⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Elizabeth L. Egan”

District Court, E.D. Texas · 2011-09-30 · Published · cited 4× · 822 F. Supp. 2d 657; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112566; 2011 WL 4591922
822 F.Supp.2d 657 (2011) BLUESTONE INNOVATIONS TEXAS, L.L.C., Plaintiff. v. FORMOSA EPITAXY INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 2:10-cv-171-TJW-CE. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Marshall Division. September 30, 2011. *659 Jonathan Brackett Crocker, Holland & Knight LLP, Baldine B. Paul, Kim E. Choate, Sunwo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019-09-19 · Published · cited 0× · 2019 NY Slip Op 6667
Matter of Elizabeth TT. (Suzanne YY.--Elizabeth ZZ.) (2019 NY Slip Op 06667) Matter of Elizabeth TT. (Suzanne YY.--Elizabeth ZZ.) 2019 NY Slip Op 06667 Decided on September 19, 2019 Appellate Division, Third Department
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021-02-25 · Published · cited 0× · 191 A.D.3d 1194; 142 N.Y.S.3d 643; 2021 NY Slip Op 01167
Matter of Bradley Q. (Elizabeth R.) (2021 NY Slip Op 01167) Matter of Bradley Q. (Elizabeth R.) 2021 NY Slip Op 01167 Decided on February 25, 2021 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Rep
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2012-07-10 · Published · cited 0× · 136 Conn. App. 643; 47 A.3d 402; 2012 WL 2546806; 2012 Conn. App. LEXIS 330
Opinion WEST, J. The defendants, the planning board of the city of Stamford and subdivision applicant Michael Innaurato,1 appeal from the judgment of the trial court sustaining the aggrieved plaintiffs’ appeal2 from the *646planning board’s approval of Innaurato’s subdivision applicat
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017-03-21 · Published · cited 74× · 851 F.3d 263; 102 Fed. R. Serv. 1264; 27 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 341; 2017 WL 1055568; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 4993; 101 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,763
JORDAN, Circuit Judge, concurring in the judgment. In our ruling today, we are required to defer to the Department of Labor’s interpretation of the FMLA. While I concur in the judgment, I write separately to note my discomfort with our reasoning, which is dictated by the regimes of deference adopted by the Supreme Court in Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 83
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020-05-14 · Published · cited 0× · 123 N.Y.S.3d 294; 183 A.D.3d 1027; 2020 NY Slip Op 2829
Matter of Arra L. (Christine L.) (2020 NY Slip Op 02829) Matter of Arra L. (Christine L.) 2020 NY Slip Op 02829 Decided on May 14, 2020 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bure
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018-03-01 · Published · cited 0× · 2018 NY Slip Op 1362
Matter of Joseph H. v Elizabeth I. (2018 NY Slip Op 01362) Matter of Joseph H. v Elizabeth I. 2018 NY Slip Op 01362 Decided on March 1, 2018 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting
Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2025-10-07 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges O’Brien, Ortiz and Friedman PUBLISHED Argued at Fredericksburg, Virginia RESTON ANESTHESIA ASSOCIATES, P.C., ET AL. OPINION BY v. Record No. 1792-23-4 JUDGE FRANK K. FRIEDMAN
Thomas v. Eganpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001-01-10 · Published · cited 34× · 1 F. App'x 52
SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the decision of the said District Court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED. Elizabeth Thomas, pro se and incarcerated, appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Preska, J.) entered on March 27, 2000, granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing he
Supreme Court of Missouri · 2008-02-05 · Published · cited 10× · 244 S.W.3d 169; 2008 Mo. LEXIS 10; 2008 WL 307689
244 S.W.3d 169 (2008) Robert C. EGAN M.D., Appellant, v. ST. ANTHONY'S MEDICAL CENTER, Respondent. No. SC 88493. Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc. February 5, 2008. Alan G. Kimbrell, Ballwin, MO, for Appellant. Neal F. Perryman, Jennifer E. Behm, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent. David M. Harris, Andrew Walkup, St. Louis, Gerald. M. Sill, Anne C. Curchi
District Court, S.D. Texas · 2018-06-14 · Published · cited 2× · 586 B.R. 837
SIM LAKE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *839This Memorandum Opinion and Order addresses an appeal brought by Houston Bluebonnet, L.L.C. ("Houston Bluebonnet," "Appellant," or "Debtor") from the Order Granting Movants' Motion for Approval and Determining Their Informal Proofs of Claim Lack Prima Facie Validity, signed
District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2002-12-30 · Published · cited 20× · 237 F. Supp. 2d 774; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24986; 90 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1199; 2002 WL 31898049
237 F.Supp.2d 774 (2002) Marti EGAN Plaintiff v. PREMIER SCALES & SYSTEMS, d/b/a SOUTHERN INDIANA SCALE COMPANY, INC. Defendant No. CIV.A. 302CV524H. United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky, at Louisville. December 30, 2002. *775 Samuel G. Hayward, Adams, Hayward, Nicolas & Welsh, Louisville, KY, for Plaintiff.
