Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Emma Folsom”
Cash v. GRANITE SPRINGS RETREAT ASS'N, INC.public domain
248 P.3d 614 (2011) 2011 WY 25 Terry CASH; Richard J. Maturi; Craig McCune and Rhonda McCune; and Rich Nelson and Rebecca Hilliker, Appellants (Plaintiffs), v. GRANITE SPRINGS RETREAT ASSOCIATION, INC., a Wyoming Nonprofit Corporation; Lynn Williams-Haas; Ted and Emma Esquibel; J.T. and Aimee Walsh; John and Sylvia Passehl; Marty and Gail Gill; Cheryl and Doug Brown; Jacque Cash; Mary Maturi; Craig Folsom and April Walton;
Nampa Classical Academy v. Goeslingpublic domain
714 F.Supp.2d 1079 (2010) NAMPA CLASSICAL ACADEMY, et al., Plaintiffs v. William GOESLING, et al., Defendants. Case No. CV09-427-S-EJL. United States District Court, D. Idaho. May 17, 2010. *1084 Bruce David Skaug, Goicoechea Law Office, Nampa, ID, David Andrew Cortman, Alliance Defense Fund, Lawrenceville, GA, Gary S. McCaleb, A
Shaw v. Folsompublic domain
Beowií, J. By a charter-party dated August 29, 1887, the respondent engaged the libelant’s brig, the Emma L. Shaw, to proceed to Little1 Curagoa, and take a cargo of guano, to be delivered at Charleston, S. C., for a lump sum as freight of $2,500. The charterer contracted to load the ship with a cargo of guano, “not to exceed 850 tons.” He supposed that to be the full carrying capacity of the ship; bu
State of Tennessee v. Deandre D. Ruckerpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE April 22, 2015 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. DEANDRE D. RUCKER Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2012-A-471 Mark J. Fishburn, Judge No. M2014-00742-CCA-R3-CD – Filed July 9, 2015 The defendant, Deandre D. Rucker, was convicted of first degree premeditated murder and sentenced
Murray v. Mariner Healthpublic domain
994 So.2d 1051 (2008) Emma MURRAY, Petitioner, v. MARINER HEALTH and ACE USA, Respondents. No. SC07-244. Supreme Court of Florida. October 23, 2008. *1052 Richard A. Sicking, Coral Gables, FL, Brian O. Sutter, Port Charlotte, FL, and Bill McCabe of Shepherd, McCabe and Cooley, Longwood, FL, for Petitioner. Cheryl L. Wilke
Lucas v. Frazeepublic domain
CONOVER, Judge. Adrian Lucas (Lucas) appeals the trial court's refusal to rescind a deed she executed and delivered to Emma Frazee (Fra-zee). We affirm. ISSUE We restate the various contentions raised by the parties as the following single issue: Should the deed have been rescinded because its execution and delivery were procured by constructiv
Smith v. Consumers Oil & Shale Co.public domain
Mr. Justice Barnes delivered the opinion of the court.
Perdue ex rel. Perdue v. Greenpublic domain
PER CURIAM. In these consolidated appeals, Carol M. Perdue, individually and as next friend and guardian of her daughter, Anna K. Perdue; William D. Motlow, Jr.; and Shane Sears (hereinafter collectively referred to as “the objectors”), all of whom are objecting class members in class-action litigation related to the Alabama Prepaid Affordable College Tuition (“PACT”) Trust Fund a/k/a The Wallace-Folsom Prepaid College Tuiti
Adams v. Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining Co.public domain
STOCKSLAGER, C. J. Plaintiffs commenced their action in the district court of Shoshone county, alleging the death of Richard Adams on the thirtieth day of November, 1902, while in the employ of defendant corporation, and that his death was the result of the faulty construction and operation of a certain belt used for conveying the ore in the mill or concentrator of defendant, and the careless and negligent
Abel v. Robert Noble Estatepublic domain
In its inception this was a case brought by James Abel against the Robert Noble Estate to quiet title to certain lots in Boise City. In its answer Robert Noble Estate prayed that the Folsoms, Perkinses and Peters be brought in as cross-defendants, alleging that Abel's title was wrongfully deraigned through them and in fraud of defendant's rights. They were accordingly brought in as parties. The facts, as they appear from the record and the briefs of counsel, are hardly in dispute, so f
Galler v. Gallerpublic domain
32 Ill.2d 16 (1964) 203 N.E.2d 577 EMMA GALLER, Appellant, v. ISADORE A. GALLER et al., Appellees. No. 38475. Supreme Court of Illinois. Opinion filed November 24, 1964. Modified on denial of rehearing January 21, 1965. *17 ARVEY, HODES & MANTYNBAND, of Chicago, (BARNET HODES, SIDNEY R
