Cases

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 17-MAR-2025 12:35 PM Dkt. 21 OGAC SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX IN THE SUPREME COURT

ACCEPTED 15-25-00094-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 5/23/2025 3:28 PM NO. 15-25-00094-CV CHRISTOPHER A. P

ACCEPTED 15-25-00094-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

15-25-00101-CV ACCEPTED 15-25-00101-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/11/2025 10:46 AM NO. _____________ CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE _______________________________________

ACCEPTED 15-25-00094-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 5/22/2025 9:29 AM NO. 15-25-00094-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE ___________________________________________

ACCEPTED 15-25-00094-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 5/22/2025 11:01 PM NO. 15-25-00094-CV CHRISTOPHER

ACCEPTED 15-25-00101-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/12/2025 7:58 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE NO.

ACCEPTED 15-25-00101-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/12/2025 4:25 PM

15-25-00094-CV ACCEPTED 15-25-00094-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 5/21/2025 11:02 PM NO. ___________________ CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE _______________________________________

15-25-00101-CV ACCEPTED 15-25-00101-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/11/2025 7:52 AM NO. ___________________ CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE ___________________________________________

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia was presented to the court and briefed by the parties. The court has accorded the issues full consideration and has determined that they do not warrant a published opinion. For the reasons presented in the accompanying memorandum, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the

MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04- 05-00905-CV Emma CASSO; Elvia Laurel; and Ramiro R. Casso, M.D.; Appellants v. David Lee FULLERTON, Appellee From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No

Kurt S. Odenwald, Presiding Judge. Introduction Appellant Jill Barden (“Wife”) appeals from the judgment of the trial court modifying the dissolution decree dissolving her marriage to Respondent Theodore Barden (“Husband”). Wife presents three points on appeal. First, Wife asserts that the trial court erred in terminating Husband’s maintenan

CHIEF JUSTICE McGRATH delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 Chris Wagner appeals from the District Court’s dismissal of his claims at trial pursuant to M. R. Civ. P. 50. We affirm in part and reverse in part. ¶2 We restate the issues on appeal as follows:

Majority: MEAD, GORMAN, HJELM, and HUMPHREY, JJ. Dissent: ALEXANDER and. JABAR, JJ. GORMAN, J. [¶ 1] Alec T, and Emma L. Sabina appeal from a judgment entered in the Business and Consumer Docket (Murphy, J.) dismissing their action against JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., (Chase), in which they claimed that Chase failed to comply with the statute governing the discharge of a mortgag

SELYA, Circuit Judge. The lead-in to a serialized radio program, wildly popular in the mid-1900s, warned that “the weed of crime bears bitter fruit.” In his quest for naturalization (which rests at the epicenter of this appeal), the petitioner has learned that hard lesson at first hand. The tale follows. I. BACKGROUND Petitioner-

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs June 18, 2008 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MICHAEL TODD KIRKUP Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2006-D-3083 Cheryl Blackburn, Judge No. M2007-02066-CCA-R3-CD - Filed July 16, 2008 A Davidson County jury convicted the Defendant, Michael Todd Kirkup

519 F.Supp.2d 1119 (2007) BOYDSTUN METAL WORKS, INC., an Oregon corporation, Plaintiff, v. COTTRELL, INC., a Georgia corporation, Defendant. No. 06-CV-500-PK. United States District Court, D. Oregon. September 7, 2007. *1120 *1121 *1122

LYNCH, Circuit Judge. This appeal presents the question of whether the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) committed reversible error when it held that the Massachusetts crime of assault and battery with a dangerous weapon (“ABDW”), in violation of Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 265, § 15A(b), is categorically a crime involving moral turpitude (“CIMT”) under the Immigration and Nationality

OPINION CHUTICH, Justice. Respondent Anibal Sanchez sued appellant Dahlke Trailer Sales, Inc. (Dahlke) under the antiretaliation provision of the Minnesota workers’ compensation statute. Minn. Stat. § 176.82, subd. 1 (2016). The district court granted summary judgment to Dahlke, concluding that Sanchez had not raised a genuine issue of material fact about whether Dahlke discharged him because he sought wo