Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Energy Harbor LLC and Pleasants Corp.”
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS DAVID KRIEGER, ANDREW KRIEGER, JAMES FOR PUBLICATION SPERLING, and MARGARET SPERLING, on September 7, 2023 Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly 9:05 a.m. Si
PER CURIAM. The plaintiff, Robert H. Lawrence, Jr., appeals from the judgment of the Superior Court dismissing his administrative appeal from the decision of the Commissioner of Energy and Environmental Protection (commissioner) granting the application of 16 Highgate Road, LLC (Highgate), to construct a residential dock and pier. The plaintiff claims that the court improperly conclude
MEMORANDUM DECISION MICHAEL B. KAPLAN, U.S.B.J. I. Introduction The matters before the Court in this these adversary proceedings are two complaints brought by Plaintiff Dots, LLC (“Dots” or “Debtor” or “Plaintiff’), against Defendants Finance One, Inc. and Milberg Factors, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants” or “Factors;” or, individually, “Finance One” and “Milberg”), seeking the recover
George v. Duke Energy Retirement Cash Balance Planpublic domain
ORDER R. BRYAN HARWELL, District Judge. Pending before the court is Plaintiffs’ [Docket Entry #220] amended motion to certify a class. This proposed class action arises from Defendant Duke Energy Corporation’s conversion of its traditional defined benefit plan to a cash balance plan. Background Plaintiffs’ amended class action complaint alleges three causes o
Joyce Halling and Medcon Inc., a Utah corporation v. David A. Yovanovich and Ornella Dalla Bonapublic domain
FOX, Justice. [¶1] David Hailing, as manager of Professional Business Holdings, LP (PBH), and Joyce Hailing, as president of MedCon, Inc, (MedCon), each purchased an undivided half interest in a parcel of land in Lincoln County, Wyoming, from Brandon Bentley. Mr. Hailing, individually and as manager of PBH, executed a mortgage in favor of Mr. Bentley on PBH’s half interest as se
John Doe I v. Exxon Mobil Corppublic domain
UNITED STA TES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JOHN DOE I, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 1:0l-cv-1357-RCL EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Following its resolution of cross-motions for sanctions stemming from a deposition, the
In Re Lear Corp. Shareholder Litigationpublic domain
926 A.2d 94 (2007) In re LEAR CORPORATION SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION. C.A. No. 2728-VCS. Court of Chancery of Delaware. Submitted: June 8, 2007. Decided: June 15, 2007. *96 Pamela S. Tikellis, Esquire, Chimicles & Tikellis, LLP, Wilmington, Delaware, for Plaintiff. Seth D. Rigrodsky, Esquire, Brian D. Long, Esquir
Protect Lake Pleasant, LLC v. McDonaldpublic domain
609 F.Supp.2d 895 (2009) PROTECT LAKE PLEASANT, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company; David Maule-Ffinch; Michael Viscuis; and Pensus Group, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company, Plaintiffs v. J. William McDONALD in his official capacity as Commissioner, United States Bureau of Reclamation;[1] United States Bureau of Reclamation; an agency of the United States Department of Interior, and Ken Salazar, in his official capaci
Effie Film, LLC v. Murphypublic domain
AMENDED OPINION THOMAS P. GRIESA, District Judge. This is an action for declaratory judgment brought by Effie Film, LLC against Gregory Murphy. Effie Film is a company formed to produce a film based on a *542screenplay, “Effie,” written by Emma Thompson1 based on the infamous, unhappy marriage of Effie Gray and John Rus
Bouveng v. NYG Capital LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER PAUL G. GARDEPHE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE. Plaintiff Hanna Bouveng brings this action against Defendants NYG Capital LLC, d/b/a New York Global Group (“NYGG”), FNL Media LLC (“FNL Media”), and Benjamin Wey alleging claims of (1) quid pro quo sexual harassment under the New York State Human Rights Law (the “NYSHRL”) and New York City Human Rights Law (the “NYCHRL”) again
ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
In Re Oracle Corp.public domain
867 A.2d 904 (2004) In re ORACLE CORP., Derivative Litigation. C.A. No. 18751. Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle County. Submitted: September 3, 2004. Decided: November 24, 2004. Revised: December 2, 2004. *905 Robert D. Goldberg, Esquire, Victor Battaglia, Esquire, Biggs & Battaglia, Wilming
ORDER JOHN E. WAITES, Bankruptcy Judge. This matter is before the Court upon the Motion of AGM, II, LLC and Lancelot Investor Fund, L.P. (“Defendants”) to dismiss the amended complaint filed by Michelle L. Vieira, as Chapter 7 Trustee (“Trustee”) for Worldwide Wholesale Lumber, Inc. (“Debtor”), pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and (6). The Court makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of La
HALLER, J. *354The Orange County Water District (District) was created by the California Legislature to protect and manage groundwater supplies within its territory, which covers most of Orange County, California. The District and other regulatory agencies have long been aware of localized groundwater contamination caused by hazardous substan
Kelley v. Cinar Corp.public domain
MEMORANDUM & ORDER DEARIE, District Judge. This case involves four separate actions arising out of allegedly fraudulent disclosures made by defendant CINAR Corporation (“CINAR” or “the Company”) and its officers in various public financial statements issued during the period from April 8, 1998 through March 10, 2000. The first suit, In re CINAR Corporation Securities Litigation, No
in Re: Enterprise Crude Oil, LLCpublic domain
ACCEPTED 05-17-01421-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 1/30/2018 5:10 PM
In Re CINAR Corp. Securities Litigationpublic domain
186 F.Supp.2d 279 (2002) In re CINAR CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION Phillip G. Kelley, Kathy H. Kelley, Michael G. Mayberry, and Sharon H. Mayberry, Plaintiffs, v. Cinar Corporation, Micheline Charest, and Ronald A. Weinberg, Defendants. Steven T. CARSON, Patricia L. Carson, and Janet B. Dellosa, Plaintiffs, v. Cinar Corporation, Cinar Holdings, Inc., Micheline Charest, Ronald A. Weinberg, and Hasanain Panju, Defendants. Ka
NKIHTAQMIKON v. Bureau of Indian Affairspublic domain
672 F.Supp.2d 149 (2009) Nulankeyutmonen NKIHTAQMIKON, Plaintiff, v. BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS, Defendant. No. CV-05-188-B-W. United States District Court, D. Maine. November 13, 2009. *150 David K. Mears, Justin E. Kolber, Patrick A. Parenteau, Teresa B. Clemmer, Environmental and Natural Resources Law Clinic, Vermont Law School,
PHOENIX PINELANDS CORPORATION, ETC. VS. HARRY DAVIDOFF (C-000246-11, OCEAN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)public domain
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2823-16 PHOENIX PINELANDS CORPORATION, a New Jersey Corporation, APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION Plaintiff-Respondent, April 29, 2021 APPELLATE DIVISION v
NKIHTAQMIKON v. Bureau of Indian Affairspublic domain
601 F.Supp.2d 337 (2009) Nulankeyutmonen NKIHTAQMIKON, Plaintiff, v. BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS, Department of the Interior, Defendants. No. CV-05-188-B-W. United States District Court, D. Maine. March 4, 2009. David K. Mears, Justin E. Kolber, Patrick A. Parenteau, Environmental and Natural Resources Law Clinic, Vermont Law School, South Royalton, VT, Lynne A. Willia