Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
8 opinions for “Epstein, as United States Trustee for Region 7 v. Premier Legal Services”
Love Terminal Partners, L.P. v. United Statespublic domain
Fifth Amendment Taking; Lucas Categorical Taking; Regulatory Taking; Penn Central Factors; Just Compensation; Highest and Best Use of Property; Posttrial Award OPINION AND ORDER SWEENEY, Judge Plaintiffs Love Terminal Partners, L.P. (“Love Terminal Partners”) and Virginia Aerosp
Mireles v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.public domain
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO REMAND; DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge. On August 16, 2011, plaintiffs filed this action in Los Angeles Superior Court.1 Defendants removed the case to this court on September 16, 2011, asserting that the action was a “mass tort” action and invoking jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairne
Anderson Living Trust v. WPX Energy Production, LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Motion and Supporting Brief to Determine That This Matter Proceed as a Class Action, filed January 6, 2014 (Doe. 194)(“Motion”). The Court held a two-part class certification hearing with its first portion on March 10,11, and 12, 2014, and its second portion on April 3 and 4, 2014.
Synthes, Inc. v. Emerge Medical, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM BUCKWALTER, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO LIABILITY I.STATEMENT OF FACTS. A. Persons Relevant to the Suit. 1. The Parties. 2. Other Relevant Individuals. B. Background of the Key Players’ Employment With Synthes 1. Defendant Marotta
In re Lease Oil Antitrust Litigationpublic domain
ORDER NO. 75 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW REGARDING PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTS JACK, District Judge. On April 5 through 9, 1999, came on to be held a fairness hearing to consider granting approval to eight proposed settlement agreements in the above-styled litigation. For the reasons stated herein, the Court FINDS that all eight of the proposed settlement agreements should be app
Abraham v. WPX Production Productions, LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER1 JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion for Class Certification, filed January 13, 2014 (Doe. 116). The Court held a multi-part class certification heating, which took place on: (i) May 8 and 9, 2014; (ii) March 13 and 14, 2014; (iii) June 30, 2014; and (iv) July 14, 2014
817 F.2d 762 260 U.S.App.D.C. 39, 55 USLW 2503, 13Media L. Rep. 2377 William P. TAVOULAREAS, Appellant,Peter Tavoulareasv.Philip PIRO.William P. TAVOULAREAS, Appellant,Peter Tavoulareasv.The WASHINGTON POST COMPANY, d/b/a The Washington Post, aDelaware Corporation, et al. Nos. 83-1604, 83-1605. United States Court of Appeals,Distr
East Texas Medical Center Gilmer v. Birder Porterpublic domain
ACCEPTED 12-14-00220-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 9/4/2015 3:01:53 PM