Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Jeffrey Cole, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The Mission Trust Investors, now the counter-defendants in this case, have filed a motion for leave to amend the pleadings by filing instanter their answer and affirmative defenses to the Mission Trustees’ counterclaim. [Dkt. # 195]. While that filing is late — it was due no later than December 30, 2014 — given the backdrop

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JEFFREY COLE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The Mission Parties have filed a motion for $17,720.60 in attorneys’ fees occasioned *831by their September 19, 2014 motion for sanctions. [Dkt. # 155]. The Plaintiffs do not agree that the amount is reasonable, and at best, might be willing to entertain a fee of h

(2008) David A. MARLEY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ELLIOT TURBOMACHINERY CO., INC., et al., Defendants. No. 07-23042-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida, Miami Division. March 13, 2008. AMENDED ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REMAND ADALBERTO JORDAN, District Judge. Elliott Turbomachinery and Viad removed this action to federal court pursuant

716 N.W.2d 394 (2006) Duane F. NELSON, et al., Appellants, v. SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON, INCORPORATED, Respondent, City of Stillwater, Respondent. No. A05-1740. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. June 27, 2006. *395 Jamie R. Pierce, Thomas G. Wallrich, Cyrenthia D. Jordan, Mansfield, Tanick & Cohen, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for

KELLY, Circuit Judge. Objector-Appellant Dale Hefner appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion for settlement-related discovery, approval of the settlement agreement, and order regarding attorneys’ fees. In re Sandridge Energy, Inc., No. CIV-13-102-W, 2015 WL 11899141 (W.D. Okla. Dec. 15, 2015); In re Sandridge Energy, Inc., No. CIV-13-10

[Cite as Elliot v. Moeller, 2014-Ohio-4136.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT ALLEN COUNTY MARCIA L. ELLIOT, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, CASE NO. 1-13-58 v. CHARLES L. MOELLER, ET AL., OPINION DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES. Appeal from Allen County Common Pleas Court

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge Motz wrote the opinion, in which Judge Traxler and Judge Keenan joined. DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit ' Judge: This' case arises from the fatal police shooting of Melvin Lawhorn. His personal representative, Arlean Brown, brought this action in state court, asserting Four

HAZOURI, J. In 2005, the Appellant, Gary R. Nikolits, Palm Beach County’s Property Appraiser, assessed as tangible personal property for purposes of ad valorem taxation computer software, i.e., “Wireless Services Software,” of the Appellee, Verizon Wireless Personal Communications, L.P. Verizon paid the tax under protest. Nikolits appeals the final judgment following a nonju-ry trial wherein the trial court found th

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2017-DR-00696-SCT STEPHEN ELLIOT POWERS v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ON MOTION FOR REHEARING DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/15/2000 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. RICHARD W. McKENZIE COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: FORREST COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR PETITIONER: OFFICE OF CAPITAL POST-CONVICTION

SIPA LIQUIDATION (Substantively Consolidated) MEMORANDUM DECISION AFFIRMING APPLICATION OF THE TRUSTEE’S INTER-ACCOUNT METHOD TO THE DETERMINATION OF TRANSFERS BETWEEN BLMIS ACCOUNTS STUART M. BERNSTEIN, United States Bankruptcy Judge: The motion before the Court (the “Motion ”) concerns the appropriate methodology for computing the “net equity” in a customer accou

OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM. Elliot K. Anderson, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals from the District Court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. We will summarily affirm. I. On April 8, 2011, while confined at the United States Penitentiary. (“USP”) Florence in Colorado, Anderson received an incident repor

05/21/2026 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE March 24, 2026 Session1 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ELLIOT ARNAZ PRICE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 122506 Hector Sanchez, Judge __________________

OPINION & ORDER RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge. Petitioner Gigi Jordan brings this Petition to enforce her rights under the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (“CVRA”), 18 U.S.C. § 3771, alleging that she is a victim of federal crimes perpetrated by her former husband. Respondents the Department of Justice (“DOJ”), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”), the United States Department of Health an

GE Oil & Gas, Inc. v Turbine Generation Servs., L.L.C. (2019 NY Slip Op 00405) GE Oil & Gas, Inc. v Turbine Generation Servs., L.L.C. 2019 NY Slip Op 00405 Decided on January 22, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department

MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, Circuit Judge. The prosecution and defense of criminal allegations produce ample opportunity for adversarial conflict. Without even looking for trouble, the interests of prosecution and defense can collide. This appeal demonstrates what can happen when one side steers those forces into direct and obvious conflict. Here, the prosecution’s desire to gather evid

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 9, 2020 Decided September 24, 2021 No. 19-5321 KLINT L. MOWRER & FRED WEAVER, JR., APPELLANTS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, ET AL., APPELLEES Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No

Matter of Jordan v White 2026 NY Slip Op 04305 July 8, 2026 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. In the Matter of Michael Edward Jordan, respondent, v Deleah White, appellant. (Proceeding No. 1) In the Matter of Deleah Whi

SHELLY D. DICK, CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the Court on the Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment by Plaintiff Kent & Smith Holdings, L.L.C. ("Plaintiff")1 and Defendant, HDI Global Insurance Company ("Defendant").2 Plaintiff and Defendant have filed Oppositions3 to each other's motions, and Defendant filed a

2020 WI 56 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2017AP2132 COMPLETE TITLE: In re the Paternity of B. J. M.: Timothy W. Miller, Joint-Petitioner-Appellant, v. Angela L. Carroll, Joint-Petitioner-Respondent-

2020 WI 56 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2017AP2132 COMPLETE TITLE: In re the Paternity of B. J. M.: Timothy W. Miller, Joint-Petitioner-Appellant, v. Angela L. Carroll, Joint-Petitioner-Respondent-