Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Elion v. Auto USA”
Rohe, K. v. Vinson, D. and Felton Weldingpublic domain
OPINION BY GANTMAN, P.J.: Appellant, Kevin A. Rohe, appeals from the judgment entered in the Bradford County Court of Common Pleas, in favor of Appellees, Darris D. Vinson and Fenton Welding Transport, LLC, in this negligence action. We reverse and remand for a new trial. The relevant facts and procedural history of this case
Smerdon v. GEICO Cas. Co.public domain
I. BACKGROUND On April 30, 2016, Ms. Smerdon was shopping at Wal-Mart in Mansfield, Tioga County, Pennsylvania when a robber demanded cash from a customer service employee.1 Ms. Smerdon and several others chased the robber out to the parking lot.2 The robber ran toward his car which he had left running.3 Surveillance foota
Kump v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.public domain
MEMORANDUM MALACHY E. MANNION, District Judge. A fire, theft, and loss of millions of dollars of memorabilia, maps, documents, cash, rare coins, and artwork by the likes of Picasso and Rembrandt are the subject matter of this case. These valuable items were all allegedly owned and maintained by Timothy Kump in his private home. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company covered his residence and these
Wolfe v. Allstate Property & Casualty Insurancepublic domain
MEMORANDUM & ORDER JOHN E. JONES III, District Judge. Presently pending before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Statutory *229Bad Faith and UTPCPL Claims Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) (Doc. 65) of Defendant Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company. For the reasons fully articulated herein, we will deny the Motion in it
Wolfe v. Allstate Property & Casualty Insurancepublic domain
OPINION RENDELL, Circuit Judge. In this insurance dispute between appellant Allstate Property & Casualty Insurance Co. (“Allstate”) and appellee Jared Wolfe, we are presented with the question of whether punitive damages awarded against an insured in a personal injury suit are recoverable in a later breach of contract or bad faith suit against the in
Smith v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.public domain
KIESER, J., This matter is before the court on the defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, filed July 15, 1998.1 The matter came to be heard at oral argument before this court on October 20, 1998. At that time, an order was entered memorializing the parties’ stipulations that: (1) the court shall exercise jurisdiction for purposes of determination of the statute of limitations issue
Craig v. Mnuchinpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION Granting in Part and Denying in Part ■ Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff B.B. Craig, an official at the United States Mint (the “Mint”), brings this suit against Steven Mnuchin, in ‘his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Treasury, alleging vio
Allstate Prop & Casualty Ins Co, Aplt v. Wolfe, J.public domain
OPINION Justice SAYLOR. We accepted certification from a federal appeals court to clarify whether, under Pennsylvania law, an insured may assign the right to recover damages from his insurance company deriving from the insurer’s bad faith toward the insured. In 2007, Jared Wolfe was injured when his vehicle was struck f
BNSF Ry. Co. v. Grohnepublic domain
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and
Hardin v. Dadlanipublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION REGGIE B. WALTON, United States District Judge On January 29, 2016, the plaintiff, Brig-gitta Hardin, received a favorable jury verdict against the defendants, Mick Dadlani (“Dadlani”) and Redime DC, LLC (“Red-line”), including damages totaling $687,000.00. Judgment in a Civil Action (“Judgment”), EOF No. 176. Before the Court are the Defendants’ Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of
Barnes v. District of Columbiapublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION (Resolving Parties’ Motions in Limine) ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge. I. BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY This case concerns the District of Columbia Department of Corrections’ (“DOC”) practice of overdetaining and strip searching its inmates. The plaintiffs, forme
Perlean Griffin v. Carleton Finkbeinerpublic domain
OPINION KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-Appellant Gary Daugherty appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendants-Appellees City of Toledo and Toledo’s former Mayor Carlton Finkbeiner (collectively, “the City”) on Daugherty’s Title VII and Ohio state-law race-discrimination claim and the district court’s grant of
Burns v. Georgetown University Medical Centerpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ANTOINETTE BURNS, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 13-898 (CKK) MATTHEW D. LEVY, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (December 2, 2019) Plaintiff Lt. Col. Antoinette Burns sued Defendants MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and Matt
Tallman v. Aetnapublic domain
WOLLET, J., On February 5, 1987, plaintiff fled a complaint seeking a declaratory judgment that a provision in an insurance policy issued by defendant, which prohibits stacking of underinsurance benefits, violates the public policy expressed in the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law. Defendant responded with a demurrer in the form of a preliminary objection *448
St. John v. Napolitanopublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION BERYL A. HOWELL, United States District Judge The plaintiff, Samuel St. John, filed this employment discrimination action when his superiors decided against promoting him from Acting Director to Permanent Director after observing him for one year functioning in the Acting role. The plaintiff alleges the defendant’s decision
State v. Talleypublic domain
122 Wn.2d 192 (1993) 858 P.2d 217 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Appellant, v. DAVID K. TALLEY, Respondent. THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Appellant, v. DANIEL MYERS, Respondent. THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Appellant, v. BRANDON STEVENS, Respondent. Nos. 58492-3, 58733-7, 58734-5. The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. September 9, 1993.
Matiella v. Murdock Street LLCpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CHARLES MATIELLA, Plaintiff, Case No. 21-cv-2112 (GMH) v. MURDOCK STREET LLC, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This action “concerns whether the construction of a condominium building da
Tomashefski v. Tomashefskipublic domain
246 Pa. Superior Ct. 118 (1976) 369 A.2d 839 Bernard TOMASHEFSKI, Appellant, v. Joanne TOMASHEFSKI. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued December 12, 1975. Decided November 22, 1976. *119 Robert B. Elion, Williamsport, for appellant. No appearance entered nor brief submitted for appellee. B
Francisco Calleja-Ahedo v. Compass Bankpublic domain
ACCEPTED 01-15-00210-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS
United States v. G. Heileman Brewing Co.public domain
563 F.Supp. 642 (1983) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. G. HEILEMAN BREWING CO., INC. and Pabst Brewing Company, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 82-750. United States District Court, D. Delaware. May 9, 1983. *643 Anthony V. Nanni, Michael H. Byowitz and Judith N. Batty, Attys., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Antitrust Div., Washington, D