⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Ellen F. Bigham”

Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2023-07-17 · Published · cited 0× · 298 A.3d 343; 484 Md. 252
* IN THE ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND * SUPREME COURT * OF MARYLAND v. * AG Docket No. 80 ELLEN F. BIGHAM * September Term, 2
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997-09-17 · Published · cited 19× · 126 F.3d 95; 1998 A.M.C. 364; 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 24966; 1997 WL 572531
MESKILL, Circuit Judge: The issue is whether we have appellate jurisdiction to consider a district court’s decision vacating an earlier order compelling arbitration in London and ordering arbitration to proceed in New York. Augustea Impb Et Salvataggi (Augustea) appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Wood, J.,
Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1992-01-27 · Published · cited 5× · 602 A.2d 544; 1992 R.I. LEXIS 16; 1992 WL 16081
602 A.2d 544 (1992) FLEET NATIONAL BANK v. John D. MIGLIETTA et al. 91-42-Appeal. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. January 27, 1992. Barry Hittner, Richard M. Borod, Edwards & Angell, Providence, for plaintiff. Richard W. Zacks, Winograd & Shine, Ellen Benson, Winograd, Shine & Zacks, David Riedel, Andrew B. Prescott, Welling Thomas, Tillinghast, Co
Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1992-05-19 · Published · cited 0× · 614 A.2d 1218; 1992 R.I. LEXIS 122; 1992 WL 246278
[1] OPINION [2] This matter comes before the Supreme Court on a petition for clarification filed by the trustee, Fleet National Bank, following the issuance of our opinion in Fleet National Bank v.Miglietta, 602 A.2d 544 (R.I. 1992) (Miglietta I). In that case we were asked to answer a question submitted by the parties and certified by the Superior Court concerning the distribution of the principal of a spec
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1990-04-03 · Published · cited 0× · 195 Ga. App. 409; 393 S.E.2d 473; 1990 Ga. App. LEXIS 531
Deen, Presiding Judge. Appellant O’Neal was injured when she slipped on an “icy patch” on a concrete ramp providing egress from a grocery store operated by appellee Winn-Dixie Atlanta, Inc. (Winn-Dixie), and located in a shopping center owned by appellee Halpern Enterprises, Inc. (Halpern). She brought a negligence action against Winn-Dixie and Halpern, and on August 7, 1989, the trial court granted both defendants’ motions
Janelli v. Keeperpublic domain
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998-06-05 · Published · cited 5× · 721 A.2d 1036; 317 N.J. Super. 309
721 A.2d 1036 (1998) Louis A. JANELLI, Sr. and Ellen Janelli, Plaintiffs, v. Lester F. KEEPER, D.C., Defendant. Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division (Civil), Atlantic County. Decided June 5, 1998. *1037 Richard L. Press, Northfield, for plaintiffs (Preses & Long, attorneys). Charles C. Koernig, Pleasantville, for defendant (Paarz
Texas Supreme Court · 2005-02-11 · Published · cited 28× · 157 S.W.3d 434; 48 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 410; 2005 Tex. LEXIS 146
157 S.W.3d 434 (2005) In re U.S. SILICA CO. et al. In re Badger Mining Corp. In re Norton Co., et al. In re Norton Co. (n/k/a/ Saint Gordon Abrasives) Siebe North Inc. and Textron Inc. In re Bacou-Dalloz Safety, Inc. Nos. 04-0270, 04-0271, 04-0297, 04-0308, 04-0309. Supreme Court of Texas. February 11, 2005. Henry S. Platts, David E. Sharp, Beirne Maynard &a;
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000-08-01 · Published · cited 4× · 221 F.3d 279
SACK, Circuit Judge: This is an appeal and cross-appeal from a judgment entered by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Kimba M. Wood, Judge; Nicholas Tsoucalas, Judge, sitting by designation). The plaintiffs, Louis and Ibolya Ju-liano (the “Julianos”), brought this action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461, against Th
District Court, S.D. New York · 1991-04-12 · Published · cited 8× · 766 F. Supp. 104; 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4880; 1991 WL 102360
766 F.Supp. 104 (1991) BACCHUS ASSOCIATES, Plaintiff, v. HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY and A.B. Guari, Inc., Defendants. No. 89 Civ. 3834 (SWK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. April 12, 1991. *105 Karsch & Meyer, New York City (Gary Meyer, of counsel), for plaintiff Bacchus Associates. Bigham Englar Jon
State v. Barkerpublic domain
Supreme Court of Kansas · 1993-04-16 · Published · cited 62× · 850 P.2d 885; 252 Kan. 949; 1993 Kan. LEXIS 49
252 Kan. 949 (1993) 850 P.2d 885 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellant, v. MICHAEL BARKER, Appellee. No. 67,953 Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed April 16, 1993. Ellen H. Mitchell, assistant county attorney, argued the cause, and Thomas R. Stanton, assistant county attorney, Julie McKenna, county attorney, and Robert T. Step
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006-08-18 · Published · cited 3× · 904 A.2d 786; 387 N.J. Super. 487
904 A.2d 786 (2006) 387 N.J. Super. 487 STATE of New Jersey, DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, DIVISION OF INVESTMENT, by Treasurer John E. McCORMAC, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. QWEST COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC., Joseph P. Nacchio, Stephen M. Jacobsen, Drake S. Tempest, Marc B. Weisberg, James A. Smith, Afshin Mohebbi, Lewis O. Wilks, Craig D. Slater and Arthur Andersen, LLP, Defendants, and Robert S. Woodruff and Robin R. S
