Cases

ORDER Navor Fragozo-Soto pleaded guilty to being in the United States without permission after being deported. See 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He appeals, but his appointed lawyer believes the case is frivolous and seeks leave to withdraw. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Fragozo-Soto did not respond to counsel’s motion. See Cir. R. 51(b). The lawyer’s supporting brief is

ORDER Navor Fragozo-Soto pleaded guilty to being in the United States without permission after being deported. See 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He appeals, but his appointed lawyer believes the case is frivolous and seeks leave to withdraw. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Fragozo-Soto did not respond to counsel’s motion. See Cir. R. 51(b). The lawyer’s supporting brief is

Matter of Sinopidis v Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J. (2019 NY Slip Op 00830) Matter of Sinopidis v Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J. 2019 NY Slip Op 00830 Decided on February 5, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department Publ

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS ———————————— No. 08-26-00244-CV ———————————— In the Matter of the Marriage of Luis Acuna and Erika Quiroz On Appeal from the 383rd District Court El Paso County, Texa

Segarra Olivero, Juez Ponente *66TEXTO COMPLETO DE LA SENTENCIA El Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala Superior de San Juan, dictó sentencia condenatoria contra el apelante, William Soto Beníquez, por el delito de Asesinato en Primer Grado y otros delitos relacionados con la infracción de la Ley de Armas de Puerto Rico, 25 L.P.R.A. see. 411 et. seq.

922 A.2d 1252 (2007) 191 N.J. 240 Ronald A. MacKINNON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Erika MacKINNON, Defendant-Respondent. Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued May 1, 2007. Decided June 11, 2007. *1253 Michele E. D'Onofrio, Warren, argued the cause for appellant (DiFrancesco, Bateman, Coley, Yospin, Kunzman, Dav

OPINION OF THE COURT Faviola Soto, J. This written decision amplifies on my decision of July 16, 1996, whereby defendant’s motion to dismiss was denied. The defendant is charged with operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 (2) and (3). Both the defendant and the People have submitted well-researched and argued papers, and the defendant ha

20 A.3d 384 (2011) 206 N.J. 243 Joseph A. DONELSON, Plaintiff, and John Seddon, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DUPONT CHAMBERS WORKS, Defendant-Respondent, and Paul Kaiser, Defendant. A-112 (065628). Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued December 1, 2010. Decided June 9, 2011. *385 Nancy Er

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS MVT SERVICES, LLC, and JUAN GARCIA, § No. 08-23-00181-CV Appellants, § Appeal from v. § 448th Judicial District Court ERIKA ROB

275 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2001) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, Appellee,v.JALIL GAZIR SUED-JIMENEZ, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, Appellee,v.ELGA MARI CASTRO-RAMOS, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, Appellee,v.ELLIOT VICENTE CASTRO-TIRADO, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, Appellee,v.JOSE LUIS ROMERO-BURGOS, Defendant, Appellant.

LYNCH, Circuit Judge. After a six-day trial, a federal jury convicted co-defendants Doris Morel and Erika Tomasino of conspiracy and multiple fraud-related counts based on their participation in a multi-year tax-return fraud scheme. Each was sentenced to three years in prison. On appeal, Morel challenges her conviction with only a Batson jury claim. Tomasino adopts

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION Honorable Jim D. Pappas, United States Bankruptcy Judge Introduction In this chapter 131 case, the Court is called upon to address complicated dueling motions to modify a confirmed plan. The first motion was filed by Debtors Jose Luis Alonso and Erika Molina Alonso, Dkt. No. 89; the other was filed by the chapter 13 trustee

746 F.Supp.2d 877 (2010) V. Erika SMITH, Ph.D., et al., Plaintiffs, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES LAKELAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE, et al., Defendants. Case No. 09-CV-2604. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. September 28, 2010. *883 James L. Hardiman, Robert Smith, III, Cleveland, OH, for Plaintiffs. James A. Hoga

*69 BALMER, C. J. This case arises from a helicopter crash in a remote part of Peru, which resulted in the deaths of everyone on board. Plaintiffs brought wrongful death actions in Oregon against Evergreen Helicopters, Inc. (Evergreen), an Oregon corporation that provided the helicopter and the pilot. Ever

IN THE Indiana Supreme Court Supreme Court Case No. 25S-PL-141 FILED Indiana Land Trust #3082 and Omar and Haitham Feb 24 2026, 11:04 am Abuzir as Trustees CLERK Indiana Supreme Court

Justice ALBIN, dissenting. Today’s ruling sends a disturbing signal to both the business community and the bar that employee theft may actually pay. In this case, during a deposition, Curtiss-Wright Corporation learned that plaintiff—'who had an ongoing lawsuit against the company— was continuing to steal (photocopy) confidential documents while retaining her position of trust in the company. Curtiss-Wright disc

In this case we must determine whether, under a homeowners insurance policy's terms, an insurer has a duty to defend and indemnify an insured's potential liability for damages resulting from limestone mining operations conducted on the insured's property. Neighboring property owners sued Ruth Hallman ("Hallman") for damages related to limestone mining on her property. Hallman sought coverage under her homeowners insurance policy ("the policy") with Allstate Insurance Company ("Allstat

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS JUAN DAVID ORTIZ, § No. 08-23-00025-CR Appellant, § Appeal from the v. § 406th Judicial District Court THE STATE OF TEXAS, § of

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MI FAMILIA VOTA; et al., No. 24-3188 Plaintiffs - Appellees, D.C. No. v. 2:22-cv-00509- SRB ADRIAN FONTES, in his official District of capacity as Arizona Secretary of Arizona, State; et al., Phoenix Defendan

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS RICARDO MARQUEZ, § No. 08-22-00177-CR Appellant, § Appeal from the v. § 409th Judicial District Court THE STATE OF TEXAS, §