Cases

70 F.Supp.2d 758 (1999) Felipe ELIZONDO, Olivia Elizondo, Angel Elizondo, Marlen Elizondo, Nancy Elizondo, Karina Elizondo, Sarai Elizondo, Veronica Nino and Juan Nieto, Plaintiffs, v. Floyd Joseph PODGORNIAK and Ronald John Podgorniak, individually and d/b/a Podgorniak Farms, Defendants. No. 98-10235. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Northern Division. August 30, 1

JONES, Justice. Appellant Mildred Elizondo, “individually and on behalf of those she is authorized to represent,” sued the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (“Commission”), appellee, seeking judicial review of a decision by the Commission approving a Bureau of Reclamation project that would affect land owned by members of Elizondo’s family. The Commission filed a pl

974 S.W.2d 928 (1998) Mildred ELIZONDO, Appellant, v. TEXAS NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION COMMISSION, Appellee. No. 03-97-00620-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin. August 13, 1998. Rehearing Overruled September 17, 1998. *929 Jennifer S. Riggs, Riggs & Associates, P.C., Austin, for Appellant. Dan Mo

OPINION GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice. After Santos Martinez Salazar suffered injuries in a motor-vehicle accident, Salazar and his wife, Maria G. Martinez, Appellants, filed suit against Lesvia Azucena Ramos, Maverick County Insurance Agency, Inc. (Maverick Insurance), Elizondo Trucking, Eusebio Elizondo (Elizondo), Selicita Elizondo, and Cross-Pl

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

NUMBER 13-19-00127-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG UNITED SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE, Appellee. On appeal from the 206th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas. NUMBER 13-19-00128-CV

LEVY, J. *1140This case involves the intersection of two of the fundamental purposes of the Agricultural Labor Relations Act ( Labor Code, 1 § 1140 et seq.; the ALRA): one is the policy to provide agricultural workers with the right to choose in questions of labor representation through a secret ballot election process (§§ 1140.2, 1152, 115

Filed 5/30/18 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT GERAWAN FARMING, INC., F073720 Petitioner, (42 ALRB No. 1) v. OPINION AGRICULTURAL LA

MEMORANDUM AND OPINION LEE H. ROSENTHAL, District Judge. The plaintiffs in this case are reinsurance companies (the “Reinsurers”)1 seeking to compel arbitration of certain disputes relating to, or to obtain a declaratory judgment establishing, the rights and liabilities arising from reinsurance certificates. The defendants are Huntsman Corporation (“Huntsman”), the insured, an

Case: 13-50411 Document: 00512697267 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/14/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 13-50411 July 14, 2014

NUMBER 13-05-0024-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS </

(2008) Escolastico DE LEON-GRANADOS, Isais Profeta de Leon-Granados, and Armenio Pablo-Calmo on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. ELLER & SONS TREES, INC. and Jerry Eller, Defendants. No. 1:05-CV-1473-CC. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. October 7, 2008. OPINION AND ORDER C

927 S.W.2d 103 (1996) HYCARBEX, INC.; Moin Hussain and S.K. Bhattacharjee, Individually, Appellants, v. ANGLO-SUISSE, INC. and Anglo-Suisse (Pakistan), Appellees. No. 14-94-00728-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.). June 6, 1996. *106 N.J. `Jim' Farrell, David F. Beale, Houston, for appellants. Joe M. Kirkh

ACCEPTED 13-13-00549-CV THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 1/6/2015 11:12:49 AM

752 P.2d 55 (1988) ORSINGER OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS OF the STATE OF COLORADO, Robert Clevenger, the Department of Administration of the State of Colorado, and Thomas R. Moeller, Defendants-Appellees. No. 86SA215. Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc. February 22, 1988. *58 Holme

Opinion issued March 10, 2011 In The Court of Appeals For The<

ORDER XAVIER RODRIGUEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On this date, the Court considered Plaintiff David W. Standley’s Motion for Summary Judgment (docket no. 42), Defendant Michael S. Rogers’s Motion for Summary Judgment (docket no. 41), and the corresponding responses and replies. After careful consideration, the Court will grant Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment and deny Plaintiffs Motion for Summ

EVELYN V. KEYES, Justice, dissenting from denial of en banc reconsideration. I respectfully dissent from the denial of en banc reconsideration in this case. The panel finds the evidence legally insufficient to support the trial court’s order granting sole managing conservatorship of a thriving six-year-old child to the foster parents, appellees Bryan Danet and Todd Kranz. Danet and Kranz have raised J.A.B. since

Office of the Director New Mexico Compilation 2022.08.19 Commission '00'06- 15:07:22 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: 2021-NMCA-043 Filing Date: June

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MIGUEL ANGEL REYNAGA No. 19-35513 HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:18-cv-00040- v. SPW DERREK SKINNER, in his individual capacity, Defendant-Appellant, and PEDRO HERNANDEZ, in his individual capacity, Defendant. 2 R