⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

8 opinions for “Ergon-West Virginia, Inc. v. EPA”

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020-11-17 · Published · cited 4× · 980 F.3d 403
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-2128 ERGON-WEST VIRGINIA, INCORPORATED, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondent. ------------------------------ NATIONAL BIODIESEL BOARD; PRODUCERS OF RENEWABLES UNITED FOR INTEGRITY TRUTH AND TRANSPARENCY,
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023-11-22 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 22-60266 Document: 00516976800 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/22/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED November 22, 2023 No. 22-60266
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018-07-20 · Published · cited 25× · 896 F.3d 600
AGEE, Circuit Judge: Until 2011, Ergon-West Virginia, Inc. enjoyed an exemption as a small refinery from the Environmental Protection Agency's renewable fuel standard program, which requires refineries and other facilities to allocate a certain percentage of their fuel production to renewable fuels. When Ergon filed for an extension of the small refinery exemption, the EPA denied its pe
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024-01-12 · Published · cited 23× · 90 F.4th 919
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-1185 GREEN PLAINS TRADE GROUP, LLC, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States D
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021-08-13 · Published · cited 17× · 9 F.4th 893
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued January 25, 2021 Decided August 13, 2021 No. 20-1025 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH TRUST, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENTS Consolidated with 20-1138 On Petitions for Review of an Order
Roe v. Shanahanpublic domain
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2019-02-15 · Published · cited 19× · 359 F. Supp. 3d 382
Leonie M. Brinkema, United States District Judge Plaintiffs Richard Roe ("Roe") and Victor Voe ("Voe")1 are members of the United States Air Force who have been diagnosed with the human immunodeficiency virus ("HIV") and who face imminent separation from service. Roe and Voe-together with plaintiff OutServe-SLDN, Inc. ("OutServe"), an organization representing the interests of veterans, active-duty servi
Maryland Attorney General Reports · 2019-03-07 · Published · cited 0×
ENVIRONMENT LAND USE & PLANNING – GROWTH TIERS – WHETHER A LOCAL JURISDICTION IS PROHIBITED FROM AUTHORIZING MAJOR SUBDIVISIONS SERVED BY SEPTIC SYSTEMS IF THE JURISDICTION’S GROWTH TIERS DO NOT COMPLY WITH THE STATUTORY CRITERIA – WHETHER THE STATE MUST ENFORCE VIOLATIONS OF THE STATUTE February 15, 2019 The Honorable Kumar P. Barve House of Delegates of Maryland You have asked for our opinion on two questions regarding the Su
Maryland Attorney General Reports · 2019-02-15 · Published · cited 0×
ENVIRONMENT LAND USE & PLANNING – GROWTH TIERS – WHETHER A LOCAL JURISDICTION IS PROHIBITED FROM AUTHORIZING MAJOR SUBDIVISIONS SERVED BY SEPTIC SYSTEMS IF THE JURISDICTION’S GROWTH TIERS DO NOT COMPLY WITH THE STATUTORY CRITERIA – WHETHER THE STATE MUST ENFORCE VIOLATIONS OF THE STATUTE February 15, 2019 The Honorable Kumar P. Barve House of Delegates of Maryland You have asked for our opinion on two questions regarding the