Cases

464 F.Supp.2d 35 (2006) Karen Anne LENTZ and Gerald A. Lentz, Jr., Plaintiffs, v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, Defendant. Civil Action No. 06-1374 (ESH). United States District Court, District of Columbia. December 18, 2006. *36 Aaron M. Levine, Brandon J. Levine, Renee Lynne Robinson-Meyer, Steven Jay Lewis, Aaron M. Levine & Asso

515 F.Supp.2d 18 (2007) Lisa M. DEAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ELI LILLY & CO., Defendant. Civil Action No. 06-1375 (EGS). United States District Court, District of Columbia. June 1, 2007. *19 Aaron M. Levine, Brandon J. Levine, Renee Lynne Robinson-Meyer, Steven Jay Lewis, Aaron M. Levine & Associates, P.A., Washington, DC

535 F.Supp.2d 49 (2008) Suzanne R. ROBINSON et al., Plaintiffs, v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, Defendant. Civil Action No. 07-153 (RWR). United States District Court, District of Columbia. February 26, 2008. *50 Aaron M. Levine, Brandon J. Levine, Renee Lynne Robinson-Meyer, Steven Jay Lewis, Aaron M. Levine & Associates, P.A., Wa

FINAL COPY 309 Ga. 612 S20A0865. KIM v. THE STATE. MELTON, Chief Justice. Following a bench trial, Appellant Ki Song Kim appeals his convictions for murder and other offenses in connection with the stabbing deaths of Young Chan Choi (“Mr. Choi”) and Sun Hee Choi (“Mrs. Choi”).1 In his sole enumeration of error, Kim claims that the 1 The crimes occurred on July 27, 2013. On October 23, 2013, a Gwinnett County grand jury indicted Kim for the foll

310 Ga. 892 FINAL COPY S20A1297. BUTLER v. THE STATE. S20A1298. AVERY v. THE STATE. LAGRUA, Justice. Demarco Butler and Antonio Avery were tried jointly by a DeKalb County jury and convicted of murder and other crimes in connection with a shooting incident that killed Jordan Collins and wounded his brother, Chad Collins. Butler appeals, contending that the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions and that the trial court erred when i

350 S.W.3d 813 (2011) Melbourne MILLS, Jr; Bertha Darlene La; J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.; and Commonwealth of Kentucky, Appellants, v. Mildred ABBOTT; Lisa Abraham; Juanita Alton; Joann Alvey; Cindy Armstrong; Linda Back; Carla Baldwin; Lee Bartley, Jr; Patricia Belcher; Leisa Belding: Eleanor Berry; Margie Berry; Carol Boggs; Angie Bowman; James Branham; Kathy Branham; Norma Brewer; Karen Brown; Deborah Browning; Nathaniel Brumfield, on behalf

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 16-30188 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 1:15-cr-00254-BLW-1 GREGORY OBENDORF, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho B. Lynn Winmill, Chief District Judge, Presidin

314 Ga. 854 FINAL COPY S22A0511. DRENNON v. THE STATE. WARREN, Justice. Appellant Carlos Drennon appeals from his convictions for malice murder and participation in criminal street gang activity stemming from the shooting death of Randy Griffin.1 On appeal, 1 Griffin was killed on June 10, 2007. On June 27, 2008, Drennon and 11 other defendants were charged in a 60-count indictment returned by a Fulton County grand jury. Drennon was indicted on 15 counts

LAMBERT, Justice. We are confronted again with the issue of sovereign immunity, a doctrine of law created by Section 231 of the Constitution of Kentucky. For decades this Court has struggled with whether various governmental entities are entitled to the protection of sovereign immunity, and of those which are, whether statutes or conduct of the immune entity amount to an express or an implied waiver. At issue here is whether t

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge KAVANAUGH. KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judge: The Clean Air Act requires EPA to set national ambient air quality standards, or NAAQS. Those standards limit the levels of common pollutants in the ambient air. See 42 U.S.C. § 7409(a). Under the Act, individual States are responsible for ensuring attainm

ACCEPTED 13-15-00012-CV THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 5/4/2015 3:41:45 PM DO

Opinion of the Court by Justice VENTERS. This case arose in the aftermath of the settlement of Darla S. Guard, et' ál. v. American Home Products, Inc. (Guard).1 The Guard case, which is also known as “Jonetta Moore, et al. v. American Home Products, Inc.,” or the “Moore ” case, was brought by Kentucky residents who had taken th

Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court

Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr

Tuhley, J. delivered the opinion of the court. In the year 1S17, Eliza R. Gardner, daughter of Henry Gardner, was married to Samuel G. Chester, in the State of North Carolina. In the year 1818, Henry Gardner departed this life, having previously made and published his last will and testament by which he devised to his daughter, the said Eliza, two slaves, Sam and Maria; to another daughter, Emily, two slaves, B

Tuhley, J. delivered the opinion of the court. In the year 1S17, Eliza R. Gardner, daughter of Henry Gardner, was married to Samuel G. Chester, in the State of North Carolina. In the year 1818, Henry Gardner departed this life, having previously made and published his last will and testament by which he devised to his daughter, the said Eliza, two slaves, Sam and Maria; to another daughter, Emily, two slaves, B

Tuhley, J. delivered the opinion of the court. In the year 1S17, Eliza R. Gardner, daughter of Henry Gardner, was married to Samuel G. Chester, in the State of North Carolina. In the year 1818, Henry Gardner departed this life, having previously made and published his last will and testament by which he devised to his daughter, the said Eliza, two slaves, Sam and Maria; to another daughter, Emily, two slaves, B

WALKER, J. This was a suit in trespass to try title involving the Kellogg grant of 1,107 acres in San Augustine county. Judgment was in favor of appellee on an instructed verdict, from which appeal has been prosecuted to this court. This is the second appeal. On the first trial appellants were plaintiffs and J. R. Chapman was defendant. That trial was to a jury with judgment in favor of Chapman, from which appeal was prosecu

Sherwood, J., dissenting. This suit was commenced on the 16th day of September, 1882. The plaintiff in this ■case was a physician and surgeon, and a professor of surgery in the University of Michigan, and had been during the previous ten years. He brought his suit against the defendant for libel, in the Superior Court of the city of Detroit, for the publication of an article in the Evening News on the 11th day of Sept ber