⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Ellene T Davis”

Court of Appeals of Utah · 2018-04-26 · Published · cited 3× · 2018 UT App 71; 424 P.3d 1105
HARRIS, Judge: ¶1 A construction worker (Worker) employed by Air Systems, Inc. (Air Systems) crashed a company truck while commuting to work one morning, sustaining fatal injuries. His wife, Geneinne Ellen Davis (Davis), filed a claim for workers' compensation benefits. Subsequently, both an administrative law judge (ALJ) and the Utah Labor Commission (the Commiss
State v. Davispublic domain
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014-09-16 · Published · cited 0× · 442 S.W.3d 178; 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1030; 2014 WL 4548128
ORDER PER CURIAM: Jonathan Davis appeals his conviction of one count of second-degree burglary, § 569.170, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction. Having reviewed the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment of conviction. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons
State v. Davispublic domain
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016-12-07 · Published · cited 14× · 282 Or. App. 660; 385 P.3d 1253; 2016 Ore. App. LEXIS 1522
SHORR, J. Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for unlawful delivery of methamphetamine, ORS 475.890. He assigns error to the denial of his motion to suppress evidence that the police discovered following a traffic stop. Defendant raises three main arguments: First, defendant argues that the officer lacked reasonable suspicion to extend the traffic stop to investigate suspected drug activity; second, defendant argues tha
State v. Davispublic domain
Oregon Supreme Court · 2016-08-11 · Published · cited 10× · 360 Or. 201; 377 P.3d 583; 2016 Ore. LEXIS 527
LANDAU, J. The decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed. The judgment of the circuit court is reversed, and the case is remanded to the circuit court for further proceedings. *203 LANDAU, J. Two police officers approached defendant, suspecting that he ha
Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2019-05-29 · Published · cited 10× · 578 S.W.3d 329; 2019 Ark. App. 300
BART F. VIRDEN, Judge In this termination-of-parental-rights case, both parents, appellants Nathan Arnold and Jessica Davis, separately appeal the Crawford County Circuit Court's order terminating their parental rights to NA (04/10/09) and ZA (03/02/12). The parents challenge both the statutory grounds for termination and the circuit court's best-interest determination. We affirm. I. Relevant Facts
Montana Supreme Court · 2018-12-12 · Published · cited 2× · 435 P.3d 603; 2018 MT 306; 393 Mont. 446
Justice Laurie McKinnon delivered the Opinion of the Court. ***454¶ 1 The Montana Department of Revenue (the Department) appeals from an order of the Eleventh Judicial District Court, Flathead County, granting Kendra Espinoza, Jeri Ellen Anderson, and Jaime Schaefer (collectively, Plaintiffs) summary judgment. The Department is responsible fo
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2010-08-31 · Published · cited 0× · 325 S.W.3d 419; 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1157; 2010 WL 3398397
325 S.W.3d 419 (2010) James P. DAVIS, Quarry Holding Company and Community Title Company, Respondents/Cross-Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. PETERS, Appellant, and St. Charles Quarry, LLC, and Metro Fill Development, LLC, Defendants. No. ED 93128. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two. August 31, 2010. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Su
Oregon Supreme Court · 2018-08-16 · Published · cited 16× · 423 P.3d 706; 363 Or. 537
FLYNN, J. **539In this appeal from a decision of the Oregon Tax Court, taxpayer challenges the Tax Court's construction of the statutory formula by which Oregon calculates the portion of an interstate broadcaster's income that is taxable by Oregon. See ORS 314.680 to 314.690.1 Based in part on those statute
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont) · 2009-08-27 · Published · cited 5× · 295 S.W.3d 398; 2009 Tex. App. LEXIS 6713; 2009 WL 2616250
OPINION After an acquittal on the charge of indecency with a child, T.F.G., appellee, was granted an expunction by the trial court. In two issues, appellant, Texas Education Agency, ("TEA") appeals the trial court's expunction order. We reverse the trial court's order and remand the case for further proceedings. BACKGROUND T.F.G. was found not guilty of the charge of indecency with a child in a bench trial and subsequently fil
California Supreme Court · 2018-03-05 · Published · cited 2× · 229 Cal. Rptr. 3d 371; 4 Cal. 5th 467; 411 P.3d 548
CUÉLLAR, J. Like "cloud-capp'd towers," "gorgeous palaces," and perhaps someday even "the great globe itself," many arrangements endure for some time but eventually dissolve. 1 So too with certain law partnerships-including firms that are retained, before they dissolve, to handle matters on an hourly basis.
State v. Davispublic domain
Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997-09-16 · Published · cited 0× · 954 S.W.2d 6; 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1613; 1997 WL 570555
KAROHL, Judge. Defendant, Lewis T. Davis, argues he is entitled to a new trial because the trial court refused to instruct the jury on a lesser included offense of voluntary manslaughter where the defense was self-defense and his conduct may be found to be an act of sudden passion arising from adequate cause. The state charged Davis with murder second degree and armed criminal action. The court sentenced defendant in accord with
Davis v. Thompsonpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1998-06-10 · Published · cited 1× · 1998 Ore. App. LEXIS 930; 154 Or. App. 250; 961 P.2d 911
WARREN, P. J. Petitioner appeals the trial court’s dismissal of his petition for post-conviction relief. We write only to discuss his argument that his sentence as a dangerous offender is illegal because it violates the rule limiting the total sentence to 200 percent of the presumptive sentence for a single offense and 400 percent of the presumptive sentence of the primary offense for consecutive sentences. See ORS 13
Ex Parte Davispublic domain
Supreme Court of Alabama · 1998-09-04 · Published · cited 80× · 721 So. 2d 685; 1998 WL 560244
Leoneal Davis, as warden of the Draper Correctional Facility, and Charles Boutwell, as deputy warden of that facility, are defendants in an action pending in the Montgomery Circuit Court. They petition for a writ of mandamus directing that court to enter a summary judgment in their favor, based upon their defenses of absolute sovereign immunity and/or discretionary-function immunity. We grant their petition. I. Leola Pinkney, as administratrix of the estate of
West Virginia Supreme Court · 1999-12-03 · Published · cited 27× · 525 S.E.2d 315; 206 W. Va. 434; 1999 W. Va. LEXIS 167
525 S.E.2d 315 (1999) 206 W.Va. 434 In re MICHAEL RAY T., Scottie Lee T., and Tonya Lynn T. No. 26639. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted November 2, 1999. Decided December 3, 1999. *317 Harold B. Wolfe, III, Akers & Wolfe, Princeton, West Virginia, Attorney for the Appellant
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019-05-02 · Published · cited 45× · 923 F.3d 209
TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. 1 *212 The Commonwealth of Massachusetts brought suit on October 6, 2017, to enjoin the enforcement of two federal Interim Final Rules (together, the "IFRs") promulgated by the United States Departments
State v. Davispublic domain
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2024-12-26 · Published · cited 0× · 562 P.3d 279; 337 Or. App. 16
16 December 26, 2024 No. 922 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. THOMAS ALAN DAVIS, JR., Defendant-Appellant. Washington County Circuit Court C131383CR; A169891 On remand from the Oregon Supreme Court, State v. Davis, 372 Or 61
State v. Davispublic domain
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2024-03-13 · Published · cited 1× · 545 P.3d 1252; 331 Or. App. 487
No. 172 March 13, 2024 487 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. RYAN SCOTT DAVIS, Defendant-Appellant. Multnomah County Circuit Court 16CR44786; A176231 Eric L. Dahlin, Judge. Submitted March 17, 2023. Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Ap
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017-11-21 · Published · cited 10× · 808 S.E.2d 488; 256 N.C. App. 401
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA17-74 Filed: 21 November 2017 Forsyth County, Nos. 10-CVS-6926; 11-CVS-2998, 7119, 7120, 8170-8174, 8338; 12- CVS-4851, 4853-4859, 4861-4870, 4873-4876, 4916, 5953-5961, 5963, 6321, 6322, 6652, 7721, 8189; 13-CVS-1645, 4506, 6794, 7129; 14-CVS-4803-4806, 4808, 4809, 5702, 5703, 6311; 15-CVS-0301, 0610, 2471-2532, 3208-3231, 4011-4016, 4655-4657, 5447, 5448, 6744, 7770-777
Oregon Supreme Court · 2019-01-10 · Published · cited 8× · 432 P.3d 1080; 364 Or. 210
"(13) The department shall disclose personal information [in driver records] to a person who is in the business of disseminating such information under the following conditions: "(a) In addition to any other requirements under the contract executed pursuant to paragraph (b) of this subsection, the person requesting the information must file a performance bond with the department in the amount of $25,000. The bond
In re Davispublic domain
District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1990-01-26 · Published · cited 0× · 111 B.R. 234; 1990 Bankr. LEXIS 366; 1990 WL 16189
MEMORANDUM OPINION DAVID P. McDonald, Chief Judge. I. JURISDICTION This Court has jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter of this proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1334,151, and 157 and Local Rule 29 of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. This is a “core proceeding” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(L), which the Court may hear and determin