Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Erik Christian”
Pinkston, Erik Christianpublic domain
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL P.O. BOX 12308^g^OJ^|^T|IO,N,.Aygr OFF8C8AL BUSINESS .*-- "• STATE OF Til-*^4-^5: PENALTY FOR 02 1R 12/15/20ll^»VATE USE ^$t 0006557458 DEC 1 7 2014 PINKSTON, ERIK CHRISTIAN^t?.^t!<S^SI^r^W^J8g5PS422i9eE 78701 WR-81,741-02 \ ' -,%:'" On this day, the supplemental clerk's reco
Pinkston, Erik Christianpublic domain
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78X1 ©FFSC1AL BUSINESS STATE OF TE FEMALTY FOR 02 1R 1/14/2015 FmVATEySE K 0002003152 JAN15 2015 £ MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 78701 PINKSTON, ERIK CHRISTIAN
Pinkston, Erik Christianpublic domain
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS STATE ©F TEXAS PENALTY FOR 02 1R PROVATEUSE ;.-* 0002003152 JAN15 2015 1/14/2015 to. MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 78 701 PINKSTON, ERIK CHRISTIAN " * Tr.'Ct.
Pinkston, Erik Christianpublic domain
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL P.O. BOX 12308^^13^^j^AI^QN A^Sj: OFFICIAL BUSINESS STATE OF Til§cAtu 'Df PENALTY FOR , 12/15/201 fWVATEUSE ^ PINKSTON, ERIK CHRISTIAN' TrT'Ct. NorC-372-0l0l56-08T54f7-Al WR-81,741-01 ... On this day, the supplemental clerk's.recbrd.'jn response to the order issued by this Court, has been received and presenteS to the Court. . ?:;
Pinkston, Erik Christianpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NOS. WR-81,741-01 AND WR-81,741-02 EX PARTE ERIK CHRISTIAN PINKSTON, Applicant ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NOS. 0815417D AND 0815422D IN THE 372ND DISTRICT COURT FROM TARRANT COUNTY Per curiam. ORDER Pursuant to the provisions of Article
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 18a0206p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT TREE OF LIFE CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS, ┐ Plaintiff-Appellant, │ │
OPINION NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge: Challenging the district court’s procedural rulings, Calvary Christian Center of Fredericksburg, Virginia, contends that the district court abused its discretion in denying its motion for leave to amend its complaint, which was filed after the court *538
CALVARY CHRISTIAN CENTER v. City of Fredericksburgpublic domain
800 F.Supp.2d 760 (2011) CALVARY CHRISTIAN CENTER, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF FREDERICKSBURG, Defendant. Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-342-JAG. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. July 18, 2011. *764 Matthew Devane Fender, McGuire Woods LLP, Richmond, VA, Erik William Stanley, * *Na* *Pro Hac, Vice, Alliance Def
Calvary Christian Center v. City of Fredericksburgpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION JOHN A. GIBNEY, JR., District Judge. In this case, the plaintiff, Calvary Christian Center (“Calvary”), challenges the denial of a special use permit by the defendant, the City of Fredericksburg (“City”). Calvary seeks the special use permit to lease church space to the operator of a private day school for disabled children. Calvary alleges violations of the Americans with Di
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 16a0122p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ TREE OF LIFE CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS, ┐ Plaintiff-Appellant, │
OPINION AND ORDER GEORGE C. SMITH, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the parties cross-motions for summary judgment. (See Docs. 79 and 82). Responses have been filed and the motions are now ripe for review. For the reasons that follow, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment and DENIES Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment. I. BACK
OPINION AND ORDER GEORGE C. SMITH, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendant the City of Upper Arlington’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 36), Plaintiff Tree of Life Christian Schools’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 64), and Defendant’s Second Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 65). Responses and replies have been filed and these motions are now ripe for review. For the reaso
In Re: Erik Brunettipublic domain
Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge Dyk. MOORE, Circuit Judge. Erik Brunetti appeals from the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”) affirming the examining attorney’s refusal to register the mark FUCT because it comprises immoral or scandalous matter under 15 U.S.C. § 1052(a) (“§ 2(a)”). We hold substantial evidence supports the Board’s
Ronnie Long v. Erik Hookspublic domain
ON REHEARING EN BANC PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-6980 RONNIE WALLACE LONG, Petitioner – Appellant, v. ERIK A. HOOKS, Secretary, NC Dep't of Public Safety, Respondent – Appellee. ------------------------------ THOMAS ALBRIGHT, Professo
Matter of Christian M. (Jill L.)public domain
Matter of Christian M. (Jill L.) (2019 NY Slip Op 07072) Matter of Christian M. (Jill L.) 2019 NY Slip Op 07072 Decided on October 2, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting
Proa v. NRT Mid Atlantic Inc.public domain
608 F.Supp.2d 690 (2009) Sean PROA, et al., Plaintiffs v. NRT MID ATLANTIC INC. et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. AMD 05-2157. United States District Court, D. Maryland. April 20, 2009. Clayborne E. Chavers, The Chavers Law Firm PC, Patrick J. Massari, Law Office of Patrick J. Massari, Washington, DC, Sheryl Satzberg Levy, William Thaddeus
State v. Erik Virgil Hallpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket Nos. 31528/41059 STATE OF IDAHO, ) ) Plaintiff-Respondent, ) ) v. ) ) ERICK VIRGIL HALL, ) ) Boise, August 2017 Term
S., CHRISTIAN J., MTR. OFpublic domain
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Jefferson County (Richard V. Hunt, J.), entered March 27, 2014 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10. The order determined that respondent had neglected her children and continued custody of the children with their father. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, and t
Whitlaw El v. Christianpublic domain
FILED MAY 1 6 2012 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Courts for the District of Columbia
United States v. Westonpublic domain
55 F.Supp.2d 23 (1999) UNITED STATES of America v. Russell Eugene WESTON, Jr., Defendant. Criminal Action No. 98-357(EGS). United States District Court, District of Columbia. June 18, 1999. Ronald Walutes, Erik Christian, David Goodhand, Assistant United States Attorneys, Washington, DC, for plaintiff. A.J. Kramer, Federal Public Defender, L. Barrett Boss, As