Cases

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE February 9, 2016 Session ELIZABETH ANN MORROW GRANOFF v. ANDREW SCOTT GRANOFF Appeal from the Circuit Court for Jefferson County No. 19472-II Hon. Richard Vance, Judge No. E2015-00605-COA-R3-CV-FILED-MARCH 16, 2016 This second appeal of this post-divorce case concerns the husband‟s continued occupation of the marital re

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE June 18, 2014 Session ELIZABETH ANN MORROW GRANOFF v. ANDREW SCOTT GRANOFF Appeal from the Circuit Court for Jefferson County No. 19,472 Richard R. Vance, Judge No. E2013-02598-COA-R3-CV-FILED-SEPTEMBER 26, 2014 This action arose over the proposed post-divorce sale of improved real property in which both par

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE December 6, 2011 Session ELIZABETH ANN (STICKNEY) COMPTON v. NEIL SCOTT STICKNEY Appeal from the Circuit Court for Montgomery County No. 50300776 John H. Gasaway, III, Judge No. M2011-01520-COA-R3-CV - Filed January 11, 2012 This is a post-divorce dispute over father’s obligation to help pay for the parties’ c

MANSFIELD, Justice. We have been asked to answer two certified questions of Iowa law in an employment discrimination case filed in federal district court. They are: 1. Do Iowa Code section 216.6A, Iowa’s equal pay law, and the accompanying remedial language in section 216.15(9)(a)(9), apply to permit a plaintiff to pursue wage discrimination cla

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-19-00509-CR Elizabeth Ann MARTINEZ, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas,

NORMAN K. MOON, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This is an Eighth Amendment class action concerning the long-term failure to provide adequate medical care to inmates at the Fluvanna (Va.) Correctional Center for Women (FCCW). FCCW is Virginia's primary women's medical prison. The present defendants are officials employed by the Virginia Department of Corrections (VDOC).1 After years

NORMAN K. MOON, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs' Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) (dkt. 554) and Defendants' Motion Pursuant to Rule 59(e) (dkt. 556). Both motions request alteration or amendment of the Court's January 2, 2019 Injunction (dkt. 545). For the reasons stated below, the Court will grant in part and deny in part each motion.

EDITH BROWN CLEMENT, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff Gene Barry is a physician licensed to practice medicine in Texas, who works part-time at the Red Bluff Clinic in Pasadena. 1 Defendants Scott Freshour, Belinda West, Mari Robinson, Anne Rauch, Mary Chapman, and Debbi Henneke are all employees of the Texas Medical Board ("TMB") servi

ALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS July 11, 2025 CR-2025-0195 Debra Ann Elizabeth Bishop v. State of Alabama (Appeal from Montgomery Circuit Court: CC-22-1283) NOTICE You are hereby notified that on July 11, 2025, the following action was taken in the above-referenced cause by the Court of Criminal Appeals: Application for Rehearing Overruled. D. Scott Mitche

Keasler, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. A defendant has a constitutional right to have her fate determined "before the first trier of fact." 1 A trial judge may violate this right by ordering a mistrial over her objection; but if she consented to it, double jeopardy will not prevent her re-prosecution.

MEMORANDUM OPINION NORMAN K. MOON, District Judge. Plaintiffs, all prisoners residing at Flu-vanna Correctional Center for Women (“FCCW”), a facility of the Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Corrections (the “VDOC”), filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that Defendants violated Plaintiffs’ constitutional rights under the Eighth Amendment to be free from cruel and unusual puni

MEMORANDUM OPINION NORMAN K. MOON, District Judge. Plaintiffs, all prisoners residing at Flu-vanna Correctional Center for Women (“FCCW”), a facility of the Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Corrections (the ‘VDOC”), filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that Defendants1 violated Plaintiffs’ constitutional rights under the Eighth Amendment to

OWEN, Circuit Judge: In a prior opinion and order, we certified a question to the Supreme Court of Louisiana pertaining to the bona fide termination prong of the Lemoines’ malicious prosecution claim. 1 In light of the explication of Louisiana law in the Louisiana Supreme Court’s decision, we conclude that the Lemoines

W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge, dissenting: I respectfully dissent. In Friedman v. Boucher, 580 F.3d 847 (9th Cir.2009), we held that the taking of a DNA sample without a warrant, and without suspicion of a crime that the DNA sample would help solve, violated the plaintiffs clearly established Fourth Amendment rights. Proposition 69 requires that DNA samples be taken from all felony

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE VETON VEJSELI, BRETT PERRY, and ) CHRISTOPHER VILLINGER, on ) behalf of themselves and all similarly ) situated stockholders of Ionic Digital, ) Inc., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2025-0232-BWD

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE VETON VEJSELI, BRETT PERRY, and ) CHRISTOPHER VILLINGER, on ) behalf of themselves and all similarly ) situated stockholders of Ionic Digital, ) Inc., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2025-0232-BWD

ACCEPTED 07-15-00284-CV SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS AMARILLO, TEXAS 12/17/2015 1:23:16 PM Vivian Long, Clerk

NO. 12-12-00427-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS ELIZABETH BIRDOW SCOTT, § APPEAL FROM THE 7TH APPELLANT V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE § SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

POSNER, Circuit Judge. Indiana and Wisconsin are among the shrinking majority of states that do not recognize the validity of same-sex marriages, whether contracted in these states or in states (or foreign countries) where they are lawful. The states have appealed from district court decisions invalidating the states’ laws that ordain such refusal.

OPINION Opinion by Justice FITZGERALD. Appellant Roland Scott Arnell 1 appeals the trial court’s Order on Petition for Registration and Enforcement of Support Orders and Order for Turnover in favor of his former wife, Monika Elizabeth Arnell. In the proceedings below, Monika