. Illinois State Board of Electionspublic domain
Illinois Official Reports Appellate Court Clark v. Illinois State Board of Elections, 2014 IL App (1st) 141937 Appellate Court FRANK CLARK, President and Chairman of the Board of the Caption Business Leadership Council; THE BUSINESS LEADERSHIP COUNCIL, KAREN RILEY, its Executive Director, and its Members, LEON FINNEY, ELZIE HIGGINBOTTOM, an
State of New Mexico v. Aamodtpublic domain
FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS November 9, 2018 Elisabeth A. Shumaker FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Cl
537 P.2d 682 (1975) 88 N.M. 74 FIRST NATIONAL BANK IN ALBUQUERQUE, as guardian for and on behalf of Dorothy Jean Huckleby, Charles Amos Huckleby, Ernestine Huckleby and Michael Huckleby, minors, Lois Huckleby, and Ernest Huckleby, Plaintiffs-Appellants, New Mexico Mill & Elevator Co., a corporation, and Ray Pritchett, each Individually and d/b/a Golden West Seed Co., Defendants-Appellants, v. NOR-AM AGRICULTURAL PR
Smithfield v. the Heirs of Hathawaypublic domain
1 Paul Filippi, Sr. is a named party in Plaintiff's original and Amended Complaint; however, he is not identified in the caption of Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint. 2 By stipulation of the parties in February of 2008, Marion Filippi was substituted as a defendant with her sons, Paul C. Filippi, Steven C. Filippi and Blake A. Filippi. <
Gilliam v. Hayespublic domain
FRED W. JONES, Judge. A husband and wife sued for damages for injuries allegedly sustained by the wife as the result of a battery committed upon her by an on-duty Shreveport police officer. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs against the City of Shreveport alone, the latter appeals, along with the Shreveport City Council and the two defendant police officers. We reverse. This suit was filed on M
Lockheed Martin Corp. v. Gordonpublic domain
16 S.W.3d 127 (2000) LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION, Appellant, v. August GORDON, Alfred Allen and wife, Mary Allen, Eddie Bennett and wife, Rosa Mae Bennett, Eddie J. Billingsley and wife, Arlene Billingsley, Willie J. Bolden and wife, Patricia Bolden, Oscar William Booker, Samuel Boswell and wife, Billie Ruth Boswell, Robert L. Brasfield and wife, Dorothy A. Brasfield, Dennis Brown, Individually and as personal Representative of The Estate of Port
Sparks v. Statepublic domain
412 So.2d 754 (1982) Freddie SPARKS v. STATE of Mississippi. No. 53130. Supreme Court of Mississippi. April 14, 1982. *755 Roy O. Parker & Associates, Nora J. Hall, Tupelo, for appellant. Bill Allain, Atty. Gen. by Robert D. Findley, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee. Before SMITH, P.J., and WALKER and
Chainey v. Streetpublic domain
523 F.3d 200 (2008) Nannie CHAINEY; Leroy Hampton, Jr.; Ernestine M. Rice; Trina McClain; Lynne Johnson; Teresa A. Grayer-Campbell; Cassandra Carter Johnston; Thomas Mapp Sr.; Betty Mapp H/W; Betty Mapp1; Ernest Hubbard; Esther Hubbard H/W; Esther Hubbard1; Robert Ford; Gwendolyn Ford H/W; Gwendolyn Ford1; Olaitan Odeniyi; Adeola Odeniyi H/W; Adeola Odeniyi1; Lucretia Wilson; Anne Lee; Gerald Renfrow; Constance Renfrow H/W; Virginia Cox; Hazel Taylor; Mi
People v. Wrightpublic domain
JUSTICE WELCH delivered the opinion of the court; The People of the State of Illinois appeal from the July 13, 1991, order of the circuit court of Wabash County vacating the guilty verdicts rendered on May 17, 1991, following jury trial on counts II, III, V, VII, VIII, IX, X, XIII, XV, and XVII of a 17-count indictment, against defendant, Richard O. Wright. In s
In re Estate of Brownpublic domain
PER CURIAM. These three appeals have been consolidated for disposition by this court. F.A.R. 2.2 (a) (2), 31 F.S.A. Appellants, Ernestine B. Lewis and Curtis E. Brown, seek review of certain orders of the County Judge’s Court of Osceola County entered in connection with the administration of the estate of their late father, Ernest Epps Brown. E. E. Brown was a pioneer settler of Osceol
State v. Reddickpublic domain
53 N.J. 66 (1968) 248 A.2d 425 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JOSEPH REDDICK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued October 8, 1968. Decided December 17, 1968. Mr. Louis Santorf argued the cause for defendant-appellant. Mr. Archibald Kreiger, Assistant County Prosecutor, argued the ca
United States v. Barberpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT ALDISERT, Circuit Judge. Before us are seven appeals from convictions resulting from an attack upon two agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.1 The four-count indictment charged the defendants with (1) assault, or aiding and abetting an assault, with a dangerous weapon (a shoe) upon special agent Frank W. Grant, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 111; (
Chainey v. Streetpublic domain
Opinions of the United 2008 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 4-14-2008 Chainey v. Street Precedential or Non-Preceden
New Mexico ex rel. State Eng'r v. Carsonpublic domain
John W. Utton, Utton & Kery, P.A., Santa Fe, New Mexico, filed an answer brief and a supplemental brief on behalf of Santa Fe County. Marcos D. Martinez, Santa Fe, New Mexico, filed an answer brief and a supplemental brief on behalf of the City of Santa Fe. Larry C. White, Santa Fe, New Mexico, filed a response brief and a supplemental brief on behalf of the Rio de Tesuque Association, Inc. Scott B. McEl
New Mexic Ex Rel. State Eng'r v. Carsonpublic domain
John W. Utton, Utton & Kery, P.A., Santa Fe, New Mexico, filed an answer brief and a supplemental brief on behalf of Santa Fe County. Marcos D. Martinez, Santa Fe, New Mexico, filed an answer brief and a supplemental brief on behalf of the City of Santa Fe. Larry C. White, Santa Fe, New Mexico, filed a response brief and a supplemental brief on behalf of the Rio de Tes