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006-08-18 · Published · cited 67× · 904 A.2d 775; 387 N.J. Super. 469
904 A.2d 775 (2006) 387 N.J. Super. 469 STATE of New Jersey, DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, DIVISION OF INVESTMENT, by Treasurer John E. McCORMAC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. QWEST COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC., Philip F. Anschutz; Joseph P. Nacchio; Robin R. Szeliga; Robert S. Woodruff; Stephen M. Jacobsen; Drake S. Tempest; Marc B. Weisberg; James A. Smith; Afshin Mohebbi; Lewis O. Wilks; Craig D. Slater, Defendants, and A
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000-08-01 · Published · cited 60× · 221 F.3d 279
221 F.3d 279 (2nd Cir. 2000) LOUIS G. JULIANO,*. Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee,v.THE HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATION OF NEW JERSEY, INC., dba U.S. HEALTHCARE, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant. Docket Nos. 98-9662(L), 99-7022(XAP)August Term, 1999 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSSECOND CIRCUIT Argued Nov.
District Court, S.D. New York · 1967-06-27 · Published · cited 7× · 280 F. Supp. 976; 1967 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9013
280 F.Supp. 976 (1967) TRINIDAD CORPORATION, as owner of the S. S. LYONS CREEK, Libellant, v. S. S. SISTER KATINGO and Nautilus Petroleum Carriers Corporation, Claimant-Petitioner, v. MORAN TOWING & TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, Inc., Respondent-Impleaded, TUG HELEN B. MORAN, TUG DIANA MORAN CORPORATION, Claimant-Impleaded, and TUG BARBARA MORAN, TUG HARRIET MORAN, INC., Claimant-Impleaded. No. 62 Ad. 1016.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979-06-15 · Published · cited 16× · 602 F.2d 474; 1979 A.M.C. 1654; 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 13927
WATERMAN, Circuit Judge: Cosmopolitan Shipping Co., Inc. (Cosmopolitan) appeals from a judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Cannella, J.) awarding Crown Central Petroleum Corp. (Crown Central), as owner of a cargo of Algerian blend crude oil, damages for a partial loss of cargo and a recovery for any contributions in general
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992-08-26 · Published · cited 101× · 974 F.2d 450; 24 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 14; 1992 A.M.C. 2705; 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 19812
OPINION DONALD RUSSELL, Circuit Judge: “When Erasmus mused that ‘[a] common shipwreck is a source of consolation to all’, Adagia, IV.iii.9 (1508), he quite likely did not foresee inconcinnate free-for-alls among self-styled salvors.” Martha’s Vineyard Scuba HQ, Inc. v. The Unidentified, Wrecked and Abandoned Steam Vessel, 833 F.2d 1059, 1061 (1st Cir.1987). Without doubt the Dutch schola
Missouri Court of Appeals · 1946-04-22 · Published · cited 2× · 194 S.W.2d 207; 239 Mo. App. 675; 1946 Mo. App. LEXIS 294
This is an action brought by Frank L. Welch, now deceased, doing business as Frank L. Welch Plumbing Company, for labor and material furnished the defendant, Kansas City, at various times during the years 1938 and 1939. The petition asked judgment in the sum of $6420.05. The case was tried before the court without the aid of a jury, resulting in a judgment in favor of the plaintiff below in the sum of $5682.18. Both parties have appealed. During the pendency of the appeal plaintiff die
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993-07-27 · Published · cited 244× · 2 F.3d 870
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge. A jury convicted appellants of federal civil rights crimes stemming from their actions as Oakland Housing Authority police officers. Their appeals raise a number of difficult questions, among them certain matters of first impression. We are required to decide what the government must prove to convict a law enforcement officer of depriving an individual of his federal constitutional right to be fre
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999-05-06 · Published · cited 98× · 258 A.D.2d 127; 689 N.Y.S.2d 100
OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. Section 468-a of the Judiciary Law requires every resident and nonresident attorney admitted to practice in the State of New York to file a biennial registration statement with the administrative office of the courts. A biennial registration fee must be paid at the time the statement is filed. This registration statement, which is mailed every two years by the Office of Co
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993-07-27 · Published · cited 121× · 2 F.3d 870; 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5642; 93 Daily Journal DAR 9617; 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 19035
2 F.3d 870 62 USLW 2119 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Juan Dale REESE, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Scott Matthew DWYER, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Daniel Wayne BROUSSARD, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Larry Marcel HOUSTON, Defendant-Appellant.