Cases

SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ Case No. 6D2026-2058 Lower Tribunal No. 2026-CA-000463 _____________________________ ALEXANDER ELLIOTT GONZALEZ, individually, and as Trustee of the ALEXANDER ELLIOTT GONZALEZ TRUST, Petitioner,

THOMAS, J. Appellant seeks reversal of a jury verdict arising out of a complaint filed by his siblings, Appellees, for negligent handling of a corpse, negligent infliction of emotional distress, and diminution of property value. The claims are based on Appellant’s dismembering of their mother’s corpse, burning it in a barrel, and scattering the remains on the family’s farm without disclosing the location of the remains. The ju

OPINION KIRSCHER, Bankruptcy Judge. Debtor Edward E. Elliott (“Elliott”) appeals an order sustaining the objection of appellee, chapter 7 1 trustee Diane C. Weil (“Trustee”), to his claimed homestead exemption under Cal. Crv. Pitoc. Code § 704.730(a)(3). The bankruptcy court sustained Trustee’s

CONCURRING OPINION Bob Pemberton, Justice While I join in the Court’s judgment conditionally granting mandamus relief, I *468must respectfully differ with its reasoning. The Court can—and should—resolve this discovery-related original proceeding without need to address the intricacies of the Texas Citizens Participation Act (TCPA).

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-16-00231-CV In re Chris Elliott ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY CONCURRING OPINION While I join in the Court’s judgment conditionally granting mandamus relief, I must respectfully differ with its reasoning. The Court can—and should—resolve this discovery- related origi

12/12/2018 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs November 15, 2018 BRUCE ELLIOTT v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Trousdale County No. 2018-CV-4695 John D. Wootten, Jr., Judge ______________

In the Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-23-00057-CR JACKIE LYNN ELLIOTT, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law Van Zandt County, Texas Trial Court No. CR21-00323 Before Stevens, C.J., van Cleef and Rambin, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Rambin

PER CURIAM: Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Thompson, /.), granting defendants’ motions for summary judgment. We hold that, in the absence of prejudice to an appellee, we read a pro se appellant’s appeal from an order closing the case as constituting an appeal from all prior orders. In an accompanying summary order, we affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment.

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS Nos. 15-CV-524 and 15-CV-559 WILFRED WELSH, APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE,

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-22-00899-CV IN RE Jasmine ELLIOTT Original Proceeding 1 PER CURIAM Sitting: Irene Rios, Justice Beth Watkins, Justice Lori I. Valenzuela

FILED DEC 10 2014 SUSAN M. SPRAUL, CLERK 1 U.S. BKCY. APP. PANEL OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT 2 3 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL 4 OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT 5 In

Cite as 2024 Ark. App. 514 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION III No. CV-24-82 Opinion Delivered October 23, 2024 GEORGIA HARRIS AND CHRISTOPHER APPEAL FROM THE LOGAN ELLIOTT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, APPELLANTS NORTHERN DISTRICT

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________ No. 06-03-00054-CR

PHILLIPS, Chief Justice, delivered the opinion of the Court, in which GONZALEZ, HECHT, ENOCH, and BAKER, Justices, joined. The issue presented is whether an attorney who negligently drafts a will or trust agreement owes a duty of care to persons intended to benefit under the will or trust, even though the attorney never represented the intended beneficiaries. The court of appeals h

F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH FEB 24 1997 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

NO. 12-01-00024-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS LLOYD S. ELLIOTT,§ APPEAL FROM THE 241ST</

BRISCOE, Circuit Judge. Defendant Asta M. Eliott, convicted and sentenced for possession of marijuana with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(C), appeals the denial of her motion to suppress evidence. We reverse and remand. *-772 I.

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 363 Jerry Lee Elliott appeals from a conviction for delivery of a controlled substance. A jury found Elliott guilty of delivery of methamphetamines by constructive transfer and, having found the enhancement paragraph of the indictment to be true, assessed his punishment at sixty years of confinement and a fine o

732 F.Supp. 954 (1990) Wilson R. ELLIOTT, Plaintiff, v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION, Defendant. No. S88-598. United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division. March 5, 1990. *955 Michael K. Banik, Elkhart, Ind., for plaintiff. Jeffrey H. Burton, Philadelphia, Pa., and Terrence F. Wozniak, South Bend, Ind.,

385 So.2d 1074 (1980) E.B. ELLIOTT, Jr., Individually and As One of the Last Officers and Directors of Spruce-up Corporation, a Dissolved Florida Corporation and As One of the Last Officers and Directors of Automatic Vending Service, Inc., a Dissolved Florida Corporation, Appellant, v. SHERIDAN, INC., a Foreign Corporation, Appellee. No. 79-1416. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.