Cases

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

SUBSTITUTE OPINION THE COURT’S PRIOR OPINION DATED APRIL 13, 2017, IS HEREBY WITHDRAWN GUTIERREZ, Judge Rick A. Erickson appeals from the district court’s order of dismissal of Erickson’s intermediate appeal from the magistrate. Erickson argues the district court erred in several respects, including denying Erickson thirty-five days to file his appellant’

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MATTHEW F. KENNELLY, District Judge: Plaintiff Elbert Williams, a prisoner in the Illinois Department of Corrections, has asserted claims under federal and state law against Danielle Erickson and Wex-ford Health Sources, Inc. arising from his contention that he was repeatedly refused assistance in changing his colostomy bag over a four hour period. Defendants moved to

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MATTHEW F. KENNELLY, District Judge: Plaintiff Elbert Williams, a prisoner in the Illinois Department of Corrections, has asserted claims under federal and state law against Danielle Erickson and Wexford Health Sources, Inc. arising from his contention that he was repeatedly refused assistance in changing his colostomy bag over a four hour period. Defendants have

OPINION SMITH, JOHN, Judge We affirm the judgment entered on a creditor’s suit that pierces the corporate veil to hold appellant personally liable for a judgment entered against a corporation in a previous action because the district court correctly (1) rejected appellant’s argument that recovery was barred by the creditor’s failure to exhaust remedies, laches, and unclean hands; (2) applied offensive col

Armstrong, J. ¶1 Victor and Larry Erickson brought a quiet title action against Charles and Nancy Chase to establish prescriptive easements over two unpaved roads on the Chase property, the Lower Road and the Upper Road. The Skamania County Superior Court granted the Lower Road easement, denied the Upper Road easement, and found the Ericksons liable for timber trespass. The Ericksons appeal the trial court’s rulings denying the U

601 F.3d 683 (2010) ADVERTISING SPECIALTY INSTITUTE, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross Appellee, v. HALL-ERICKSON, INC., d/b/a The Motivation Show, and National Premium Show, Inc., d/b/a The Motivation Show, Defendants-Appellees/Cross Appellants. Nos. 08-1097, 08-1227. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued September 21, 2009. Decided April 7, 2010.

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff-appellee to file an answer in excess of the page limitation is GRANTED. The 58-page answer submitted on March 20, 2018, is accepted for filing.

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendants-appellants to extend the *258time for filing their reply is GRANTED. The reply will be accepted for filing if submitted on or before April 20, 2018.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 12, 2017 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

782 F.Supp.2d 1163 (2011) Matt ERICKSON, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF LEAVENWORTH, Defendant. No. CV-11-007-RHW. United States District Court, E.D. Washington. May 4, 2011. *1166 Matt Erickson, Wenatchee, WA, pro se. Michael C. Walter, Amanda Gabrielle Butler, Keating Bucklin & McCormack Inc. PS, Seattle, WA, for Defendant.</

CROTHERS, Justice. [¶ 1] Richard Dregseth appeals the district court’s judgment dismissing his equitable claims against Randy Brown. Dreg-seth argues the district court erred by (1) failing to make findings of fact in compliance with N.D.R.Civ.P. 52(a)(1), (2) failing to reject Brown’s testimony and (3) dismissing Dregseth’s promissory estoppel, equitable estoppel and unjust enrichment claims. We affirm.

ORDER David S. Doty, Judge United States District Court This matter is before the court upon the motion for a preliminary injunction by plaintiff David Erickson. Based on a review of the file, record, and proceedings herein, and for the following reasons, the court denies the motion. BACKGROUND This securities dispute arises out of the proposed merger of defendant Hutch

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY CASE AND COMPEL ARBITRATION ROBERTO A. LANGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This case involves an insurance contract between Plaintiff Raymond Erickson and a fraternal benefit society. Insurance contracts issued by a fraternal benefit society generally include the society’s bylaws, as well as any subsequent amendments to

MEMORANDUM & ORDER GORTON, District Judge. The instant case arises from a construction site accident in Waltham, Massachusetts in October, 2009. The injured party has sued three entities for negligence,- one of whom has moved to dismiss the claim against it for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. That motion is currently pending before the Court. I. Background At

SUTTON, Circuit Judge. What's down in the well, it's said, comes up in the bucket. The National Labor Relations Board concluded that Erickson Trucking Service, a unionized crane-rental company in western Michigan, unlawfully fired several employees due to a labor union's activities on their behalf. We agree, most notably because that's how the company explained the matter to the dischar

Ronayne Krause, J. *370 Acting as personal representative and successor trustee, respectively, of the estate and trust of his deceased father Reginald Smith (decedent), plaintiff, David Smith, appeals as of right the trial court's order granting defendants summary disposition under MCR 2.1

ORDER * The above appeals have been consolidated for briefing, argument and decision. Cause No. 00-35994 is an appeal from a summary judgment dismissing Moxley’s claims of copyright infringement and related causes of action. It appears to us that the undisputed facts considered by the district court demonstrate that Moxley has authored material which is not copyrightable. The judgment w

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice. [¶ 1] John D. Erickson, Richard B. Dregseth, and Jon A. Ramsey (collectively *39“plaintiffs”) appealed from a district court judgment dismissing before trial some of their claims against Randy Brown and Capital Harvest, Inc., and dismissing their remaining claims after a jury verdict in an action to determine the plaintiffs’ right to an owners

DEVORE, J. Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board determining that claimant has a compensable “combined condition,” as defined in ORS 656.005(7)(a)(B). Employer contends that the board erred in its interpretation of the medical evidence that employer offered to meet its burden under ORS 656.266(2) to show that claimant’s combined condition is not compensable. We review the board’s order for substa