Cases

ACCEPTED 01-15-00101-CR FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 8/31/2015 7:47:13 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

823 So.2d 1 (2001) ToForest Onesha JOHNSON v. STATE of Alabama. CR-98-0391. Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama. June 29, 2001. Rehearing Denied August 17, 2001. *9 John William Cole, Birmingham, for appellant. ToForest Johnson, pro se. Bill Pryor, atty. gen., and Thomas F. Parker IV, asst. atty. g

40 F.Supp.2d 178 (1999) Shirley UGARTE, Plaintiff, v. Roger JOHNSON, Dan Heimowitz, Maryann Musumeci, Defendants. No. 96 Civ. 6780(JSR). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 19, 1999. Edward A. Schneider, New York City, for Plaintiff. Marianne O'Toole, U.S. Atty's Office, Southern District of New York, New York City, for Defendants.

KNIGHT, District Judge. This is a suit for infringement of patent No. 1,805,403, issued May 12, 1931, application filed April 26, 1929; patent No. 1,841,187, issued January 12, 1932, application filed December 4, 1928; and patent No. 1,841,247, issued January 12, 1932, application filed June 30, 1928, renewed September 19, 1931. Each of these patents was issued to one Theodore Johnson and by him assigned to the plaintiff Joh

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 598 U. S. Part 2 Pages 617–622 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT May 18, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ

The opinion of the court was delivered by Stegall, J.: *434**733A jury convicted exotic dancer Sheena Thomas of one count of aggravated battery with a deadly weapon against her fellow dancer, Traci Borntrager. The attack occurred at an establishment called

323 F.3d 1210 Daniel ABELEIN, Susan Abelein, William E. Allen, Lars Andres, Henry Andrew, Henry Andrew, Karla Andrew, Robert Andrews, Carol Andrews, Roy Barnes, Antonette Barnes, Ernest Bartak, Ann Bartak, Clarence Beardsley, Janice Beardsley, Martin Beltran, Jeffry Bergamyer, Nadine Bergamyer, Robert Bergevin, Grace Bergevin, Donald Berry, Helen Berry, Gary Blackburn, Margaret Blackburn, Eugene Botkins, Sandra Bradford, David Britton, Judy Britton

MOORE, Judge. Douglas S. Dickinson and Barbara Dickinson (“the Dickinsons”) appeal from a judgment of the Shejby Circuit Court (“the trial court”), entered on April 10, 2014, determining that James H. Suggs, Ruth E. Suggs, and the .James H. & Ruth E. Suggs Revocable Trust (“the.,Suggses”) had acquired certain property .located in Shelby County from the Dickinsons by adverse possession. We affirm in part and reverse in

CARLEY, Presiding Justice. In a joint trial, a jury found Appellants Clifton Dean Moon and Bobby Leon Martin guilty of felony murder during the commission of criminal attempt to commit armed robbery, possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, and possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime, but not guilty of malice murder and possession of a handgun during the commission of malice murder. The trial court entere

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NETCHOICE, LLC, No. 25-146 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 5:24-cv-07885- EJD v. ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of California, OPINION Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 598 U. S. Part 2 Pages 631–650 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT May 25, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ

Filed 5/27/21 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO THE PEOPLE, B300167 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BA464605) v. JESSALYN KENDY GRAHAM, Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles C

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A21-0070 A21-0583 Court of Appeals Procaccini, J. Concurring, Gaïtas, J., Hudson, C.J. State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs.

[Cite as State v. Williams, 2021-Ohio-3491.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 18AP-891 v. : (C.P.C. No. 17CR-6553) Joseph L. Williams,

Reversed and Rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed May 27, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-19-00095-CV SAN JACINTO RIVER AUTHORITY, Appellant V. ANDY RAY, ET AL., Appellees1 On Appeal from the 125th District Court H

JOHN MAUZY PITTMAN, Judge. | )This dispute involves two separate parcels of land in Searcy County. Appellants Kevin Horton and Laurie Horton claimed an easement along a path over land belonging to appellees Brent Taylor and Robin Taylor. The parties’ tracts are contiguous and were once owned by the Mason family. The circuit court denied that claim. Appellants also claimed adverse possession of land ly

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2021-CA-00891-COA DANA M. PATRICK APPELLANT v. CHRISTOPHER L. PATRICK APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/06/2021 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. TROY FARRELL ODOM COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: RANKIN COUNTY CHANCERY COURT ATTORNE

Phipps, Judge. After being charged with two counts of violating the Georgia Controlled Substances Act, Richard Dixson filed a motion to suppress evidence seized during a traffic stop. The trial court conducted an evidentiary hearing, and then granted Dixson’s motion to suppress. The state claims that the traffic stop was legal and that Dixson’s arrest was supported by probable cause. We conclude that the initial stop was impro

Filed 9/8/25 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION * IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STEVEN KRUITBOSCH, F087809 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. BCV-23-101448) v. BAKERSFIELD RECOVERY SERVICES,

Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Mary Theresa Keating, Misc. Docket AG No. 46, September Term 2019. Opinion by Hotten, J. ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE – SANCTIONS – INDEFINITE SUSPENSION – The Court of Appeals indefinitely suspended Mary Theresa Keating (“Respondent”) from the practice of law in Maryland with a right to reapply in six months. This Court found that Respondent violated Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct (“MARPC”) 19- 303.3 (Candor Toward the Tribunal) and 19-308