Cases

PAEZ, Circuit Judge: DefendanL-Appellant Wild Oats Market, Inc. (“Wild Oats”) appeals the district court’s order remanding this action to state court. Wild Oats removed this action to the District Court for the Central District of California alleging that, because the parties were completely diverse and the amount in controversy exceeded $75,000, diversity jurisdiction existed un

GUIDRY, Justice. | tThis case presents questions of statutory interpretation regarding amendments to Louisiana’s sex offender registration statutes, La.Rev.Stat. 15:540 et seq. We granted the State of Louisiana’s writ application to determine whether the court of appeal erred in finding that the amendments did not apply to the offender in this case, because application of those amended statutes would violate the pro

LEWIS, J. This case involves a Florida constitutional challenge to the 2013 amendments to sections 766.106 and 766.1065 of the Florida Statutes. Generally,-the statutes pertain to invasive presuit notice requirements that must be satisfied before a medical-negligence action may be filed, as well as an informal discovery process that accompanies that presuit notice process, and the amendments- at iss

SEE, Justice (concurring in the rationale in part and concurring in the result). I concur in the main opinion as to its resolution of all of the issues except one, as to which I concur only in the result. Trawiek argues that in her individual capacity she is entitled to immunity from Fred and Rhonda’s claim that she negligently and wantonly failed to warn Rhonda about the complaints of

987 A.2d 36 (2010) 412 Md. 288 Emma ELDER v. Cherry Elder SMITH, Personal Representative of the Estate of Colonel Percy Elder, Sr. No. 34 September Term, 2009. Court of Appeals of Maryland. January 13, 2010. *37 Harry Goldman, Jr. (Skeen, Goldman, LLP, Baltimore, MD), on brief, for Petitioner. Rando

OPINION GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice Appellants, who are owners and operators of existing hotels located near the El Paso International Airport, filed suit against the City of El Paso, its elected representatives (collectively referred to as the “City”), and a private third party, EP Vida, LLC (EP Vida). Appellants claimed that the City violated its charter

The plaintiffs have not plausibly alleged that they sustained any injury as *740shareholders of the Tarter Corporations that is not indirect or incidental to the Tarter Corporations' expenditure of costs and loss of cost savings. As a result, they lack standing to bring an individual capacity action to redress those injuries. However, the plaintiffs assert that they no

OPINION WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which GARY R. WADE, C.J., JANICE M. HOLDER, CORNELIA A. CLARK, and SHARON G. LEE, JJ., joined. *42 This appeal concerns the appropriate response when a trial co

NUMBER 13-26-00100-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG GALEN M. COTTON, LEONARD J. DURANTE, ANITA D. DURANTE, TIMOTHY J. VOGT, EMMA E. ORELLANA, JAMES C. LARUE JR., AND ELISABETH A. MCNINCH, Appellants, v. W. GREG SMITH, LORNE D. MONTGOMERY, AIMEE K. MONTGOMERY, AND SANDY CREEK AIRPORT, INC., Appellees.

USCA11 Case: 24-10086 Document: 45-1 Date Filed: 09/04/2025 Page: 1 of 34 FOR PUBLICATION In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-10086 ____________________ EMMA JANE PROSPERO,

PER CURIAM. Emma Rush is a 54-year old, African American woman. She worked for the State of Arkansas Department of Workforce Services (“ADWS”) as a Workforce Specialist. In November 2015, Rush applied for a promotion as a Program Supervisor. On December 9, 2015, ADWS informed Rush that she did not receive the promotion. Rush alleges she was not promot

Matter of Kayla K. (Emma P.-T.) (2022 NY Slip Op 02668) Matter of Kayla K. (Emma P.-T.) 2022 NY Slip Op 02668 Decided on April 22, 2022 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judic

893 N.E.2d 1137 (2008) Emma SMITH, Appellant-Plaintiff, v. GARY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION, Appellee-Defendant. No. 45A03-0802-CV-61. Court of Appeals of Indiana. September 25, 2008. Scott E. Yahne, Efron Efron & Yahne, P.C., Hammond, IN, Attorney for Appellant. Robert F. Peters, Brooke S. Shreve, Lucas Holcomb & Medrea, LLP, Merrillville, IN,

The opinion of the court was delivered by FISHER, J.A.D. “What’s in a name?”1 In this appeal, we examine the propriety of a presumption in favor of the parent of primary residence2 when seeking, over the other parent’s objection, a change in the surname of their two children. In two eases — Ronan v. Adely, 182 N.J. 103, 861 A

JAMES, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. This case arises out of a divorce action filed by Emma Bell against Sidney Stevenson Jr. A consent agreement was entered reserving two issues for trial: alimony and equitable division of the retirement and savings accounts. The trial court initially awarded Bell $400 per month for forty-eight months as a part of property div

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 17-PR-630 EMMA M. GOVAN, APPELLANT, v. JULIE EBNER BROWN, ET AL

394 S.C. 451 (2011) 716 S.E.2d 280 SANDLANDS C & D, LLC, and Express Disposal Service, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF HORRY, a Political Subdivision of the State of South Carolina, acting by and through its duly elected County Council, and Horry County Solid Waste Authority, Inc., Defendants. No. 27042. Supreme Court of South Carolina. Heard May 24, 2

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-13-00010-CR EMMA ANGELITA HENDERSON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 Hunt County, Texas Trial Court No. CR1200630 Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 1413.1 CAF 11-00832 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND GORSKI, JJ. IN THE MATTER OF EMMA J. CASWELL, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT, V ORDER DERRICK D. ORR, SR., RESPONDENT-PETITIONER-RESPONDENT. DAVISON LAW OFFICE PLLC, CANANDAIGUA (MARK C. DAVISON OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. P

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT EMMA GRIFFIN, Appellant, v. PALM BEACH COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, a Florida governmental entity, Appellee. No. 4D19-1396 [May 20, 2020] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth