Cases

*811OPINION & ORDER S. ARTHUR SPIEGEL, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 16), Plaintiffs Response (doc. 19), and Defendant’s Reply (doc. 28). For the reasons indicated herein, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Eric

625 F.3d 1224 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Victor Lavone LEWIS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-3329. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. October 29, 2010. *1226 Melanie S. Morgan, Morgan Pilate, LLC, Olathe, KS, for Defendant-Appellant. Leon Patton, Assistant United States Attorney (Lanny

764 F.Supp.2d 991 (2011) In re PLASMA-DERIVATIVE PROTEIN THERAPIES ANTITRUST LITIGATION This Order Relates to all Actions. Case No. 09 C 7666. MDL No. 2109. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. February 9, 2011. *992 Daniel Hume, David Kovel, Kenneth G. Walsh, Kirby McInerney LLP, New York, NY, Elizabeth R.

EVANS, District Judge: Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint alleges the following. Plaintiffs/Appellants (hereinafter “Plaintiffs”) are the children and heirs of three men (Valmore Locarno Rodriguez, Victor Hugo Orcasita Amaya, and Gustavo Soler Mora) 1 who worked for Defendant Drummond Ltd. at Drum-mond’s coal mining op

69 S.W.3d 568 (2001) STATE of Tennessee v. Robert Lewis CARPENTER, Jr. Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, at Jackson. August 29, 2001. Application for Permission to Appeal Denied December 27, 2001. *570 Robert L. Hutton, Glankler Brown, PLLC, Memphis, TN, for appellant. Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter;

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ANTONIO LAVON DOYLE, No. 20-99013 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:00-cv-00101- v. RCJ-WGC TERRY ROYAL; LAS VEGAS METRO POLICE DEPARTMENT; OPINION ADAM PAUL LAXALT, Respondents-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court

I agree with the majority's unpublished memorandum as to all issues except Issue IV. As to Issue IV, I dissent, based on Judge Shaw's special writing in Poole v. State, [Ms. CR-99-1200, Aug. 31, 2001] ___ So.2d ___ (Ala.Crim.App. 2001). As to those points of law on which I disagree with Judge Shaw, see my special writing in Poole, supra. *Page 167 DECISIONS OF THE ALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPIN

SACK, Circuit Judge: In this litigation, judgment creditors of the Islamic Republic of Iran (“Iran”) attempt to execute on $1.68 billion in bond proceeds allegedly owned by Iran’s central bank. The Supreme Court has instructed that in an execution proceeding concerning a foreign sovereign’s assets, any defense predicated on foreign sovereign immunity must rise or fall on the text of the Foreign Sovereign

14‐1963(L) Kirschenbaum, et al. v. 650 Fifth Avenue and Related Properties UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ______________ August Term 2015 (Argued: November 18, 2015 Decided: July 20, 2016)

15‐0690 Peterson v. Islamic Republic of Iran 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 August Term, 2015 4 (Argued: June 8, 2016 Decided: November 21, 2017*) 5

515 F.Supp.2d 25 (2007) Deborah D. PETERSON, Personal Representative of the Estate of James C. Knipple (Dec.), et al., Plaintiffs, v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, et al., Defendants. Civil Action Nos. 01-2094 (RCL), 01-2684(RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 7, 2007. *26

WESLEY, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs-Appellees (“Plaintiffs”) are direct or indirect victims of terrorist acts linked to the Islamic Republic of Iran (“Iran”), against which they hold unsatisfied money judgments. Plaintiffs contend that they are entitled to enforce these judgments against Defendants-Appellants Alavi Foundation and 650 Fifth Avenue Company (together, “Defendants”),1 pursuant to the Forei

THIS OPINION IS A PRECEDENT OF THE TTAB Hearing: Mailed: March 7, 2013 June 18, 2014 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____ Trademark Trial and Appeal Board _____ Amanda Blackhorse, Marcus Briggs-Cloud, Philip Gover,