Cases

ORDER In accordance with the Supreme Court’s opinion of June 26, 2013 as well as the resulting judgment, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The clerk is directed to issue the mandate forthwith.

602 F.3d 976 (2010) Kristin M. PERRY; Sandra B. Stier; Paul T. Katami; Jeffrey J. Zarrillo, Plaintiffs-Appellees, and City and County of San Francisco, Intervenor-Plaintiff, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, in his official capacity as Governor of California; Edmund G. Brown, Jr., in his official capacity as Attorney General of California; Mark B. Horton, in his official capacity as director of the California Department of Public Health and state reg

*1154ORDER Having considered all of the factors set forth in Nken v. Holder, - U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 1749, 1756, 173 L.Ed.2d 550 (2009), and all of the facts and circumstances surrounding Plaintiffs’ motion to vacate the stay pending appeal, as well as the standard for vacatur set forth in Southeast Alaska Conservation Council v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 472

671 F.3d 1052 (2012) Kristin M. PERRY; Sandra B. Stier; Paul T. Katami; Jeffrey J. Zarrillo, Plaintiffs-Appellees, City and County of San Francisco, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edmund G. BROWN, Jr., in his official capacity as Governor of California; Kamala D. Harris, in her official capacity as Attorney General of California; Mark B. Horton, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health & State

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Andrew Pampu, Appellant-Respondent, v. Erin Wingo, David Wingo, and Colin J. Gahagan, Respondents-Appellants. Appellate Case No. 2022-001332 Appeal From Pickens County Perry H. Gravely, Circuit Court Judge Opinion No. 6112 Heard March 13, 2025 – Filed June 11, 2025 AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED Kimberly C. Lau and James E. Figliozzi, both

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge, joined by BYBEE and BEA, Circuit Judges, dissenting from the order denying rehearing en banc: A few weeks ago, subsequent to oral argument in this case, the President of the United States ignited a media firestorm by announcing that he supports same-sex marriage as a policy matter. Drawing less attention, however, were his comments that the Constitution l

IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2021 WY 137 OCTOBER TERM, A.D. 2021 December 14, 2021 ERIN E. INNES, n/k/a ERIN E. LEMMONS, Appellant (Defendant), v. S-21-0124 KYLE E. INNES, Appellee (Plaintiff). Appeal from the Distri

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS ELEAZER M. MASIMULA, § No. 08-24-00084-CV Appellant, § Appeal from the v. § 383rd District Court BETHANY ERIN MASIMULA, § of E

If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS ERIN KOSCH, FOR PUBLICATION August 22, 2024 Plaintiff-Appellant,

Andrea R. Wood, United States District Judge Plaintiff Keith Perry is a man over the age of forty formerly employed by the Illinois Department of Human Services ("DHS"). Perry claims that during his time at DHS, he endured discrimination based on his age and sex and was retaliated against for asserting his rights. Consequently, Perry brought this lawsuit against DHS pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act ("Title VII"), 42 U.S

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS FILED CHRISTOPHER F., March 9, 2016 Petitioner Below, Petitioner released at 3:00 p.m. RORY L. PERRY, II CLERK

ORDER REINHARDT, Circuit Judge. Shortly before the hearing of this appeal, the defendants-intervenors-appellants (“Proponents”) requested that I recuse myself under 28 U.S.C. § 455(a) and § 455(b)(5)(ni). Under § 455(a), I must recuse myself if “a reasonable person with knowledge of all the facts would conclude that [my] impartiality might reasonably be q

975 F.Supp. 418 (1997) David E. PERRY, Michael Kelleher, Lucille A. Sasso, Joyce C. Dube, William Aliferakis, William T. Laferriere, Gerald J. Griffin, Doreen R. Bowen, John J. Martino, Joseph Conley, Marguerite Dipalma, Cheryl Witt, Susan Ryan Froment, Barbara Brooks, F. Charles Haigh, Dennis Revens, Kenneth Haupt, and Arlene Maloney, Plaintiffs, v. STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, Lincoln Almond, in his Capacity as Chief Executive Officer of The State of

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE October 18, 2016 Session ERIN ALFORD FULLER v. ROGER DARNELL FULLER Appeal from the Chancery Court for Bradley County No. 2014-CV-272 Jerri S. Bryant, Chancellor No. E2016-00243-COA-R3-CV-FILED-DECEMBER 21, 2016 This appeal stems from a divorce action involving, inter alia, issues of proper valuation of a ma

04/22/2022 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 11, 2022 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MARCUS ROSHONE PERRY Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2017-A-193 Steve R. Dozier, Judge ___________________________________

ORDER CERTIFYING A QUESTION TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA Before this panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is an appeal concerning the constitutionality under the United States Constitution of Article I, § 7.5 of the California Constitution (“Proposition 8”). Because we cannot consider this important constitutional question unless the appellants before us have standing to raise it, and in light of

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS State of West Virginia, FILED Plaintiff Below, Respondent November 18, 2016 RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK vs) No. 15-1195 (Berkeley County 14-F-191) SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS

WHITE, J., delivered the opinion of the court in which MOORE and SUTTON, JJ., joined in part. ,MOORE, J. (pp. 216-18), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting from the court’s opinion regarding matchmaking duties. SUTTON, J. (pp; 218-20), delivered a ’ separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting from the court’s opinion 1 ■ regarding sales duties. OPINION

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 8, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-19-00447-CV MARCUS A. TOWNLEY AND ERIN M. MCCAIN, Appellants V. LINDA A. LANIER, Appellee On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 4 Harris County, Texas Trial Court C

639 F.3d 1153 (2011) Kristin M. PERRY; Sandra B. Stier; Paul T. Katami; Jeffrey J. Zarrillo, Plaintiffs-Appellees, City and County of San Francisco, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edmund G. BROWN, Jr., in his official capacity as Governor of California; Kamala D. Harris, in her official capacity as Attorney General of California; Mark B. Horton, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health & State