⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Emily Dunaway”

Tennessee Supreme Court · 2015-08-26 · Published · cited 27× · 479 S.W.3d 785; 2015 Tenn. LEXIS 695; 2015 WL 5027595
OPINION CORNELIA A. CLARK, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which SHARON G. LEE, C.J., and GARY R. WADE, JEFFREY S. BIVINS, and HOLLY KIRBY, JJ., joined. We granted permission to appeal to address two issues: (1) Whether the Governmental Tort Liability Act (“GTLA”), Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-20-10
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2011-05-20 · Published · cited 0× · 353 S.W.3d 121; 2011 Tenn. App. LEXIS 265; 2011 WL 1938516
OPINION D. MICHAEL SWINEY, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which HERSCHEL P. FRANKS, P.J., and CHARLES D. SUSANO, JR., J., joined. This case stems from the suspension and later termination of David G. Young *122
Tennessee Supreme Court · 2010-12-21 · Published · cited 56× · 329 S.W.3d 418; 2010 Tenn. LEXIS 1207
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE September 2, 2010 Session BOB FANNON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS A CITY COUNCILMAN FOR THE CITY OF LAFOLLETTE v. CITY OF LAFOLLETTE, ET AL. Appeal by Permission from the Court of Appeals Circuit Court for Campbell County No. 13947 John D. McAfee, Judge No. E2008-01616-SC-R11-CV - Fi
Muhammad v. Statepublic domain
Supreme Court of Georgia · 2007-06-29 · Published · cited 15× · 647 S.E.2d 560; 282 Ga. 247; 2007 Fulton County D. Rep. 2072; 2007 Ga. LEXIS 489
647 S.E.2d 560 (2007) MUHAMMAD v. The STATE. No. S07A0065. Supreme Court of Georgia. June 29, 2007. *561 Ray Burke Gary, Jr., J. Michael Treadaway, Treadaway & Treadaway, Marietta, for Appellant. Patrick H. Head, Dist. Atty., Dana J. Norman, Asst. Dist. Atty., Reuben M. Green, Asst. Dist. Atty., Thurbert E. Baker, Atty
People v. Harrispublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021-11-16 · Published · cited 1× · 2021 NY Slip Op 06331
People v Harris (2021 NY Slip Op 06331) People v Harris 2021 NY Slip Op 06331 Decided on November 16, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law
People v. Scottpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019-05-21 · Published · cited 0× · 2019 NY Slip Op 3905
People v Scott (2019 NY Slip Op 03905) People v Scott 2019 NY Slip Op 03905 Decided on May 21, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.<
People v. Harrispublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021-11-16 · Published · cited 1× · 2021 NY Slip Op 06331
People v Harris (2021 NY Slip Op 06331) People v Harris 2021 NY Slip Op 06331 Decided on November 16, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2022-12-23 · Published · cited 3× · 183 N.Y.S.3d 686; 78 Misc. 3d 1; 2022 NY Slip Op 22409
People v Nektalov (2022 NY Slip Op 22409) People v Nektalov 2022 NY Slip Op 22409 [78 Misc 3d 1] Accepted for Miscellaneous Reports Publication Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department, 2d, 11th and 13th Judicial Districts Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pur
People v. Jonespublic domain
Criminal Court of the City of New York · 2016-02-25 · Published · cited 1× · 51 Misc. 3d 863; 27 N.Y.S.3d 830
OPINION OF THE COURT Althea E. Drysdale, J. On December 21, 2015, a Dunaway/Johnson refusal hearing was held before this court. The People presented Detective James Southerton as a witness, and the defense presented no witnesses. The court credits the testimony of Detective Southerton and makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law. Statement of Facts
People v. Colonpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019-11-21 · Published · cited 0× · 2019 NY Slip Op 8449
People v Colon (2019 NY Slip Op 08449) People v Colon 2019 NY Slip Op 08449 Decided on November 21, 2019 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law §
People v. Chapmanpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020-04-23 · Published · cited 5× · 182 A.D.3d 862; 123 N.Y.S.3d 236; 2020 NY Slip Op 2330
People v Chapman (2020 NY Slip Op 02330) People v Chapman 2020 NY Slip Op 02330 Decided on April 23, 2020 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law §
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2013-04-30 · Published · cited 3× · 989 N.E.2d 784; 2013 WL 1809770; 2013 Ind. App. LEXIS 198
OPINION BARNES, Judge. Case Summary Ruben Pazmino appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Bose McKinney & Evans, LLP, (“Bose”) in the amount of $11,174.20. We reverse and remand. Issue Pazmino raises one issue, which we restate as whether the trial cour
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019-04-16 · Published · cited 38× · 921 F.3d 991
JORDAN, Circuit Judge, dissenting. This appeal presents an interesting case study for originalism, a set of related theories which (broadly speaking) call for constitutional provisions to be interpreted in accord with their understanding and meaning at the time of enactment or in accord with the intent of their framers. See, e.g., McDonald v. City of Chicago ,
People v. Spradlinpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020-11-25 · Published · cited 14× · 136 N.Y.S.3d 517; 188 A.D.3d 1454; 2020 NY Slip Op 06982
People v Spradlin (2020 NY Slip Op 06982) People v Spradlin 2020 NY Slip Op 06982 Decided on November 25, 2020 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013-01-28 · Published · cited 26× · 706 F.3d 1321; 90 Fed. R. Serv. 711; 2013 WL 309052; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 1901
FRIEDMAN, District Judge: In this appeal, we are asked to review the district court’s interpretation of an exclusion in a title insurance policy issued by the appellee, First American Title Insurance Company, to a Georgia bank, Farmers State Bank, and the district court’s decision that First American was entitled to summary judgment based on that exclusion. We affirm the distr
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018-03-22 · Published · cited 0× · 885 F.3d 1313
DUFFEY, District Judge: This appeal requires us to consider whether the pat down of a burglary suspect and the identification of a round of ammunition in the suspect's pocket constitutionally allowed the officer to retrieve the round and another item from the suspect's pocket. I. BACKGROUND A. Facts
Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2020-08-28 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2019-CA-00809-COA CHRISTOPHER WALTER POND APPELLANT v. WANDA CARLEEN POND APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/12/2019 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. TROY FARRELL ODOM COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: RANKIN COUNTY CHANCERY COURT ATTOR
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018-06-21 · Published · cited 0× · 2018 NY Slip Op 4605
People v Richardson (2018 NY Slip Op 04605) People v Richardson 2018 NY Slip Op 04605 Decided on June 21, 2018 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2021-12-22 · Published · cited 0×
12/22/2021 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE November 9, 2021 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MARTIN RILEY, III Appeal from the Criminal Court for Putnam County No. 2018-CR-1148 Gary McKenzie, Judge ___________________________________
People v. Bowmanpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021-05-06 · Published · cited 14× · 146 N.Y.S.3d 686; 194 A.D.3d 1123; 2021 NY Slip Op 02846
People v Bowman (2021 NY Slip Op 02846) People v Bowman 2021 NY Slip Op 02846 Decided on May 6, 2021 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.