⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

12 opinions for “Erica A Kirkwood”

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017-03-14 · Published · cited 17× · 851 F.3d 1029; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 4431; 2017 WL 971782
KELLY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-Appellant Suture Express, Inc. appeals from the district court’s entry of *1033 summary judgment in favor of Cardinal Health 200, LLC (“Cardinal”) and Owens & Minor Distribution, Inc. (“O&M”) under Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act, Section 3 of the Cl
District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018-09-25 · Published · cited 1× · 344 F. Supp. 3d 906
Honorable Thomas M. Durkin, United States District Judge Plaintiff FameFlynet Inc. ("FFN") brings a copyright claim against defendant Jasmine Enterprises, Inc. for alleged infringement of FFN's copyright in three photographs of Nicky Hilton and James Rothschild taken at their July 10, 2015 celebrity wedding ("the Hilton-Rothschild Photos"). Currently before the Court is FFN's motion for summary judgment as to liability [58]. For the
District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2019-01-23 · Published · cited 11× · 362 F. Supp. 3d 651
STEPHEN N. LIMBAUGH, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter comes before the Court on defendant Century International Arms' *655motion for summary judgment (# 55) and Dunham Athleisure Corp.'s motion for summary judgment (# 58). These motions have been fully briefed. For the reasons explained below, this Court will
District Court, D. South Carolina · 2013-09-13 · Published · cited 1× · 972 F. Supp. 2d 804; 2013 WL 5231522; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 131516; 120 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 130
ORDER R. BRYAN HARWELL, District Judge. Plaintiff Stacey Langley (“Plaintiff’) filed the above action against her former employer, Dollar General Stores (“Defendant”), alleging gender discrimination, *808quid pro quo sexual harassment, sexually hostile work environment, and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Tit
Supreme Court of Florida · 2005-04-21 · Published · cited 29× · 901 So. 2d 802; 2005 WL 914193
901 So.2d 802 (2005) Erica TYNE, etc., et al., Appellants, v. TIME WARNER ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY, L.P., etc., et al., Appellees. No. SC03-1251. Supreme Court of Florida. April 21, 2005. *803 Stephen J. Calvacca of Law Office of Calvacca Moran, and W. Edward McLeod, Jr., Winter Park, FL; Jon J. Mills and Timothy McLendon, Gainesvil
Greene v. Statepublic domain
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1971-01-29 · Published · cited 29× · 273 A.2d 830; 11 Md. App. 106; 1971 Md. App. LEXIS 412
11 Md. App. 106 (1971) 273 A.2d 830 CLAYTON MAURICE GREENE v. STATE OF MARYLAND. No. 7, September Term, 1970. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. Decided January 29, 1971. *107 The cause was argued before MURPHY, C.J., and ANDERSON, MORTON, ORTH, THOMPSON, and POWERS, JJ. William F. Gosnell,
District Court, D. Kansas · 2012-01-18 · Published · cited 9× · 846 F. Supp. 2d 1177; 2012 WL 138607; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5518
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER KATHRYN H. VRATIL, District Judge. The administrator of the estate and the children of Terry Albert Bruner, a former inmate at the Sedgwick County Adult Detention Facility in Wichita, Kansas, filed suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 to recover money damages for the violation of Bruner’s rights under the Eighth Amendment. In particular, plaintiffs allege that various individuals
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018-03-27 · Published · cited 2× · 886 F.3d 1179
O'Malley, Circuit Judge. *1185 This copyright case returns to us after a second jury trial, this one focusing on the defense of fair use. Oracle America, Inc. ("Oracle") filed suit against Google Inc. ("Google") 1 in the United
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2022-06-17 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 21–0856 Submitted February 23, 2022—Filed June 17, 2022 PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND, INC., and JILL MEADOWS, M.D., Appellees, vs. KIM REYNOLDS ex rel. STATE OF IOWA and IOWA BOARD OF MEDICINE, Appellants. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Johnson County, Mitchell E. Turner, Judge. In a case challenging the constitutionality of a law mandating
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2022-06-17 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 21–0856 Submitted February 23, 2022—Filed June 17, 2022 PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND, INC., and JILL MEADOWS, M.D., Appellees, vs. KIM REYNOLDS ex rel. STATE OF IOWA and IOWA BOARD OF MEDICINE, Appellants. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Johnson County, Mitchell E. Turner, Judge. In a case challenging the constitutionality of a law mandating
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2022-06-17 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 21–0856 Submitted February 23, 2022—Filed June 17, 2022 Amended August 24, 2022 PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND, INC., and JILL MEADOWS, M.D., Appellees, vs. KIM REYNOLDS ex rel. STATE OF IOWA and IOWA BOARD OF MEDICINE, Appellants. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Johnson County, Mitchell E. Turner, Judge. In a case chall
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2014-12-31 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 04-14-00829-cv 04-14-00829-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXA