Cases

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STATE oF DELAWARE, ) § crim. 11) No. 1406020386 vi i Cr. A. N<»s. 1N 14-07-0530, ec¢. BERNARD ELLERBE, § Defendant. § Submitted: June 2, 2016 Decided: August 2, 2016 ORDER DENYING MOTION _I<"{§R POSTCONVICTION RELIEF This Z"d day of August, 20l6, upon consideration of the Defendant Bernard Ellerbe’s ("Ellerbe") Motion for Postconviction Relief (D.I. 48); the State’s Response thereto (D.I. 50); his trial counsel’s affidavit (D.I. 47); Ellerbe’s Re

Theodore G. Barlow, J. Four of the five children of the late Louis Arnold Williams, also known as Arnold Williams, also known as Arnold L. Williams, seek partition of certain real property owned by the decedent and described in the complaint. The defendant who is the fifth child of the decedent counterclaims for a judgment declaring her to be the sole owner of the premises. The decedent was 78 years old in 1968

ORDER LAUGHREY, District Judge. Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, or, Alternatively, for Summary Judgment with Respect to Count IX and Count X of the Complaint. Plaintiffs have filed their Suggestions in Opposition to which Defendants have filed a Reply. In consideration of these filings and for the reasons discussed below, the Court grants Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Count IX and

Wiiiteieed, O. J., delivered the opinion of the court. This case is not like that of Matthis {ante, 491) or Lester. In those cases the guilt of the parties was shown by overwhelming evidence of the most positive character.' This appellant was not present at the killing, and the effort here is to show that he was an accessory before the fact. Rut this rests wholly

[Cite as State v. Hunter, 2021-Ohio-2020.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) STATE OF OHIO C.A. No. 29790 Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE GEVONTE D. HUNTER

Paula Xinis, United States District Judge Pending before the Court is Plaintiff HABAKUK NDZERRE's motion to remand this action to the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, Maryland, ECF No. 18, and Defendant LIBERTY POWER CORP., LLC's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, ECF No. 17. The motion to remand is fully briefed, and the Court rules under Loc. R. 105.6 because a hearing is not necessary. For the reasons that follow

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ALEXANDER OTIS MATTHEWS, as Personal Representative for the Estate of Ezana Alexander Matthews, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 18-1190 (RDM) v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION The matter is before the Court on Defen

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1301 Doc: 53 Filed: 04/04/2025 Pg: 1 of 23 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-1301 JACOB DOE Plaintiff - Appellee v. THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SYSTEM; UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL; UN

685 F.Supp.2d 947 (2010) Kim AGULLARD, Plaintiff, v. PRINCIPAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY; WestEd Disability Plan Administrator; and WestEd, Defendants. No. CV-09-2065-PHX-NVW. United States District Court, D. Arizona. January 13, 2010. *950 Kevin Koelbel, Law Offices of Kevin Koelbel PC, Randolph G. Bachrach, Law Office of Randolph

Kern, Leila R., J. INTRODUCTION The defendant, Darnell Legette, has filed a motion to suppress the evidence that the police seized from his home and his vehicle on July 9, 2010. Based upon all the credible evidence and the reasonable inferences drawn therefrom, this court determines that Legette’s Motion to Suppress is DENIED. BACKGROUND The affidavit attached

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Angiolillo, J.), rendered February 21, 1997, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. The County Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion to vacate his plea of guilty (see, CPL 220.60 [3];

CHINYERE DURUANYIM, Plaintiff, v. ONYEMA R. DURUANYIM, Defendant. No. COA09-1260. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. Filed May 18, 2010. Billie R. Ellerbe, for plaintiff-appellee. Law Office of Richard B. Johnson, by Richard B. Johnson, for defendant-appellant. UNPUBLISHED OPINION ROBERT C. HUNTER, Judge. Defendant appeals from the trial court's Order

MEMORANDUM OPINION CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER, United States District Judge Plaintiff Manu Kennedy, a former District of Columbia firefighter, refused to comply with a policy requiring firefighters to be clean-shaven so that they can safely wear their respirators. Kennedy has pseudofolliculitis barbae (“PFB”), a skin condition

MEMORANDUM OPINION CLAUDE M. HILTON, District Judge. • THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendants’ Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency (“PHEAA”) and Vermont Student Assistance Corporation (“VSAC,” collectively “Defendants”) Motion for Summary Judgment. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania created PHEAA in 1963 for' the purpose of improving the higher education

By Judge David W. Lannetti Plaintiff Jane Doe (“Doe”), Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff Virginia Wesleyan College (“VWC”), and Third-Party Defendant Robert Roe (“Roe”) appeared before the Court on January 13, 2016, for a hearing (the “Hearing”) on various motions filed by the parties, proper notice having been given to all parties. At the conclusion of the Hearing, the Court took the following motions under ad

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BYRON BREEZE, JR., Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 21-753 (JDB) KABILA INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., is a broad and powerful statute aimed at providing a “clear and comprehens

336 F.Supp.2d 1141 (2004) COLORADO CROSS-DISABILITY COALITION, a Colorado Corporation, Jeremy Hudson, and James Hudson, Plaintiffs, v. COLORADO ROCKIES BASEBALL CLUB, LTD., a Colorado limited partnership, Defendant. Carrie Ann Lucas, for herself and as next friend of Heather Rebekah Lucas; Sherwood Owens, for himself and as next friend of Nicholas Owens; Kyle Stubbs; Roanne Kuenzler, and Evan Stutman, Plaintiffs, v. COLORADO ROCKIES B

739 F.Supp.2d 940 (2010) Wayne E. LEE, Plaintiff, v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 3: 10cv601. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. September 15, 2010. *941 Henry W. McLaughlin, III, The Law Office of Henry McLaughlin, P.C., Richmond, VA, for Plaintiff. Diana Margeaux Witherspoo

By Judge G. Carter Greer In this medical malpractice action, which has a tortuous procedural history, the plaintiff alleges in his first amended complaint that Dr. Jack Painter,1 an interventional cardiologist, negligently performed a cardiac catheterization by improperly utilizing a vascular closure device (“device”), with the result that the plaintiff suffered a complete occlusion of blood flow

MEMORANDUM OPINION James A. Wynn, Jr., United States Circuit Judge Circuit Judge James A. Wynn, Jr., wrote the opinion, in which District Judge Thomas D. Schroeder and District Judge Catherine C. Eagles joined: More than two decades ago, the Supreme Court considered a legal challenge to election districts that assigned voters to districts primarily on the basis of race. Shaw v. Reno (Shaw