Cases

ELLIOTT, District Judge. This is an action brought under the provisions of Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, as amended (42 U.S. C. § 405(g)) to review a decision of the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare. Plaintiff filed an application for survivor’s insurance benefits on August 25, 1964 based on the earnings record of Joe J. Kersey, deceased. The application was for mother’s insurance be

565 A.2d 913 (1989) Mary Kersey MILLER and Earl Miller, Plaintiffs Below, Appellants, v. SUBURBAN PROPANE GAS CORPORATION, a corporation of State of New Jersey, Defendant Below, Appellee. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted: September 28, 1989. Decided: October 17, 1989. Robert C. Wolhar, Jr., of Wolhar & Gill, Georgetown, for appellants. W. Wade W. Scot

471 S.E.2d 174 (1996) Charles ALSTON, Jr., Fred Anderson, David Arledge, John Arledge (Retiree), Linda Barfield, Robert H. Berry, Wallace E. Berry, Shirley Boan, John Thomas Bowers, Jack Bradley, James Burkett, Tony Burns, Chris Carter, Barbara Cauthen, James Chambers, Jr., Bill Collins, Pat D'Alessio, Herman L. Davis, James Richard Davis, Sr., Matthew Sharpe Davis, Terry Drakeford, Phil Elliott, Edward Fant, Cal Fowler, John Furniss, Neal Gainey, Curtis

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON MARCH 1998 SESSION STATE OF TENNESSEE, * No. 02C01-9710-CR-00383 Appellee, * Shelby County vs. * Hon. James C. Beasley, Jr., Judge MARIA MACLIN, * (Second Degree Murder) Appellant. *

Elliott, J. — The substance of the appellant's complaint is this: He entered the service of the appellee as a brakeman, and his duties required him to set the brakes upon the trains on which he was required to work. On the 13th day of December, 1887, he was working on a freight train composed of many cars. He was signaled to set the brake. He undertook to discharge this duty in obedience to the signal,

CYR, Circuit Judge. Appellee Sheree A. Carter, a state prison guard, filed suit against the State of Rhode Island, eight of her supervisors or superior officers, and her union, alleging race and gender discrimination. Four individual defendants, among the eight individual defendants who initiated this interlocutory appeal, challenge a district court order disallowing their “qual

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1582 JIHAD ADBUL-MUMIT; MATTHEW ABEDI; MONICA ADAIR SARGENT; MARK AGEE; ALIZ AGOSTON; YVONNE ALSTON; DAN AMATRUDA; KRISTY AMBROSE; KIMBERLEY AMICK; WANDA G. AMOS; CHRISTOPHER ARAUZA; CARL ARSENAULT; BROOKE ASHER; MICHELLE ATKINS; RAYMOND O. ATKINS; MATTHEW ATWELL; DAVID AUB; SOHA AYYASH; ASIF AZIZ; SUSAN BAILEY; KAREN BAKER; HAB BA

[Cite as State v. Rose, 2012-Ohio-5607.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : CASE NO. CA2011-11-214 Plaintiff-Appellee, : OPINION

USCA1 Opinion UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT ____________________ No. 95-1082 SHEREE A. CARTER, Plaintiff, Appellee,

OPINION LASTER, Vice Chancellor. Defendant Georgi Dimitrov moved to vacate the entry of default judgment against him. His motion is granted. I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND The facts are drawn from the Verified Complaint (the “Complaint”) and the materials submitted by the parties during post-default proceedings. A

376 N.E.2d 1159 (1978) PALACE BAR, INC., an Indiana Corporation, Herman Walters and Ruth Walters, d/b/a the Palace Bar and Nell Lynn, Appellants (Defendants below), v. Rosetta FEARNOT, As Surviving Spouse and Administratrix of the Estate of Garlen Fearnot, Deceased, Appellee (Plaintiff below). No. 1-177A9. Court of Appeals of Indiana, First District. April 19, 1978.

Elliott, C. J. The relator’s complaint is based on the official bond of Milton R. Hiatt, executed by him as principal, and by the other appellants as sureties, to secure the faithful performance of his duties as treasurer of the board of school trustees of the school town of Ridgeville. The breach alleged is the failure of Hiatt to turn over to the relator, who was duly elected his successor, the school funds in his hands.

BARD, District Judge. Various petitions for the allowance of fees are before the Court in the above captioned case. Petitions for that purpose were filed by Thomas C. Buchanan and Robert C. Sproul, Jr., the two Receivers and Trustees, by their counsel, Bernard Goodman and John T. Duff, Jr., and by Adrian Block and [sador Setel, attorneys in Buffalo, New York, who performed legal services in that state for the Receivers.

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 180 Appellant was indicted in Houston County, Alabama, for second degree burglary. After several years delay caused by his imprisonment in the State of Georgia appellant filed a motion to dismiss the indictment on the ground that the State of Alabama had denied him his constitutional right to a speedy trial. He

McCabe, J. The appellees sued the appellant to set aside a deed of gift by his mother, conveying to him 160 acres of land, and for partition thereof. A trial of the issues resulted in a finding and judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, over defendant’s motion for a new trial. The only error assigned, and not waived by the appellant, calls in question the action of the court in overruling the motion for a' new t

When a party is entitled to inquire of another, and the position of that other is such as to require of him a response, which is the case here, the respondent is guilty of fraud if he make any material misrepresentation knowing it to be such, or if he conceal any material fact, which misrepresentation or concealment he should reasonably have anticipated would be, and in fact, was, relied upon by the inquirer to his hurt and to the profit or advantage of the respondent. And if the fraud be gro

In the fall of 1932 the appellee, C.E. Waggoner, wrote the appellant association a letter indicating his desire and purpose to apply for the total and permanent disability benefit provided in his insurance certificate in said association. Upon receipt of this letter the appellant forwarded the necessary blanks to enable the insured to make application for the disability benefits, with a letter stating that: "In order to receive this benefit the member must make satisfactory proof of di

THACKER, Circuit Judge: This appeal arises from the dismissal of three consumer actions based on Virginia state law claims. The actions focus on a series of misrepresentations made by Hyundai Motor America ("Hyundai") regarding the Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") estimated fuel economy for the 2011, 2012, and 2013 models of the Hyundai Elantra. A Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ("JPML") consolidated dozens of si

ACCEPTED 12-14-00220-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 9/4/2015 3:01:53 PM

Shankland, J. (delivering the' opinion of the Court of Appeals), says: “ Regarding as I do the cases of Stewart v. Lispenard, and Blanchard v. Nestle, as fixing the standard of testable capacity at any given point above that of the idiot and lunatic, the will cannot be declared void for the want of a sound disposing mind.” (Clarke v. Sawyer, 2 N. Y. [2 Comst.], 498.)