Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Elizabeth Williams v. Countrywide Financial Corporation”
VCS, Inc. v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.public domain
Chief Justice DURRANT, opinion of the Court: Introduction 1 1 Appellant VCS, Inc. provided labor and materials to improve real property located in the Acord Meadows planned unit development in Salt Lake City. The developer, Acord Meadows, LLC (Acord), secured funding for the project from two lenders-America West Bank (America West) and Utah
Erbey Holding Corporation John R. Erbey Family Limited Partnership v. Blackrock Financial Management, Inc.public domain
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX ERBEY HOLDING CORPORATION; JOHN R. CASE NO. SX-2018-CV-00146 ERBEY FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, BY ITS GENERAL PARTNER JUPITER CAPITAL INC.; SALT Complex Litigation Division POND HOLDINGS, LLC; MUNUS, L.P.; CARISMA TRUST, BY ITS TRUSTEE VENIA, LLC; TRIBUE Action for Damages LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; AND ALTISOURCE ASSET MANAGEMENT CORPORATION,
Erbey Holding Corporation John R. Erbey Family Limited Partnership v. Blackrock Financial Management, Inc.public domain
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX ERBEY HOLDING CORPORATION; JOHN R. CASE NO. SX-2018-CV-00146 ERBEY FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, BY ITS GENERAL PARTNER JUPITER CAPITAL INC.; SALT Complex Litigation Division POND HOLDINGS, LLC; MUNUS, L.P.; CARISMA TRUST, BY ITS TRUSTEE VENIA, LLC; TRIBUE Action for Damages LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; AND ALTISOURCE ASSET MANAGEMENT CORPORATION,
King v. First Capital Financial Services Corp.public domain
828 N.E.2d 1155 (2005) 215 Ill.2d 1 293 Ill.Dec. 657 Willard J. KING, Jr., et al., Appellants, v. FIRST CAPITAL FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION, d/b/a FCF Funding, Appellee. Ricky Jenkins et al., Appellants, v. Concorde Acceptance Corporation et al., Appellees. Nos. 97263, 97761. Supreme Court of Illinois. April 21, 200
MEMORANDUM OPINION M. HANNAH LAUCK, District Judge. In its Complaint originally filed in the Circuit Court for the City of Richmond, the Commonwealth of Virginia, on behalf of the, Virginia Retirement System (“VRS”), alleges that defendants made fraudulent misrepresentations in offerings of mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”), also called certificates, or residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”),
In re: Elizabeth Collins v.public domain
ELECTRONIC CITATION: 2011 FED App. 0010P (6th Cir.) File Name: 11b0010p.06 BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL OF THE SIXTH CIRCUIT In re: ELIZABETH R. COLLINS, ) ) Debtor. ) ) No. 10-8085 ) _____________________________________ ) )
PHH Corp. v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureaupublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued April 12, 2016 Decided October 11, 2016 No. 15-1177 PHH CORPORATION, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, RESPONDENT On Petition for Review of an Order of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB File 2014-CFPB-0002)
McANANEY v. ASTORIA FINANCIAL CORP.public domain
665 F.Supp.2d 132 (2009) David McANANEY, Carolyn McAnaney, John Reilly, Constance Reilly, Philip Russo, Cynthia Russo, and Geoffrey Horn, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. ASTORIA FINANCIAL CORP., Astoria Federal Savings Loan Assoc., Astoria Federal Mortgage Corp., Long Island Bancorp, Inc., and Long Island Savings Bank, FSB, Defendants. No. 04-CV-1101 (JFB)(WDW).
McAnaney v. Astoria Financial Corp.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOSEPH F. BIANCO, District Judge: Plaintiffs brought this class action against defendants Astoria Financial Corporation (hereinafter, “Astoria Financial”), Astoria Federal Savings and Loan Association (hereinafter, “Astoria Federal”), Astoria Federal Mortgage Corporation (hereinafter, “Astoria Mortgage”), Long Island Bancorp, Inc. (hereinafter “LIB”), and Long Island Savings Bank, FSB (her
PHH Corporation v. CFPBpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued April 12, 2016 Decided October 11, 2016 No. 15-1177 PHH CORPORATION, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, RESPONDENT On Petition for Review of an Order of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB File 2014-CFPB-0002)
248 B.R. 60 (2000) In re FIRSTPLUS FINANCIAL, INC., Debtor. Charles Kahler et al., Plaintiffs, v. FIRSTPLUS Financial, Inc., Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 99-318969-HCA-11. Adversary No. 99-3388. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. April 26, 2000. *61 *62
OPINION ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge The United States and numerous states sued Wells Fargo & Company and Wells Fargo Bank N.A. (collectively, Wells Fargo), as well as other major mortgagee banks, alleging misconduct in their home mortgage practices. All parties agreed to a national settlement, resulting in multiple consent judgments.
OPINION REGARDING MOTION TO INTERVENE ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge Alleging misconduct in home mortgage practices, the United States and numerous *117 State attorneys general sued major mortgagees including Citigroup, Ine.; Citibank, N.A.; and CitiMortgage,
OPINION ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge. The United States and numerous state attorneys general sued Wells Fargo & Company and Wells Fargo Bank N.A. (collectively, Wells Fargo), and other major mortgagees, alleging misconduct in their home mortgage practices. All parties agreed to a settlement, resulting in multiple consent judgments. In its consent ju
City of Miami v. Wells Fargo & Co.public domain
MARCUS, Circuit Judge: *1263 This pair of ambitious fair housing lawsuits brought by the City of Miami against major financial institutions returns to our Court after having been appealed to the Supreme Court and resolved there in Bank of America Corp. v. City of Miami
SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge. Mayme Brown, the Hot Spring County, Arkansas Circuit Clerk, filed suit in Arkansas state court against the appellees, various originators and servicers of loans (Lenders).. Brown alleged that the Lenders used the Mortgage Electronic • Registration System (MERS) to avoid paying recording fees on mortgage assignments and, thus, deprived Arkansas counties of
448 B.R. 517 (2011) FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF CHICAGO, Plaintiff, v. BANC OF AMERICA SECURITIES LLC, et al., Defendants. No. 10-CV-09105 MRP (MANx). United States District Court, C.D. California. March 15, 2011. *519 Lynn Lincoln Sarko, Derek W. Loeser, Amy Williams-Derry, Elizabeth A. Leland, Seattle, WA, Gary A. Gotto, Keller R
Goodwin v. Executive Trustee Services, LLCpublic domain
680 F.Supp.2d 1244 (2010) Aleta Rose GOODWIN, Robert Paul McArtor, and Heather Gabel, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals; Joseph Jones, Meisa Jones, Michael R. Tierney and Fredrick Tulip, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals; Linda R. Barba; Cynthia and Charles Flagg; Janice Gannon; William Dan Kluttz; Brian E. Jones; James H. Mullennix and Jeanne K. Mullenix; Heather Monahan and Geo
Jenkins v. Concorde Acceptance Corp.public domain
PRESIDING JUSTICE CAMPBELL delivered the opinion of the court: In these 37 consolidated appeals, plaintiffs appeal from orders of the circuit court of Cook County dismissing their complaints against the defendant financial institutions, from which plaintiffs had obtained mortgages. The complaints alleged that the defendants
Willis v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS WILLIAM B. SHUBB, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff Elizabeth A. Willis brought this action against JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”) for violation of the California Homeowner’s Bill of Rights (“HBOR”) and negligence arising out defendant’s alleged mishandling of plaintiffs loan modification requests. The matter is now before the court on defendant’s Motion t