⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Emily Nicole Fried”

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025-03-13 · Published · cited 0× · 131 F.4th 798
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-35440 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:22-cv- 00329-BLW v. STATE OF IDAHO, ORDER Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-35450 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:22-cv- 00329-BLW v. STATE OF IDAHO
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2021-04-22 · Published · cited 0× · 2021 Ark. 92
Cite as 2021 Ark. 92 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE SUSPENSION OF Opinion Delivered April 22, 2021 ATTORNEYS WHO FAILED TO PAY 2021 ANNUAL ATTORNEY- LICENSE FEE PER CURIAM The final deadline for attorneys to pay the 2021 annual attorney-license fee was April 15, 2021. Rule VII(C) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar imposes an automatic suspension on th
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2024-07-17 · Published · cited 0×
NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. DATE: 07/16/2024 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 15:10:52 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE
Cobell v. Nortonpublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2003-04-28 · Published · cited 0× · 260 F. Supp. 2d 93; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6986; 2003 WL 1960018
260 F.Supp.2d 93 (2003) Elouise Pepion COBELL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Gale A. NORTON, Secretary of the Interior, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 96-1285(RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. April 28, 2003. *94 Keith M. Harper, Native American Rights Fund, Washington, DC, Elliott H. Levitas, Kilpatrick Stockton
Cobell v. Nortonpublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2004-05-27 · Published · cited 2× · 319 F. Supp. 2d 36; 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9696; 2004 WL 1194649
319 F.Supp.2d 36 (2004) Elouise Pepion COBELL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Gale A. NORTON, Secretary of the Interior, et al., Defendants. Civ.A. No. 96-1285(RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. May 27, 2004. *37 *38 Dennis M. Gingold, Elliott H. Levitas, Kilpatrick Stockton, LL
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012-07-18 · Published · cited 0× · 878 F. Supp. 2d 298; 2012 WL 2926969; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99486
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER EDWARD F. HARRINGTON, Senior District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Settled and Released Claims and Time-Barred Claims from the Fifth Amended Complaint. The Court allows-in-part and denies-in-part the Defendants’ motion. Releases. After a review of the memoranda of the parties and releases submitted i
Cobell v. Nortonpublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2003-04-28 · Published · cited 1× · 260 F. Supp. 2d 110; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6984; 2003 WL 1960016
260 F.Supp.2d 110 (2003) Elouise Pepion COBELL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Gale A. NORTON, Secretary of the Interior, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 96-1285(RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. April 28, 2003. *113 Keith M. Harper, Native American Rights Fund, Washington, DC, Elliott H. Levitas, Kilpatrick Stockt
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013-07-18 · Published · cited 1× · 963 F. Supp. 2d 38; 2013 WL 3802433; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100432
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER HARRINGTON, Senior District Judge. Count One of the Plaintiffs’ Fifth Amended Complaint sets forth an allegation of an overarching conspiracy on the part of the Defendants, who are private equity firms, “to allocate the market for and artificially fix, maintain, or stabilize prices of securities in club LB Os in violation of § 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1.” Plaintiffs are
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023-01-05 · Published · cited 19× · 57 F.4th 66
19-3970 Freeman v. HSBC Holdings PLC United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit August Term 2020 Argued: February 1, 2021 Decided: January 5, 2023 No. 19-3970 CHARLOTTE FREEMAN, for the Estate of BRIAN S. FREEMAN, KATHLEEN SNYDER, RANDOLPH FREEMAN,
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013-08-07 · Published · cited 0×
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1103 KENNETH ACKERMAN; JAMES ACKERMAN; APRIL ACKERMAN; MARY ACKERMAN, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Thomas Ackerman; CHARLES V. ADAMS; CHRISTIANNE M. ADAMS; JOHN ALEXIS; CHARLES J. ARKINS; LULA M. ARKINS; THOMAS J. ARNO; AMY H. ARNO, Both individually and as next friends of A.A. and E.A.; R
Cobell v. Nortonpublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2003-04-28 · Published · cited 8× · 260 F. Supp. 2d 98; 2003 WL 1960020
260 F.Supp.2d 98 (2003) Elouise Pepion COBELL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Gale A. NORTON, Secretary of the Interior, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 96-1285(RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. April 28, 2003. *99 Keith M. Harper, Native American Rights Fund, Washington, DC, Elliott H. Levitas, Kilpatrick Stockton
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2020-08-13 · Published · cited 0×
NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. The current license status of a Pennsylvania attorney can be found on the Disciplinary Board’s website. https://www.padisciplinaryboard.org/for-the- public/find-attorney Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Attorneys Certified for Administrative Suspensi
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2014-12-30 · Published · cited 0×
CAUSE: 2001-CI-16843 ^ <\ MICHAEL THOMAS PAUL (PLAINTIFF) § IN THE DISTRICT COURr. o c VS § # 225 U. "- GREG AB30T ATTORNEY GENERAL § ' "~ FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS (DEFENDANT
Cobell v. Nortonpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004-09-29 · Published · cited 2× · 225 F.R.D. 41; 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19449; 2004 WL 2861410
MEMORANDUM OPINION LAMBERTH, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on the plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction [2646], filed August 25, 2004. Oral argument was heard on August 31, 2004, at which time a temporary restraining order was granted; and the Court ordered the Interior defendants to submit a supplemental memorandum in opposition to the plaintiffs’ motion, and the plain
Supreme Court of Alabama · 2015-03-03 · Published · cited 22× · 200 So. 3d 495; 2015 WL 892752
MOORE, Chief Justice (concurring specially). On June 26, 2015, by a bare 5-4 majority, the United States Supreme Court declared that all states must now recognize a fundamental right to “same-sex marriage.” Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. —, 135 S.Ct. 2584, 192 L.Ed.2d 609 (2015). Because the Alabama Supreme Court had previously issued orders in this case directing the probate judges of this State no
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014-01-30 · Published · cited 0× · 113 A.D.3d 1020; 979 N.Y.2d 548
Per Curiam. *1021The moving papers indicate that despite written notices sent to them by the Office of Court Administration at their last known address, respondents have failed to register and pay the required fee. Judiciary Law § 468-a (5) provides that noncompliance with the statute and rules regarding attorney registration “shall constitute conduc
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2023-06-02 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims Nos. 22-1380C, 22-1425C, 22-1436C, 22-1460C, 22-1462C, 22-1477C, 22-1492C, 22-1519C, 22-1549C, and 23-441C Filed: May 3, 2023 Re-issued: June 2, 20231 ________________________________________ ) ALLICENT TECHNOLOGY, LLC, et al., )
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014-01-30 · Published · cited 2× · 113 A.D.3d 1020; 979 N.Y.2d 548
Per Curiam. *1021The moving papers indicate that despite written notices sent to them by the Office of Court Administration at their last known address, respondents have failed to register and pay the required fee. Judiciary Law § 468-a (5) provides that noncompliance with the statute and rules regarding attorney registration “shall constitute conduc
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2021-11-04 · Published · cited 0×
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court