Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
15 opinions for “Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. AN Luxury Imports of Tucson Incorporated”
734 F.Supp.2d 1035 (2010) EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. TIMELESS INVESTMENTS, INC. dba EZ Trip Golden State Convenience and Auto/Truck Plaza, and Does 1-5, inclusive, Defendant. No. 1:08-cv-1469 AWI SMS. United States District Court, E.D. California. August 13, 2010. *1042 Anna Y. Park, Amrita Mallik, Lor
Avenue 6E Investments, LLC v. City of Yumapublic domain
OPINION REINHARDT, Circuit Judge: The Fair Housing Act (FHA) is one-of the most, important pieces of-legislation to be enacted by the Congress in the past. 60 years. It strikes at the heart of the persistent racism that so deeply troubles our Nation. Here, we deal, with one aspect of that law: zoning or rezoning of land as it affects the construction of
42 F.3d 1217 65 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 43,348, 63 USLW 2381,95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 13,253 Maria-Kelley F. YNIGUEZ; Jaime P. Gutierrez, Plaintiffs-Appellees,andArizonans Against Constitutional Tampering,Intervenors-Plaintiffs-Appellees,andState of Arizona; Rose Mofford; Robert Corbin, et al.,Defendants-Appellees,v.ARIZONANS FOR OFFICIAL ENGLISH; Robert D. Parks,Intervenors-Defenda
69 F.3d 920 66 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 43,726, 64 USLW 2219,95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7821,95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 13,447 Maria-Kelley F. YNIGUEZ; Jaime P. Gutierrez, Plaintiffs-Appellees,andArizonans Against Constitutional Tampering,Intervenors-Plaintiffs-Appellees,andState of Arizona; Rose Mofford; Robert Corbin, et al.,Defendants-Appellees,v.ARIZONANS FOR OFFICIAL ENGLISH; Robert
Sirois v. E. W. Partners, Inc.public domain
Derrick K. Watson, United States District Judge Before the Court is Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Individual Defendants and to Strike Immaterial, Impertinent and Scandalous Matters (Dkt. No. 17) filed August 30, 2017. Defendants' Motion is GRANTED to the extent it asserts that service of the summons and complaint on the individual defendants has not been properly effected. Plaintiff is therefore ordered to effect service on them in
Reaves v. Nexstar Broad., Inc.public domain
HERNANDEZ, District Judge: Plaintiff Christopher Reaves brings this employment discrimination and tort action *1356against his former employer Lin Television Corporation (LIN-TV) as well as Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc. (Nexstar), a company that LIN-TV merged with after the events in this case occurred. Defendants move for summary judgment on t
Virginia Duncan v. Rob Bontapublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT VIRGINIA DUNCAN; RICHARD LEWIS; No. 19-55376 PATRICK LOVETTE; DAVID MARGUGLIO; CHRISTOPHER D.C. No. WADDELL; CALIFORNIA RIFLE & 3:17-cv-01017- PISTOL ASSOCIATION, INC., a BEN-JLB California corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees, OPINION v. ROB BONTA, in his offic
Virginia Duncan v. Rob Bontapublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT VIRGINIA DUNCAN; RICHARD LEWIS; No. 19-55376 PATRICK LOVETTE; DAVID MARGUGLIO; CHRISTOPHER D.C. No. WADDELL; CALIFORNIA RIFLE & 3:17-cv-01017- PISTOL ASSOCIATION, INC., a BEN-JLB California corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees, OPINION v. ROB BONTA, in his offic
Yniguez v. Arizonans for Official Englishpublic domain
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge: These consolidated appeals require us to consider an important area, of constitutional law, rarely reexamined since a series of cases in the 1920s in which the Supreme Court struck down laws restricting the use of non-English languages. See Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 43 S.Ct. 625, 67 L.Ed. 1042 (1923); Bartels v. Iowa, 262 U.S. 404, 43 S.Ct. 628, 67 L.Ed. 1047 (1923); Y
Flagstaff Medical Center, Inc. v. Sullivanpublic domain
773 F.Supp. 1325 (1991) FLAGSTAFF MEDICAL CENTER, INC., Plaintiff, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, Secretary of Health & Human Services, Defendant. Nos. CIV 88-1881-PCT-CAM, CIV 89-0576-PCT-CAM. United States District Court, D. Arizona. August 22, 1991. *1326 *1327 *132
Yniguez v. Arizonans for Official Englishpublic domain
Opinion by Judge REINHARDT; Concurrence by Judge BRUNETTI; Special Concurrence by Judge REINHARDT; Dissent by Judge FERNANDEZ; Concurrence to Dissent by Chief Judge WALLACE; Dissent by Judge KOZINSKI. REINHARDT, Circuit Judge: These consolidated appeals require us to consider an important area of constitutional law, rarely reexamined since a series of eases in the 1920s in which the Supreme Court struc
United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.public domain
449 F.Supp.2d 1 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, and National African American Tobacco Prevention Network, Intervenors, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., (f/k/a Philip Morris, Inc.), et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-2496(GK). United States Distri
Allen v. United Statespublic domain
588 F.Supp. 247 (1984) Irene ALLEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Civ. No. C-79-0515J. United States District Court, D. Utah, C.D. May 10, 1984. *248 *249 *250 *251
Southern Pacific Transp. Co. v. Commissionerpublic domain
CONTENTS Page Headnote . 499 Opinion (Introduction) . 505 General Findings of Fact . 506 I. Issue (i): Rapid Amortization of Freight Cars Findings of Fact Opinion . 1Í5 ^ H H CO LO lO lO II. Issues (hh) and (9): Recovery Upon Merger of Previously Deducted Amounts . 548 Findings of Fact . 549 Opinion . 557 Is
556 F.Supp. 825 (1982) SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 78-0545. United States District Court, District of Columbia. December 21, 1982. As Amended January 10, 1983. *826 *827