Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
5 opinions for “Emily McGuckin”
McGuckin v. Klinepublic domain
The Chancellor. The bill states in substance that Edmund B. MeGuckin, •on the 23d of April, 1860, was indebted to James B. MeGuckin in the sum of $2,000, for money lent and adyanced; that, in order to secure payment thereof, the former gave to che latter a deed of that date for an undivided third owned by him of certain land and premises described in the bill; that the deed, though absolute on its face, was intended for a mortgage; that
Bartlett v. Cameronpublic domain
OPINION BOSSON, Justice. {1} Petitioners are retired teachers, professors and other public education employees (collectively, Retirees) who seek a writ of mandamus against the New Mexico Education Retirement Board (ERB), which administers their retirement plan under the Educational Retirement Act (ERA). See NMSA 1978, § 2
Bartlett v. Cameronpublic domain
I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document New Mexico Compilation Commission, Santa Fe, NM '00'05- 15:59:53 2014.01.23 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: 2014-NMSC-002 Filing Date: Decem
In Re Declaratory Judgment Actions Filed by Variouspublic domain
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3323-15T1 IN RE DECLARATORY JUDGMENT ACTIONS FILED BY VARIOUS APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION MUNICIPALITIES, COUNTY OF OCEAN, PURSUANT TO THE July 11, 2016 SUPREME COURT'S DECISION IN
Spivey v. Board of Church Extensionpublic domain
ORDER KOVACHEVICH, District Judge. This cause is before the Court on the following motions, memoranda, and other filings: 1. Defendant South Brandon Community Church of God, Inc. (hereafter “South Brandon”), Motion to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support (Doc. Nos. 20-21, filed December 5, 1994), and response thereto (Doe. No. 81, filed February 10, 1995).