Cases

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-22-00514-CV David W. Roark, Appellant v. Rice Capital, LLC Series 20, Appellee FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. C-1-CV-21-005487, THE HONORABLE ERIC SHEPPERD, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION In t

17 A.3d 408 (2011) Kelly WARMKESSEL, Appellee v. Eric HEFFNER, Appellant. No. 879 MDA 2010. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted November 29, 2010. Filed March 10, 2011. *410 Roarke T. Aston, Reading, for appellant. John T. Adams, Reading, for appellee. BEFORE: STEVENS, GANTMAN, and FITZGERALD<

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ________________ NO. 09-21-00026-CV ________________ ERIC NARZYNSKI, Appellant V. RIVER PLANTATION COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION, Appellee ______________________

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-12-00371-CV MORGAN JACKSON APPELLANT V. ERIC JENNINGS KISIAH APPELLEE ---------- FROM THE 141ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 18, 2021. In the Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-18-00496-CV ERIC HOOD A/K/A TIM SACKETT, Appellant v. CIT BANK, NA, Appellee On Appeal from the 152nd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Cour

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS ERIC B. DARNELL, Individually. and § ERIC B. DARNELL, P.C., § Appellants, 08-17-00067-CV § v. Appeal from the

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: Texas sued the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") and the Attorney General ("Defendants"), challenging EEOC's guidance on employers' use of criminal records in hiring. Texas alleged that guidance constituted an unlawfully promulgated substantive rule and sought to enjoin its enforcement. The state also asked for a declaration per the Declaratory Judgment Act ("DJA") that it could lawfull

KIM R. GIBSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. Introduction This case arises out of a train derailment that occurred near Hyndman, Pennsylvania in August 2017. Plaintiff Denora Diehl ("Plaintiff") filed a Class Action Complaint alleging that Defendant CSX Transportation, Inc. ("Defendant") negligently operated its train, causing it to derail. Plaintiff avers that she and other proposed class members

{¶ 53} Mr. Minno suffered terrible injuries as the result of his accident. It is natural to be sympathetic toward him. A jury has yet to decide to what extent, if any, See-Ann is liable to Mr. Minno for his injuries. However, this does not allow us, as a court, to misapply theBelvedere test in order to find Pro-Fab "fundamentally *Page 18 indistinguishable" from See-Ann, a separate corporate entity and Minno's employer, when

MEMORANDUM OPINION HOLLIS HORTON, Justice We issued our original memorandum opinion in this cause on August 27, 2015, and afterwards, the appellant and the ap-pellees filed motions for rehearing. The court denies the motions for rehearing; however, the panel withdraws its opinion and judgment and issues this opinion and judgment in their stead.

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT BAINBRIDGE INVESTOR, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, Appellant, v. SCHECHTER OPERATING CAPITAL, LLLP, a Florida Limited Liability Limited Partnership; BAINBRIDGE HOLDINGS I, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company; SCHECHTER CAPITAL, LLLP, a Florida Limited Liability Limited Partnership, and PHILIP TSITSE

72 F.Supp.2d 739 (1999) Eric TAPP, Plaintiff, v. David BANKS, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 98-180. United States District Court, E.D. Kentucky. October 21, 1999. *740 *741 David W. Thomas, Nicholasville, KY, Edward E. Dove, Robert T. Gallagher, Lexington, KY, for Eric Tapp. Jerr

OPINION ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judge. The United States appeals from the district court’s order granting defendants’ motion to suppress evidence seized during a warrantless search of a vehicle belonging to defendant, Donald Eric Guimond. We reverse and remand to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this decision.

OPINION OF THE COURT O’ROARK, Chief Judge: Appellant was tried by a general court-martial composed of officer members. Pursuant to his pleas, he was convicted of resisting apprehension in violation of Article 95, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 895 (1982). He was also convicted, contrary to his pleas and by exceptions and substitutions, of assault with a dangerous weapon in violation

OPINION OF THE COURT ON RECONSIDERATION PER CURIAM: This case is before the Court for reconsideration under Article 66 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866 (1982), the Court having considered appellee’s petition for reconsideration and appellant’s opposition thereto, and having determined that the former should be granted.1 Pursuant to h

OPINION J. Brett Busby, Justice This case concerns the scope of a trial court’s power to dismiss causes of action under Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 91a. Appellant Dorothy Savana filed a plea in intervention and third-party petition in the independent administration of the estate of her late husband, Robert James Savana (“the deceased”), asserting causes of action relating to the ownership of a house with

ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANTS’ CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SOROKIN, District Judge. Plaintiffs appeal from a decision of the Administrative Appeals Office (“AAO”) of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) revoking a previously issued visa petition. The US-CIS asserts that the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over this challenge.

[Cite as State v. Sanchez, 2025-Ohio-1256.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : Nos. 114005 and 114011 v. : ISMEAL SANCHEZ, JR.,

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-19-00090-CV Madeleine Connor, Appellant v. Hill Country Animal Hospital and Dr. James R. Holcomb, Appellees FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. C-1-CV-16-005061, THE HONORABLE ERIC SHEPPERD, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION

NO. 07-04-0058-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL E MARCH 21, 2006 ______________________________ GREGORY SHAWN BRYANT AND LINSEY KAY BRYANT, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ESTATE OF KENNA