Cases

DICKINSON, PRESIDING JUSTICE, DISSENTING: ¶25. When Mississippi established its current Constitution in 1890, it granted to the courts of chancery not only the-jurisdiction over matters controlled by principles of equity, but also jurisdiction over several areas controlled by law, including “[djivorce and alimony,” and “minor’s business.”5 Since its origin in England in 1576,

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 20-CM-52 LAFFETTE COPELAND, APPELLANT, V. UNITED STATES, APPELLEE.

AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed November 29, 2018. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-00925-CV WILLIE COPELAND, Appellant V. EUGENE WALKER, JR. AND ELSA NIEVES BROWN, Appellees1

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT ASHLEY ANN KRAPACS, Appellant, v. NISHA E. BACCHUS, Appellee. No. 4D19-641 [August 12, 2020] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Stefanie

226 S.W.3d 287 (2007) STATE of Tennessee v. Arthur T. COPELAND. Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Knoxville. January 3, 2007 Session. May 23, 2007. *289 Robert E. Cooper, Attorney General and Reporter; Michael E. Moore, Solicitor General; Alice B. Lustre, Assistant Attorney General; Michael L. Flynn, District Attorney General; and K

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan September 22, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 131996-7

80 S.W.3d 297 (2002) Elizabeth FITZPATRICK, Appellant, v. David Weldon COPELAND; David Copeland Sand & Gravel, Inc.; and Southwest International Trucks, Inc., Appellees. No. 2-01-112-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth. June 27, 2002. *298 David Broiles, Fort Worth, for Appellant. Michael Peck of Fort Worth, Lela

McKEAGUE, Circuit Judge. This appeal is the latest installment in an ERISA litigation saga that has spanned almost ten years. At the risk of oversimplifying their case, the Plaintiff-Retirees claim that Defendant Norton Healthcare, Inc. Retirement Plan ("Norton") underpaid them under the terms of the plan. The district court found that the plan was unambiguous in the Retirees' favor. We

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Petty, O’Brien and Senior Judge Frank Argued by teleconference PUBLISHED JOHN BERRY OPINION BY v. Record No. 0204-20-4 JUDGE WILLIAM G. PETTY JULY 14, 2020

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________ No. 06-05-00113-CR ___________________

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2020-IA-00339-SCT ESTATE OF MICHAEL N. BAKARICH, AND CO- EXECUTRICES, VICTORIA LYNN RAY, STEPHANIE BAKARICH JESELNIK AND ALEXANDRA ELIZABETH OWENS v. JOHN FREDERICK BAKARICH DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/06/2020 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. VICKI R. BARNES TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: REBECCA SUZANNE BLUNDEN

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE March 22, 2005 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ARTHUR T. COPELAND Circuit Court for Blount County No. C-11100 D. Kelly Thomas, Jr. No. E2002-01123-CCA-R3-DD - Filed August 22, 2005 The defendant, Arthur T. Copeland, was convicted by a Blount County jury of one count of

OPINION MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge. The seven plaintiffs (Louis Henderson, Dana Harley, Dwight Smith, Albert Knox, James Douglas, Alqadeer Hamlet, and Jeffery Beyer) bring this lawsuit on behalf of themselves and a class of all current and future HIV-positive prisoners incarcerated in Alabama Department of Corrections (ADOC) facilities. They challenge the ADOC’s policy of categorically s

OPINION AND ORDER MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge. The plaintiffs are eight HIV+ inmates who challenge the policy of the Alabama Department of Corrections of segregating HIV + inmates from the general prison population. The plaintiffs claim that the defendants (the ADOC Commissioner and four wardens) have discriminated against them on the basis of a disability (HIV-1- status) in violation of Title

322 S.E.2d 389 (1984) 312 N.C. 304 STATE of North Carolina v. Johnny FOWLER. No. 152A84. Supreme Court of North Carolina. November 6, 1984. *390 Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Asst. Atty. Gen. Elizabeth C. Bunting, Raleigh, for the State. Appellate Defender Adam Stein by Asst. Appellant Defender An

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2001-CA-00334-SCT UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY COMPANY v. ELIZABETH KNIGHT DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/05/2000 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. ALBERT B. SMITH, III COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: COAHOMA COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: LUTHER T. MUNFORD

337 F.Supp.2d 825 (2004) George DALE, et al. Plaintiffs v. Emilio COLAGIOVANNI, et al. Defendants No. CIV.A.3:01 CV 663BN. United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Jackson Division. September 22, 2004. *826 Charles Greg Copeland, Robert C. Richardson, Janet G. Arnold, Copeland, Cook, Taylor & Bush, Ridgeland, MS, Alan

435 F.Supp. 513 (1977) Francis X. McLAUGHLIN v. Lammot duPont COPELAND, Jr. and Lammot duPont Copeland, Sr. and E. Norman Veasey. Civ. No. B-76-475. United States District Court, D. Maryland. June 7, 1977. *514 *515 *516 *517</

OPINION AND ORDER MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge. The eight named plaintiffs (Louis Henderson, Dana Harley, Darrell Robinson, Dwight Smith, Albert Knox, James Douglas, Alqadeer Hamlet, and Jeffery Beyer) bring this lawsuit on behalf of themselves and a class of all current and future HIV + prisoners incarcerated in Alabama Department of Corrections (ADOC) facilities. They challenge ADOC’s

GORSUCH, Circuit Judge. This case has but little to do with bankruptcy. Neither the debtor nor the creditors, not even the bankruptcy trustee, are parties to it. True, the plaintiffs claim they once enjoyed an attorney-client relationship with a former bankruptcy trustee. True, they now allege the former trustee breached professional duties due them because of conflicting obli