Gordon v. McAfeepublic domain
Parella, J. This action was tried without a jury. The cause of action is one to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff on or about May 4, 1943, when struck by a portion of a ceiling which fell in the bathroom of the apartment occupied by her under a written lease. Plaintiff testified that oral notice of an alleged out-of-repair, cracked, defective and dangerous condi
Roberts v. Flemmingpublic domain
R. JASPER SMITH, District Judge. Plaintiff seeks review of the final decision of the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare denying his applications for establishment of a period of disability and for disability insurance benefits under the provisions of Sections 416 (i) and 423(c), 42 U.S.C.A. The cause is submitted here for judgment. Jurisdiction is conferred by Section 405(g), 42 U S.C.A., and by Section 10 of the Admin
Heck v. Cannonpublic domain
24 N.J. Super. 534 (1953) 95 A.2d 23 PETER J. HECK, SR., AND LILLIE MABEL HECK, PLAINTIFFS, v. EDNA CANNON, MARTIN CANNON, EDSALL HOLDING COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, WILLIAM ROLLER, GLADYS ROLLER, EVA CORNELL, MR. CORNELL, HUSBAND OF EVA CORNELL, AND HER UNKNOWN HEIRS, DEVISEES AND PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES, AND HIS, HER, THEIR OR ANY OF THEIR SUCCESSORS IN RIGHT, TITLE AND INTEREST; MR. RUSSELL, HUSBAND OF EMMA R
Holland v. Celebrezzepublic domain
WYCHE, District Judge. This is an action asking the District Court to review a final decision of the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, in accordance with § 205(g) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.A. § 405 (g)). The decision of the Secretary denied the plaintiff the period of disability and disability insurance benefits for which he applied. Plaintiff met the special earnings requirements in
Mohamed v. Mazda Motor Corp.public domain
90 F.Supp.2d 757 (2000) Abdul Ali MOHAMED, Individually And As Next Friend For, Shehrazade Mohamed, A Minor Child, And As Representative of the Estate of Dr. Khaduah Abdul Ali Mohamed, Plaintiffs, v. MAZDA MOTOR CORPORATION, and Mazda Motor of America, Inc., Defendants. No. 2:99-CV-0231(TH). United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Marshall Division. March 27, 2000.
Taylor v. Paynepublic domain
R.T. Richards died testate leaving no issue of his body, or adopted children, or lineal descendants of either, surviving him. His last will and testament was executed within six months prior to his death. His widow, Isabelle, was appointed by his will to serve as executrix without bond. At the time of his death Richards was the owner of a certain contract and a certain mortgage, the exact nature of which is not shown by the record, but upon which installments of money were payable to the owne
Haffenberg v. Grossbergpublic domain
Modified Opinion. Mr. Presiding Justice Friend delivered the opinion of the court. Esther Ruth Haffenberg and Nathan Haffenberg appeal from an order denying them leave to file a bill, predicated upon newly discovered evidence, to review a decree of the circuit court entered July 2, 1936, adjudicating in part the issues in case No. B-126,517, ent
Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining & Concentrating Co. v. Empire State-Idaho Mining & Developing Co.public domain
BEATTY, District Judge. Complainant, as owner of the Stemwinder Mining Claim, in bringing this action to quiet its title to an underground portion of the ledge thereof, admitting the priority of the Emma and Last Chance mining claims, makes no claim to any part of their surface area, nor to any portion of the ledge lying between the extend*269ed planes passing through the
Empire State-Idaho Mining & Developing Co. v. Bunker Hill & S. Mining & Concentrating Co.public domain
GILBERT, Circuit Judge, after stating the case as above, delivered the opinion of the court. It is assigned as error that the court overruled the plea which was filed by the appellant at the time of the hearing of the application for the injunction. The matter of the plea was, first, a former judgment between the two parties; and, second, another action pending. The plea of a former judgment alleges: That on