⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Energy Harbor LLC and Pleasants Corp.”

Michigan Court of Appeals · 2023-09-07 · Published · cited 0×
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS DAVID KRIEGER, ANDREW KRIEGER, JAMES FOR PUBLICATION SPERLING, and MARGARET SPERLING, on September 7, 2023 Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly 9:05 a.m. Si
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2017-12-12 · Published · cited 0× · 176 A.3d 608; 178 Conn. App. 615
PER CURIAM. The plaintiff, Robert H. Lawrence, Jr., appeals from the judgment of the Superior Court dismissing his administrative appeal from the decision of the Commissioner of Energy and Environmental Protection (commissioner) granting the application of 16 Highgate Road, LLC (Highgate), to construct a residential dock and pier. The plaintiff claims that the court improperly conclude
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2017-01-10 · Published · cited 9× · 562 B.R. 286
MEMORANDUM DECISION MICHAEL B. KAPLAN, U.S.B.J. I. Introduction The matters before the Court in this these adversary proceedings are two complaints brought by Plaintiff Dots, LLC (“Dots” or “Debtor” or “Plaintiff’), against Defendants Finance One, Inc. and Milberg Factors, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants” or “Factors;” or, individually, “Finance One” and “Milberg”), seeking the recover
District Court, D. South Carolina · 2009-09-04 · Published · cited 1× · 259 F.R.D. 225; 47 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2278; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80947; 2009 WL 2914214
ORDER R. BRYAN HARWELL, District Judge. Pending before the court is Plaintiffs’ [Docket Entry #220] amended motion to certify a class. This proposed class action arises from Defendant Duke Energy Corporation’s conversion of its traditional defined benefit plan to a cash balance plan. Background Plaintiffs’ amended class action complaint alleges three causes o
Wyoming Supreme Court · 2017-03-09 · Published · cited 28× · 2017 WY 28; 391 P.3d 611; 2017 WL 931730; 2017 Wyo. LEXIS 29
FOX, Justice. [¶1] David Hailing, as manager of Professional Business Holdings, LP (PBH), and Joyce Hailing, as president of MedCon, Inc, (MedCon), each purchased an undivided half interest in a parcel of land in Lincoln County, Wyoming, from Brandon Bentley. Mr. Hailing, individually and as manager of PBH, executed a mortgage in favor of Mr. Bentley on PBH’s half interest as se
District Court, District of Columbia · 2021-05-12 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STA TES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JOHN DOE I, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 1:0l-cv-1357-RCL EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Following its resolution of cross-motions for sanctions stemming from a deposition, the
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2007-06-15 · Published · cited 44× · 926 A.2d 94; 2007 Del. Ch. LEXIS 88; 2007 WL 1732588
926 A.2d 94 (2007) In re LEAR CORPORATION SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION. C.A. No. 2728-VCS. Court of Chancery of Delaware. Submitted: June 8, 2007. Decided: June 15, 2007. *96 Pamela S. Tikellis, Esquire, Chimicles & Tikellis, LLP, Wilmington, Delaware, for Plaintiff. Seth D. Rigrodsky, Esquire, Brian D. Long, Esquir
District Court, D. Arizona · 2009-03-23 · Published · cited 4× · 609 F. Supp. 2d 895; 2009 WL 775538
609 F.Supp.2d 895 (2009) PROTECT LAKE PLEASANT, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company; David Maule-Ffinch; Michael Viscuis; and Pensus Group, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company, Plaintiffs v. J. William McDONALD in his official capacity as Commissioner, United States Bureau of Reclamation;[1] United States Bureau of Reclamation; an agency of the United States Department of Interior, and Ken Salazar, in his official capaci
District Court, S.D. New York · 2013-03-22 · Published · cited 4× · 932 F. Supp. 2d 538; 2013 WL 1188018; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41634
AMENDED OPINION THOMAS P. GRIESA, District Judge. This is an action for declaratory judgment brought by Effie Film, LLC against Gregory Murphy. Effie Film is a company formed to produce a film based on a *542screenplay, “Effie,” written by Emma Thompson1 based on the infamous, unhappy marriage of Effie Gray and John Rus
District Court, S.D. New York · 2016-03-31 · Published · cited 25× · 175 F. Supp. 3d 280; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44283; 2016 WL 1312139
