⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Ellis v. CitiBank NA”

Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2012-06-20 · Published · cited 2× · 94 So. 3d 972; 2012 WL 2328001; 2012 La. App. LEXIS 873
MOORE, J. hJoy Carleta Ellis and Darrel DeWayne Walters, pro se, appeal a summary judgment ordering them to pay the balance due on a promissory note and recognizing a mortgage on their real property. We affirm. Factual and Procedural Background In July 1997, the Walterses took out a home equity loan from Hibernia National Bank. They executed an “Equity Prime-line” note f
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016-08-22 · Published · cited 2× · 202 F. Supp. 3d 209; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111590; 2016 WL 4445464
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS (Docket No. 7) HILLMAN, District Judge. Carol Proal (Plaintiff) brings this lawsuit to challenge the foreclosure of her home, *212which occurred in January of 2010. She asserts a bevy of claims, seeking to show that an assignment of the mortgage was void and that JP Morgan Chase & C
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023-08-02 · Published · cited 11× · 194 N.Y.S.3d 136; 219 A.D.3d 433; 2023 NY Slip Op 04098
Bank of Am., N.A. v Gonzalez (2023 NY Slip Op 04098) Bank of Am., N.A. v Gonzalez 2023 NY Slip Op 04098 Decided on August 2, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary L
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008-09-15 · Published · cited 56× · 542 F.3d 463; 2008 WL 4113964
542 F.3d 463 (2008) Mark NEWBY, et al.; Plaintiffs, v. ENRON CORPORATION, et al.; Defendants. Fleming & Associates, LLP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Andrew S. Fastow; Bank of America Corp.; Credit Suisse First Boston; Barclays, PLC; Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce; Merrill Lynch & Company, Inc.; J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.; Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc.; Banc of America Securities, LLC; Financial Institution Defendants; Bank o
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020-12-31 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA20-78 Filed: 31 December 2020 Mecklenburg County, No. 18 CVS 18069 PIA TOWNES, Plaintiff, v. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC, Defendant. Appeal by Plaintiff from an order entered 16 August 2019 and judgment entered 7 October 2019 by Judge Robert C. Ervin in Superior Court, Mecklenburg County. Appeal and cross-appeal by Defendant from same and
District Court, S.D. New York · 2014-02-24 · Published · cited 3× · 998 F. Supp. 2d 293; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22975; 2014 WL 704308
OPINION & ORDER PAUL A. CROTTY, District Judge: Plaintiff Paulette Cameron claims that Defendants violated her rights under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) and related state laws by filing a time-barred lawsuit to collect a debt from her. Defendants contend that the New York City Civil Court has already resolved this matter pursuant to a stipulated settlement agreement. Defend
Saaidi v. CFAS, LLCpublic domain
District Court, N.D. New York · 2010-09-17 · Published · cited 4× · 740 F. Supp. 2d 357; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97963; 2010 WL 3724878
740 F.Supp.2d 357 (2010) Huda SAAIDI, Plaintiff, v. CFAS, LLC, individually and d/b/a EDIFI; and John Braat, Defendants. No. 1:08-cv-1096 (GLS/DRH). United States District Court, N.D. New York. September 17, 2010. *359 Akin, Smith Law Firm, Derek T. Smith, Esq., Ismail S. Sekendiz, Esq., of Counsel, New York, NY, for the Plaintif
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011-02-23 · Published · cited 14× · 637 F.3d 117; 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 3512; 2011 WL 612887
KATZMANN, Circuit Judge: The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) delimits the proper venues in which a debt collector may bring a legal action to collect on a consumer debt. In pertinent part, the FDCPA’s venue provisions require that such actions be brought “only in the judicial district or similar legal entity ... in which [the] consumer resides at the commencement of
West Virginia Supreme Court · 2017-02-09 · Published · cited 43× · 238 W. Va. 465; 796 S.E.2d 574; 2017 W. Va. LEXIS 64
Davis, Justice: This appeal originates from a dispute between a pharmacy network administrator and various West Virginia pharmacies that are network members. Stemming from an order of the Circuit Court of McDowell County that refused to compel arbitration, this appeal raises three dispositive issues challenging the circuit court’s rulings as to: (1) whether a contractual choice of
District Court, W.D. Texas · 2014-07-24 · Published · cited 0× · 34 F. Supp. 3d 662; 2014 WL 3672971; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101191
ORDER KATHLEEN CARDONE, District Judge. On this day, the Court considered the above-captioned case. Because False Statement, 18 U.S.C. § 1001, does not constitute a sex offense as defined by the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act, 42 U.S.C. § 16901 et seq. (“SOR-NA”), it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant shall not be required to register as a sex offender as a condition of supervised
