Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Enoch Jones”
Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC15-1662 ____________ ENOCH D. HALL, Appellant, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. ____________ No. SC16-2
State v. Enochpublic domain
HUNTER, JR., ROBERT N., Judge. *476 Rodney Lee Enoch ("Defendant") appeals from a 16 September 2016 judgment after a jury convicted him of one count of first degree *547 murder. Following the
State v. Enochpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Enoch, 2020-Ohio-3406.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2019-07-117 : OPINION - vs -
State of Tennessee v. Joshua Lee Enochpublic domain
07/01/2024 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs April 2, 2024 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JOSHUA LEE ENOCH Appeal from the Circuit Court for Henry County No. 16734 Bruce Irwin Griffey, Judge ___________________________________
Welch v. Jonespublic domain
770 F.Supp.2d 1253 (2011) Michael WELCH, Plaintiff, v. Julie L. JONES in her official capacity as executive director of the Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, Defendant. Case No. 4:09cv302-RH/WCS. United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Tallahassee Division. March 3, 2011. *1254 Lance August Harke, Howar
People v. Enochpublic domain
122 Ill.2d 176 (1988) 522 N.E.2d 1124 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Appellee, v. WILLIE E. ENOCH, Appellant. No. 59390. Supreme Court of Illinois. Opinion filed February 11, 1988. Rehearing denied May 31, 1988. *177 *178
AFFIRMED and Opinion Filed April 24, 2020 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00802-CV HOSSEIN S. NAMDARKHAN AND BARDIA NAMDARKHAN, Appellants V. GLAST, PHILLIPS & MURRAY, P.C., MARK C. ENOCH, MARK C. ENOCH, PC, AND MATTHEW E
Jones v. Wet Seal Retail, Inc.public domain
519 F.Supp.2d 1164 (2007) Latia JONES, Plaintiff, v. WET SEAL RETAIL, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 07-2110-JWL-DJW. United States District Court, D. Kansas. October 31, 2007. *1165 Donald F. McDonald, Jr., Kansas City, MO, for Plaintiff. Casey O. Housley, Ryan C. Fowler, Tyson H. Ketchum, Armstrong Teasdale LLP, Kansas Ci
Jones v. Wet Seal Retail, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DAVID J. WAXSE, United States Magistrate Judge. Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Defendant ERMC II (“ERMC”) to produce documents (doc. 41) and Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Defendant Wet Seal Retail, Inc. d/b/a Arden B (“Arden B”) to produce documents (doc. 44). For the reasons stated below, both of Plaintiffs Motions will be granted.
MAXWELL, JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. This is an interlocutory appeal of the denial of summary judgment. The circuit court ruled Enoch Oliver could proceed to trial with his malicious-prosecution claim against University of Mississippi Medical Center (UMMC) and two of its law-enforcement officers, Syrone McBeath and David Stewart. But after de novo review, w
Abrams v. Jonespublic domain
Justice OWEN delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice PHILLIPS, Justice ENOCH, Justice ABBOTT, Justice HANKINSON, Justice O’NEILL, and Justice GONZALES join. This case presents issues of statutory construction. We are called upon to determine if either section 153.072 of the Family Code or section 611.0045 of the Health and Safety Code allows a parent to demand acce
Jones v. City of Houstonpublic domain
ENOCH, Justice, joined by ABBOTT and HANKINSON, Justices, dissenting. I continue to believe that the “implied filing” rule announced in Verburgt v. Dor-ner1 is both unwise and unsound.2 Accordingly, I dissent. . 959 S.W.2d 615 (Tex.1997). . See id. </
Enoch v. Inmanpublic domain
Plaintiff Valerie Enoch appeals the trial court's order granting defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's race discrimination claims. Although, unfortunately, the complaint fails to specifically reference any statute as the legal basis for the claim, we hold that its allegations are sufficient to state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Although defendants contend that a public sector employee may only challenge race discrimination by filing a claim un
Mathis v. Jones Store Co.public domain
952 S.W.2d 360 (1997) Mary and Ed MATHIS, Respondents-Appellants, v. JONES STORE COMPANY, Appellant-Respondent, Rite-Way Magic Supply, Inc., Respondent. Nos. WD 52597, WD 52618. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. September 23, 1997. *362 G. Spencer Miller, Christopher L. Heigele, Ed and Mary Mathis, Kansas City, for
Jones v. Automobile Club Inter-Insurance Exchangepublic domain
26 Kan. App.2d 206 (1999) 981 P.2d 767 JOAN COFFMAN JONES, Appellant, v. AUTOMOBILE CLUB INTER-INSURANCE EXCHANGE, Appellee. No. 79,573. Court of Appeals of Kansas. Opinion filed June 11, 1999. *207 Patricia L. Lear-Johnson and S. W. Longan, III, of Longan & Associates, of Leawood, for ap
Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. Enochpublic domain
PALMORE, Justice. This is a highway condemnation case in which the interest of the landowner consisted of mineral rights only. The actual taking embraced 32.52 acres, but this acreage was so located that it separated or “landlocked” another 31.39 acres from the remainder of the owner’s mineral tract. In accordance with the instructions, which by stipulation treated the acreage taken and the landlocked acreage as separate tra
Jones v. Griegepublic domain
803 S.W.2d 486 (1991) William JONES, et al., Appellants, v. Mark C. GRIEGE, Appellee. No. 05-90-01194-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. January 30, 1991. *487 William M. Jones, Dallas, for appellants. Robert A. Miller, David E. Caviness, Dallas, for appellee. Before ENOCH, C.J., and LAGARDE and BURNETT, JJ.
Money v. Jonespublic domain
766 S.W.2d 307 (1989) Guy F. MONEY, Appellant, v. Wanda A. JONES, Appellee. No. 05-88-00714-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. January 23, 1989. Rehearing Denied March 16, 1989. Melvin H. Wolovits, William T. Mitchell, III, Dallas, for appellant. Arlen D. Bynam, Dallas, for appellee. *308 Before
People v. Enochpublic domain
—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Budd Goodman, J.), rendered June 25, 1993, convicting defendant, after jury trial, of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 10 to 20 years, unanimously affirmed. The trial court properly found that the People had made reasonable efforts to locate defendant, and that defendant’s absence from the trial proceedings following the court’s delivery of
National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v. Jonespublic domain
Chief Justice PHILLIPS delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Justice HECHT, Justice ENOCH, Justice OWEN and Justice O’NEILL joined. We must decide whether the court of appeals erred in dismissing as moot an appeal from a temporary injunction. The trial court granted Joel Casey Jones, then an offensive guard on the Texas Tech University Red Raiders’ football team, a temporary