⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Energy Transfer LP v. National Labor Relations Board”

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017-02-22 · Published · cited 2× · 849 F.3d 250; 2017 WL 706158; 208 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3305; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 3226
*253 EDWARD C. PRADO, Circuit Judge: This Court is asked to review an order of the National Labor Relations Board (“the NLRB” or “the Board”) finding that Alcoa, Inc. (“Alcoa”) and its wholly owned subsidiary, Alcoa Commercial Windows, LLC d/b/a TRACO (“TRACO”), violated the National Labor Relations Act (
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013-07-17 · Published · cited 3× · 722 F.3d 609
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1514 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. ENTERPRISE LEASING COMPANY SOUTHEAST, LLC, Respondent. _______________ On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. (11-CA-73779)
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-08-21 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 01-15-00715-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 8/21/2015 3:23:43 PM
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2018-11-29 · Published · cited 1× · 355 F. Supp. 3d 1065
James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiff's Reconsideration Motion, filed September 15, 2018 (Doc. 25) ("Reconsideration Motion"). The Court held a hearing on October 25, 2018. The primary issues are: (i) whether the Court committed manifest legal error in its Memorandum Opinion and Order,
District Court, S.D. Texas · 2010-02-11 · Published · cited 4× · 690 F. Supp. 2d 558; 179 Oil & Gas Rep. 838; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11847; 2010 WL 582564
690 F.Supp.2d 558 (2010) MARINER ENERGY, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. DEVON ENERGY PRODUCTION CO., Defendant. Civil Action No. H-08-0658. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. February 11, 2010. *562 Bradley Lane Deluca, Johnson Finkel et al, Houston, TX, for Plaintiffs. Edward John Jack O'Neill, Jr.,
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2017-06-23 · Published · cited 93× · 897 N.W.2d 553; 2017 WL 2705389; 2017 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 75; 130 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 385
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 15–0574 Filed June 23, 2017 TINA HASKENHOFF, Appellee, vs. HOMELAND ENERGY SOLUTIONS, LLC, Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Chickasaw County, John J. Bauercamper, Judge. Employer appeals judgment on jury verdict for plaintiff on claims for sexual harassment and retaliation. DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT REVERSED AND CASE REMANDED FOR NEW T
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020-08-19 · Published · cited 0×
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ________________ No. 18-3327 ________________ In re: NATIONAL COLLEGIATE STUDENT LOAN TRUSTS 2003-1, 2004-1, 2004-2, 2005-1, 2005-2, 2005-3 *Waterfall Asset Management, LLC, One William Street Capital Master Fund, Ltd.,
Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2012-07-25 · Published · cited 7× · 817 N.W.2d 122; 2012 WL 3023210; 2012 Minn. LEXIS 308
OPINION MEYER, Justice. The threshold issue in each of these cases is our jurisdiction to review by cer-tiorari an interlocutory decision of the tax court. We conclude that we lack jurisdiction in each case and therefore dismiss the writs of certiorari. Respondent Beuning Family Limited Partnership (Beuning) is a part-owner of 8.92 acres of unimproved vacant land in LeSauk Township in
Hawaii Supreme Court · 2023-10-31 · Published · cited 12× · 153 Haw. 326; 537 P.3d 1173
*** FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST’S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER *** Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAP-XX-XXXXXXX 31-OCT-2023 08:57 AM Dkt. 74 OP
District Court, S.D. Texas · 2016-03-31 · Published · cited 4× · 166 F. Supp. 3d 822; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44456; 2016 WL 1305922
*827OPINION AND ORDER MELINDA HARMON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The above referenced securities-fraud, putative class action alleges material misrepresentations and omissions by Defendants regarding Key Energy Services, Inc.’s (“Key’s”) financial condition and the future of its business, leading to inflated stock prices in violation of §§ 10(b), co
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2015-03-19 · Published · cited 7× · 306 F.R.D. 312; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37256; 2015 WL 1321479
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Motion and Supporting Brief to Determine That This Matter Proceed as a Class Action, filed January 6, 2014 (Doe. 194)(“Motion”). The Court held a two-part class certification hearing with its first portion on March 10,11, and 12, 2014, and its second portion on April 3 and 4, 2014.
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2015-06-24 · Published · cited 23× · 308 F.R.D. 410; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86226; 2015 WL 4040616
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES 0. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Scheduling Conference, filed March 31, 2015 (Doc. 279)(“Motion”). The Court held a hearing on May 12, 2015. The primary issues are: (i) whether the Court should reopen discovery on issues relevant only to class certification; and (ii) whether the Court should set a sch
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2009-07-28 · Published · cited 10× · 409 B.R. 211; 2009 WL 2898876; 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 2132; 51 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 270
409 B.R. 211 (2009) In re ENERGY PARTNERS, LTD., et al., Debtors. No. 09-32957-H4-11. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. July 28, 2009. *214 Duston K. McFaul, Vinson Elkins LLP, Houston, TX, Michaela Christine Crocker, *215 Paul E. Heath, Vinson Elkins LLP, Dallas, TX, Paul
Superior Court of Delaware · 2022-04-25 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SCHNEIDER NATIONAL CARRIERS, INC., ) ) Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. N21C-10-157-PAF ) RAYMOND J. KUNTZ, as Sellers’
District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2012-03-28 · Published · cited 2× · 883 F. Supp. 2d 597; 2012 WL 3156765; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42563
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER IRENE C. BERGER, District Judge. Lead Plaintiff, Commonwealth of Massachusetts Pension Reserves Investment Trust (“Massachusetts PRIT”) and Plaintiff David Wagner, on behalf of the putative class, allege that the price of Massey Energy Company (“Massey”) stock was artificially inflated, between February 1, 2008, and July 27, 2010, because Massey and several of its senior executi
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2014-09-22 · Published · cited 1× · 302 F.R.D. 628; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 132329; 2014 WL 4715881
*631 ORDER LEE R. WEST, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Amended Consolidated Shareholder Derivative Complaint filed pursuant to Rules 23.1 and 12(b)(6), F.R.Civ.P., by nominal defendant SandRidge Energy, Inc. (“SandRidge”), and defendants Jim J. Brewer, Everett R. Dobson, William A.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013-06-12 · Published · cited 11× · 310 P.3d 657; 2013 OK CIV APP 75; 2013 Okla. Civ. App. LEXIS 69; 2013 WL 4525726
JERRY L. GOODMAN, Judge. T1 This is the appeal and counter-appeal arising out of the trial court's May 8, 2010, order awarding James Coen, Brent Cooper, Ronald A. Majors, Timothy O'Sullivan, Frank Panzer, Larry Payne, Timothy Purcell, and Darrell Weakland (collectively "Plaintiffs," unless addressed individually) the collective sum of $1,019,424.00 on their wage and breach of contract claims.1,
District Court, S.D. Texas · 2013-08-22 · Published · cited 0× · 970 F. Supp. 2d 613; 2013 WL 4520334
OPINION AND ORDER MELINDA HARMON, District Judge. Pending before the Court in the above referenced, putative federal securities class action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(a) and (b)(3), brought on behalf of persons other than Defendants who purchased Houston American Energy Corp. common stock between November 9, 2009 and April 18, 2012 (the putative “Class Period”), is Defendants