District Court, C.D. Illinois · 2017-06-05 · Published · cited 3× · 256 F. Supp. 3d 810; 2017 WL 2427297; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85543
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Sue E. Myerscough, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE . This matter came before the Court on January 19, 2016, for a bench trial. The first phase of the bench trial was completed on February 17, 2016. The trial resumed, on October 26, 2016. The Court heard testimony on October 25-27, 2016 and November 2, 2016. The Plaintiff United States appeared by Assistant United States A
District Court, D. Nevada · 2014-05-28 · Published · cited 0× · 29 F. Supp. 3d 1338; 2014 WL 2927148; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73285
ORDER GLORIA M. NAVARRO, Chief Judge. Pending before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 539) of the Honorable Cam Fer-enbach, United States Magistrate Judge, entered on January 28, 2014. On February 14, 2014, the Muir Law Firm, LLC and Timothy J. Muir (collectively the “Muir Defendants”) filed their Limited Objection (ECF No. 541) and AMG Services Inc., SFS, Inc., Red Ce
District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009-04-02 · Published · cited 1× · 627 F. Supp. 2d 786; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28013; 2009 WL 929044
627 F.Supp.2d 786 (2009) In Re: COMMERCIAL MONEY CENTER, INC., EQUIPMENT LEASE LITIGATION. Case No. 1:02CV16000. MDL Docket No. 1490. This Order Relates To Case No. 02CV16014. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. April 2, 2009. *789 Howard J.C. Nicols, James A. Vollins, Thomas S. Babel, Thomas S. Kilbane, Squire, Sa
District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010-07-27 · Published · cited 11× · 737 F. Supp. 2d 815; 83 Fed. R. Serv. 232; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90804; 2010 WL 2991526
737 F.Supp.2d 815 (2010) In re COMMERCIAL MONEY CENTER, INC., Equipment Lease Litigation. Case No. 1:02CV16000. MDL Docket No. 1490. This Order Relates To Case Nos. 02CV16010, 02CV16012, 02CV16014, 02CV16019, 02CV16020, 02CV16022. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. July 27, 2010. *817 Buckley King, Howard JC Nicol
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018-02-23 · Published · cited 366× · 883 F.3d 68
Gerard E. Lynch, Circuit Judge: This case is one of dozens seeking to recover for harm allegedly resulting from a conspiracy among major banks to manipulate the London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR"), a set of benchmark interest rates that affect financial transactions worth trillions of dollars. Plaintiffs-Appellants Charles Schwab Corporation, Charles Schwab Bank, N.A., Charles Sch
Marvin v. Pflueger.public domain
Hawaii Supreme Court · 2012-04-27 · Published · cited 86× · 127 Haw. 490; 280 P.3d 88; 2012 WL 1949155; 2012 Haw. LEXIS 122
Concurring and Dissenting Opinion by ACOBA, J. The majority forecloses Respondenf/De-fendant-Appellant James Pflueger1 (Pflueger) from joining Heidi Huddy-Yamamoto (Huddy-Yamamoto), the owner of one-third of the kuleana parcel at issue, the Haena Kuleana (hereinafter referred to as Haena Kuleana or the kuleana), in the lawsuit for access and water
District Court, E.D. California · 2006-09-25 · Published · cited 8× · 456 F. Supp. 2d 1160; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94709; 2006 WL 2734359
456 F.Supp.2d 1160 (2006) CENTRAL VALLEY CHRYSLER-JEEP, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Catherine E. WITHERSPOON,, in her official capacity as Executive Director of the California Air Resources Board, et al., Defendants. No. CV F 04-6663 AWI LJO. United States District Court, E.D. California. September 25, 2006. *1161
District Court, S.D. Florida · 2002-02-19 · Published · cited 38× · 211 F.R.D. 457; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22066; 2002 WL 31512705
ORDER CERTIFYING SETTLEMENT CLASS AND APPROVING CONSENT DECREE GOLD, District Judge. THIS CAUSE is before the Court pursuant to the Court’s June 7, 2001 Order Concerning Settlement Fairness Hearing, and the parties’ June 2, 2001 submission of a Joint Motion for Order Granting Preliminary Approval of Proposed Consent Decree; Conditionally Certifying the Settlement Class; Directing Notice to the Cla
District Court, E.D. New York · 2014-03-31 · Published · cited 148× · 13 F. Supp. 3d 179; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44993; 2014 WL 1330941
MEMORANDUM & ORDER MARGO K. BRODIE, District Judge: Plaintiff Sylvia Bowen-Hooks brings the above-captioned action against Defendants City of New York, Commissioner David Frankel, Sheriff Lindsay Eason, Chief of Operations Timothy LaRose, First Deputy Sheriff Oliver Pu-Folkes and Chief of Staff Peter Sammarco, alleging claims of race and gender discrimination, retaliation
District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2007-05-16 · Published · cited 5× · 245 F.R.D. 358; 69 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 77; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35760; 100 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1197; 2007 WL 1443114
*362 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION WILSON, District Judge. Pending is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification,1 to which Defendants have responded.2 A Class Certification Hearing was held May 31, 2006. After the hearing, both