Cases

ORDER: (1) DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO STRIKE; (2) GRANTING IN PANT AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS; (S) GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT; AND (I) DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO SEVER WITHOUT PREJUDICE DAVID ALAN EZRA, District Judge. On March 12, 2012, the Court heard the United States’ Motion to Intervene and Motion to Stay and the Moving Defendants’ Mo

258 F.Supp.2d 822 (2003) EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION and Constance Amos, Plaintiffs, v. AUTOZONE, INC. Defendant. No. 00-2923 MA/BRE. United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Western Division. March 31, 2003. *824 Celia Liner, Memphis, TN, Deidre Smith, Memphis, TN, and Tom Borek, for EEOC. Reva M. Kreigel

156 F.Supp.2d 926 (2001) EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. DIAL CORPORATION, Defendant. No. CIV. A. 99 C 3356. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois. Eastern Division. August 14, 2001. *927 *928 *929 Jean Powers Kamp, John C. Hend

901 A.2d 1103 (2006) CITY OF BRADFORD v. TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 110, Appellant. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Argued October 18, 2005. Decided June 28, 2006. Michael A. Palombo and Joseph S. Pass, Pittsburgh, for appellant. Mark J. Hollenbeck, Bradford, for appellee. BEFORE: LEADBETTER, Judge, LEAVITT, Judge, and FLAHERTY, Senior Judge.

PHILIP A. BRIMMER, United States District Judge The Court presided over a 16-day trial to court in Phase I of this discrimination case, involving pattern or practice claims brought by the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (the "EEOC") pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Defendant, JBS USA, LLC, d/b/a JBS Swift & Company ("JBS"), owns a beef processing facility in Greeley, Colorado (the "Gre

889 F.Supp. 642 (1995) EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, and The City of New York, Plaintiffs, v. LOCAL 638 ... LOCAL 28 OF the SHEET METAL WORKERS' INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION, et al., Defendants. No. 71 Civ. 2877 (RLC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 6, 1995. *643 *644

723 F.Supp. 734 (1989) EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. CAROLINA FREIGHT CARRIERS CORPORATION, Defendant. No. 87-6322-CIV-JAG. United States District Court, S.D. Florida, Fort Lauderdale Division. October 26, 1989. *735 *736 Lois A. Foster-Steers and Angelo Filippi, Equal

768 F.Supp. 647 (1991) UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. WARSHAWSKY AND COMPANY and Teamsters Union Local 781, Defendants. No. 90 C 1352. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D. July 11, 1991. *648 *649 *650 Shar

FILE THIS OPINION WAS FILED FOR RECORD AT 8 A.M. ON IN CLERK’S OFFICE FEBRUARY 18, 2021 SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WASHINGTON FEBRUARY 18, 2021 SUSAN L. CARLSON

CUDAHY, Circuit Judge. 0 & G Spring and Wire Forms Specialty Company (0 & G) is a small company on Chicago’s West Side that manufactures springs and specialty wire forms to order. The shop has about 50 workers, about 35 of whom work at low-skilled jobs in the “secondary department” operating kick and punch presses. 0 & G recruited for these positions by word-of-mouth and by accepting applications from walk-ins of

SWYGERT, Senior Circuit Judge. This appeal concerns the ability of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) to enforce conciliation agreements in the federal courts. The district court found that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over EEOC’s attempt to enforce a conciliation agreement. EEOC v. Liberty Trucking Co., 528 F.Supp. 610, 624 (W.D.Wis.1981). We reverse. The underlying

577 F.Supp. 1029 (1982) EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, Defendant. No. Civ. 80-853. United States District Court, D. New Jersey. July 29, 1982. Michael J. Connelly, General Counsel, Washington, D.C. by John J. Lokos, Trial Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff. Carpenter, Bennett & Morrissey by T

478 U.S. 421 (1986) LOCAL 28 OF THE SHEET METAL WORKERS' INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION ET AL. v. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION ET AL. No. 84-1656. Supreme Court of United States. Argued February 25, 1986 Decided July 2, 1986 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT *425 Mar

695 F.2d 1038 30 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 884,30 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,262EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.LIBERTY TRUCKING COMPANY and Teamsters Local No. 695,Defendants-Appellees. No. 82-1289. United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit. Argued Sept. 22, 1982.Decided Dec. 20, 1982.

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ORMA R. SMITH, District Judge. This action has been submitted for decision after a full evidentiary hearing at a non-jury trial. The court having considered the evidence introduced and the entire file, now makes the findings of fact and conclusions of law as hereinafter more fully set forth. I. The Parties and Plants Involved A. Plain

Opinion for the Court filed by LEVEN-THAL, Circuit Judge. LEVENTHAL, Circuit Judge: This is an appeal from two orders of the District Court, entered on June 24, 1974, in an action brought by the Secretary of Labor (Secretary), appellee here, under Title IV of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959 (LMRDA), 29 U.S.C. § 481 et seq. The first order granted final judgment, without

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) NATIONAL TREASURY ) EMPLOYEES UNION, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) Civil Action No. 25-0381 (AB

SUSAN L. CARNEY, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff-Appellant Cole Fowlkes appeals from a December 20, 2011 judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Preska, Chief Judge), dismissing his in forma pauperis complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Fowlkes, who self-identifies as male but was born biologically fe*381

12‐336‐cv Fowlkes v. Ironworkers Local 40, et al. 12‐336‐cv Fowlkes v. Ironworkers Local 40, et al. 1 2 United States Court of Appeals 3 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 4 ______________ 5 6 August Term, 2014 7

543 F.2d 369 93 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2113, 177 U.S.App.D.C. 222,79 Lab.Cas. P 11,570 William J. USERY, Jr., Secretary of Labor, et al., Appellants,v.LOCAL UNION NO. 639 INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS,CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN AND HELPERS OF AMERICA, Ind. No. 74-1851. United States Court of Appeals,District of Columbia Circuit.