⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Elion v. Auto USA”

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016-12-28 · Published · cited 8× · 158 A.3d 88; 2016 Pa. Super. 305; 2016 Pa. Super. LEXIS 804
OPINION BY GANTMAN, P.J.: Appellant, Kevin A. Rohe, appeals from the judgment entered in the Bradford County Court of Common Pleas, in favor of Appellees, Darris D. Vinson and Fenton Welding Transport, LLC, in this negligence action. We reverse and remand for a new trial. The relevant facts and procedural history of this case
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2018-09-21 · Published · cited 0× · 342 F. Supp. 3d 582
I. BACKGROUND On April 30, 2016, Ms. Smerdon was shopping at Wal-Mart in Mansfield, Tioga County, Pennsylvania when a robber demanded cash from a customer service employee.1 Ms. Smerdon and several others chased the robber out to the parking lot.2 The robber ran toward his car which he had left running.3 Surveillance foota
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014-04-28 · Published · cited 1× · 18 F. Supp. 3d 604; 2014 WL 1672261; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58266
MEMORANDUM MALACHY E. MANNION, District Judge. A fire, theft, and loss of millions of dollars of memorabilia, maps, documents, cash, rare coins, and artwork by the likes of Picasso and Rembrandt are the subject matter of this case. These valuable items were all allegedly owned and maintained by Timothy Kump in his private home. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company covered his residence and these
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2012-07-12 · Published · cited 0× · 877 F. Supp. 2d 228; 2012 WL 2913714; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99280
MEMORANDUM & ORDER JOHN E. JONES III, District Judge. Presently pending before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Statutory *229Bad Faith and UTPCPL Claims Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) (Doc. 65) of Defendant Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company. For the reasons fully articulated herein, we will deny the Motion in it
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015-06-12 · Published · cited 76× · 790 F.3d 487; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 9876; 2015 WL 3634779
OPINION RENDELL, Circuit Judge. In this insurance dispute between appellant Allstate Property & Casualty Insurance Co. (“Allstate”) and appellee Jared Wolfe, we are presented with the question of whether punitive damages awarded against an insured in a personal injury suit are recoverable in a later breach of contract or bad faith suit against the in
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lycoming County · 1998-12-17 · Published · cited 0× · 40 Pa. D. & C.4th 381; 1998 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 9
KIESER, J., This matter is before the court on the defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, filed July 15, 1998.1 The matter came to be heard at oral argument before this court on October 20, 1998. At that time, an order was entered memorializing the parties’ stipulations that: (1) the court shall exercise jurisdiction for purposes of determination of the statute of limitations issue
Craig v. Mnuchinpublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2017-09-29 · Published · cited 3× · 278 F. Supp. 3d 42
MEMORANDUM OPINION Granting in Part and Denying in Part ■ Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff B.B. Craig, an official at the United States Mint (the “Mint”), brings this suit against Steven Mnuchin, in ‘his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Treasury, alleging vio
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014-12-15 · Published · cited 11× · 105 A.3d 1181; 629 Pa. 444; 2014 Pa. LEXIS 3309
OPINION Justice SAYLOR. We accepted certification from a federal appeals court to clarify whether, under Pennsylvania law, an insured may assign the right to recover damages from his insurance company deriving from the insurer’s bad faith toward the insured. In 2007, Jared Wolfe was injured when his vehicle was struck f
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2020-06-01 · Published · cited 4× · 2019 IL App (3d) 180063
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and
Hardin v. Dadlanipublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2016-10-17 · Published · cited 2× · 221 F. Supp. 3d 87; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 187842; 2016 WL 7654693
MEMORANDUM OPINION REGGIE B. WALTON, United States District Judge On January 29, 2016, the plaintiff, Brig-gitta Hardin, received a favorable jury verdict against the defendants, Mick Dadlani (“Dadlani”) and Redime DC, LLC (“Red-line”), including damages totaling $687,000.00. Judgment in a Civil Action (“Judgment”), EOF No. 176. Before the Court are the Defendants’ Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of
District Court, District of Columbia · 2013-02-14 · Published · cited 40× · 924 F. Supp. 2d 74; 90 Fed. R. Serv. 874; 2013 WL 541148; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19711
MEMORANDUM OPINION (Resolving Parties’ Motions in Limine) ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge. I. BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY This case concerns the District of Columbia Department of Corrections’ (“DOC”) practice of overdetaining and strip searching its inmates. The plaintiffs, forme
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012-08-20 · Published · cited 191× · 689 F.3d 584; 89 Fed. R. Serv. 218; 2012 WL 3553291; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 17445; 96 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,598; 115 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1422
OPINION KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-Appellant Gary Daugherty appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendants-Appellees City of Toledo and Toledo’s former Mayor Carlton Finkbeiner (collectively, “the City”) on Daugherty’s Title VII and Ohio state-law race-discrimination claim and the district court’s grant of
District Court, District of Columbia · 2019-12-02 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ANTOINETTE BURNS, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 13-898 (CKK) MATTHEW D. LEVY, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (December 2, 2019) Plaintiff Lt. Col. Antoinette Burns sued Defendants MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and Matt
Tallman v. Aetnapublic domain
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lycoming County · 1987-06-10 · Published · cited 0× · 1 Pa. D. & C.4th 447; 1987 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 24
WOLLET, J., On February 5, 1987, plaintiff fled a complaint seeking a declaratory judgment that a provision in an insurance policy issued by defendant, which prohibits stacking of underinsurance benefits, violates the public policy expressed in the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law. Defendant responded with a demurrer in the form of a preliminary objection *448
District Court, District of Columbia · 2013-11-05 · Published · cited 11× · 20 F. Supp. 3d 74; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 157917; 2013 WL 5912526
MEMORANDUM OPINION BERYL A. HOWELL, United States District Judge The plaintiff, Samuel St. John, filed this employment discrimination action when his superiors decided against promoting him from Acting Director to Permanent Director after observing him for one year functioning in the Acting role. The plaintiff alleges the defendant’s decision
State v. Talleypublic domain
Washington Supreme Court · 2005-03-07 · Published · cited 72× · 858 P.2d 217; 122 Wash. 2d 192
122 Wn.2d 192 (1993) 858 P.2d 217 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Appellant, v. DAVID K. TALLEY, Respondent. THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Appellant, v. DANIEL MYERS, Respondent. THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Appellant, v. BRANDON STEVENS, Respondent. Nos. 58492-3, 58733-7, 58734-5. The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. September 9, 1993.
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-12-10 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CHARLES MATIELLA, Plaintiff, Case No. 21-cv-2112 (GMH) v. MURDOCK STREET LLC, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This action “concerns whether the construction of a condominium building da
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976-11-22 · Published · cited 6× · 369 A.2d 839; 246 Pa. Super. 118; 1976 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2200
246 Pa. Superior Ct. 118 (1976) 369 A.2d 839 Bernard TOMASHEFSKI, Appellant, v. Joanne TOMASHEFSKI. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued December 12, 1975. Decided November 22, 1976. *119 Robert B. Elion, Williamsport, for appellant. No appearance entered nor brief submitted for appellee. B
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-10-23 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 01-15-00210-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS
District Court, D. Delaware · 1983-05-09 · Published · cited 10× · 563 F. Supp. 642; 78 A.L.R. Fed. 365; 38 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 976; 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17085
563 F.Supp. 642 (1983) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. G. HEILEMAN BREWING CO., INC. and Pabst Brewing Company, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 82-750. United States District Court, D. Delaware. May 9, 1983. *643 Anthony V. Nanni, Michael H. Byowitz and Judith N. Batty, Attys., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Antitrust Div., Washington, D