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER PAUL G. GARDEPHE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE. Plaintiff Hanna Bouveng brings this action against Defendants NYG Capital LLC, d/b/a New York Global Group (“NYGG”), FNL Media LLC (“FNL Media”), and Benjamin Wey alleging claims of (1) quid pro quo sexual harassment under the New York State Human Rights Law (the “NYSHRL”) and New York City Human Rights Law (the “NYCHRL”) again
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-08-24 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
In Re Oracle Corp.public domain
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2004-12-02 · Published · cited 63× · 867 A.2d 904; 2004 WL 3176478
867 A.2d 904 (2004) In re ORACLE CORP., Derivative Litigation. C.A. No. 18751. Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle County. Submitted: September 3, 2004. Decided: November 24, 2004. Revised: December 2, 2004. *905 Robert D. Goldberg, Esquire, Victor Battaglia, Esquire, Biggs & Battaglia, Wilming
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2007-05-21 · Published · cited 11× · 372 B.R. 796; 2007 Bankr. LEXIS 1882
ORDER JOHN E. WAITES, Bankruptcy Judge. This matter is before the Court upon the Motion of AGM, II, LLC and Lancelot Investor Fund, L.P. (“Defendants”) to dismiss the amended complaint filed by Michelle L. Vieira, as Chapter 7 Trustee (“Trustee”) for Worldwide Wholesale Lumber, Inc. (“Debtor”), pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and (6). The Court makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of La
California Court of Appeal, 5th District · 2017-08-04 · Published · cited 68× · 222 Cal. Rptr. 3d 83; 14 Cal. App. 5th 343; 47 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20099; 2017 WL 3326959; 2017 Cal. App. LEXIS 680
HALLER, J. *354The Orange County Water District (District) was created by the California Legislature to protect and manage groundwater supplies within its territory, which covers most of Orange County, California. The District and other regulatory agencies have long been aware of localized groundwater contamination caused by hazardous substan
District Court, E.D. New York · 2002-02-25 · Published · cited 1× · 186 F. Supp. 2d 279; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3174
MEMORANDUM & ORDER DEARIE, District Judge. This case involves four separate actions arising out of allegedly fraudulent disclosures made by defendant CINAR Corporation (“CINAR” or “the Company”) and its officers in various public financial statements issued during the period from April 8, 1998 through March 10, 2000. The first suit, In re CINAR Corporation Securities Litigation, No
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2018-01-30 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 05-17-01421-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 1/30/2018 5:10 PM
District Court, E.D. New York · 2002-03-05 · Published · cited 45× · 186 F. Supp. 2d 279; 2002 WL 334734
186 F.Supp.2d 279 (2002) In re CINAR CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION Phillip G. Kelley, Kathy H. Kelley, Michael G. Mayberry, and Sharon H. Mayberry, Plaintiffs, v. Cinar Corporation, Micheline Charest, and Ronald A. Weinberg, Defendants. Steven T. CARSON, Patricia L. Carson, and Janet B. Dellosa, Plaintiffs, v. Cinar Corporation, Cinar Holdings, Inc., Micheline Charest, Ronald A. Weinberg, and Hasanain Panju, Defendants. Ka
District Court, D. Maine · 2009-11-13 · Published · cited 3× · 672 F. Supp. 2d 149; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106366; 2009 WL 3807091
672 F.Supp.2d 149 (2009) Nulankeyutmonen NKIHTAQMIKON, Plaintiff, v. BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS, Defendant. No. CV-05-188-B-W. United States District Court, D. Maine. November 13, 2009. *150 David K. Mears, Justin E. Kolber, Patrick A. Parenteau, Teresa B. Clemmer, Environmental and Natural Resources Law Clinic, Vermont Law School,
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2021-04-29 · Published · cited 0×
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2823-16 PHOENIX PINELANDS CORPORATION, a New Jersey Corporation, APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION Plaintiff-Respondent, April 29, 2021 APPELLATE DIVISION v
District Court, D. Maine · 2009-03-04 · Published · cited 5× · 601 F. Supp. 2d 337; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19505; 2009 WL 604886
601 F.Supp.2d 337 (2009) Nulankeyutmonen NKIHTAQMIKON, Plaintiff, v. BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS, Department of the Interior, Defendants. No. CV-05-188-B-W. United States District Court, D. Maine. March 4, 2009. David K. Mears, Justin E. Kolber, Patrick A. Parenteau, Environmental and Natural Resources Law Clinic, Vermont Law School, South Royalton, VT, Lynne A. Willia