State v. Musalfpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016-08-03 · Published · cited 2× · 280 Or. App. 142; 380 P.3d 1087; 2016 Ore. App. LEXIS 968
WILSON, S. J. Defendant appeals a judgment convicting him of unlawful possession of a Schedule I controlled substance, ORS 475.752(3)(b). He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence. Specifically, defendant contends that the warrantless search of the inside of his pocket, which yielded a plastic container holding the drugs, was neither consensual nor justified by the officer safety exception
Lange v. Langepublic domain
New York Supreme Court · 2001-02-27 · Published · cited 0× · 187 Misc. 2d 416; 723 N.Y.S.2d 335; 2001 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 63
OPINION OF THE COURT David D. Egan, J. This is a case of first impression. The parties seek a judgment of divorce and have settled all outstanding issues, including the distribution of their marital assets and debts, with one exception. On April 5, 1999, more than a year before the *417plaintiff Wife (hereinafter Wife) filed for divorce, the partie
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013-11-12 · Published · cited 0× · 128 So. 3d 160; 2013 WL 5988613; 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 17970
PADOVANO, J. This is an appeal by the Florida State Fire Service Association, IAFF Local S-20, from a final order by the Florida Public Employee Relations Commission dismissing an unfair labor practice charge. The *162charge was based on a claim that the state had violated the association’s right to collective bargaining by failing to negotiate a condition in the agre
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010-09-03 · Published · cited 16× · 620 F.3d 76; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 18432; 2010 WL 3447884
620 F.3d 76 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Mitchell R. EPSTEIN, Defendant-Appellant, *77 Mandie Jo Willis, Diana L. Willis, Defendants.[*] Docket No. 09-4025-cr. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Submitted: August 27, 2010. Decided: September 3, 2010. Melissa A. Tuohey
Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2026-06-16 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2024-CA-01158-COA DIANE L. MERRITT APPELLANT v. KENNETH MERRITT APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/13/2024 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. D. NEIL HARRIS SR. COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: GREENE COUNTY CHANCERY COURT ATTORNEY FO
State v. Smithpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013-10-16 · Published · cited 2× · 2013 WL 5634173; 2013 Ore. App. LEXIS 1242; 259 Or. App. 36; 312 P.3d 552
NAKAMOTO, J. Defendant appeals his conviction for interference with making a report, ORS 165.572. Under that statute, as relevant here, “[a] person commits the crime of interference with making a report if the person, by removing, damaging or interfering with a * * * telephone * * *, intentionally prevents or hinders another person from making a report to a * * * 9-1-1 emergency reporting system.” Defendant assigns error to the
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015-02-06 · Published · cited 88× · 778 F.3d 228; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 1944; 2015 WL 500748
LYNCH, Chief Judge. Not all claims of wrongdoing by a company make out a viable claim that the company has committed securities fraud. This case is an example. Institutional investors, asserting claims on behalf of a putative class of purchasers of the stock of defendant Abiomed, Inc., 1 brought
Succession of Eganpublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1989-04-12 · Published · cited 2× · 543 So. 2d 940; 1989 WL 36904
543 So.2d 940 (1989) SUCCESSION OF Earl Ernest EGAN, Jr. No. 88-CA-683. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit. April 12, 1989. Steven E. Hayes and William C. Harrison, Jr., Metairie, for plaintiff/appellant. Bernard M. Plaia, Jr., Metairie, for defendant/appellee. Before GRISBAUM, WICKER and GOTHARD, JJ. WICKER, Judge. Ilsa Tatum Egan, a su