Cases

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge PROST. Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge REYNA. PROST, Circuit Judge. Raylon, LLC (“Raylon”) brought three suits against, inter alia, Complus Data Innovations, Inc. (“Complus”), Casio America, Inc. and Casio Computer Co., Ltd., (collectively “Casio”), and Symbol Technologies, Inc, (“Symbol”) (collectively, “defendants”) in the Eastern District of Texas

FLAUM, Circuit Judge. Fidlar Technologies (“Fidlar”) brings this action against LPS Real Estate Data Solutions, Inc. (“LPS”) for violations of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (“CFAA”) and the Illinois Computer Crime Preven*1077tion Law (“CCPL”). Fidlar claims that LPS improperly downloaded county land records provided through Fidlar’s services. The district court

ORDER SARA DARROW, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Fidlar Technologies (“Fidlar”) sued LPS Real Estate Data Solutions, Inc. (“LPS”) under the civil-suit provision of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (“CFAA”), 18 U.S.C. § 1030(g), and under the civil-suit provision the Illinois Computer Crime Prevention Law (“CCPL”), 720 ILCS 5/17-51 (2011). Fidlar also alleged a common law trespass to chattels claim.

742 F.2d 1520 239 U.S.App.D.C. 367 ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, Data General Corporation, ElectronicMemories & Magnetics Corporation, Hewlett-Packard Co., IntelCorporation, Mostek Corporation, National SemiconductorCorporation, RCA Corporation, Rockwell International andSignetics Corporation, Petitioners,v.CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent,Flying Tiger Line, Inc., Intervenor.ADVANCED MIC

STEPHENS, Judge. Procedural History and Factual Background This appeal raises the issue of whether the Automated Criminal/ Infraction System database (“ACIS”) is subject to public disclosure under the North Carolina Public Records Act, N.C. Gen. Stat. § 132-1 et seq. (“the Act”). In its order dismissing the matter on the ple

503 F.Supp.2d 1152 (2007) QUANTRONIX, INC., a Utah corporation, Plaintiff, v. DATA TRAK TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Minnesota corporation; Data Trak Solutions NA, Inc., a Minnesota corporation; Wildwood Technology, LLC, a Minnesota Limited Liability Company; Robert Tessier, an individual; and Michael Everson, an individual; Defendants. Civil No. 07-1799 (DWF/AJB). United States District Court, D. Minnesota.<

536 F.Supp.2d 1039 (2008) QUANTRONIX, INC., a Utah corporation, Plaintiff, v. DATA TRAK TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Minnesota corporation; Data Trak Solutions NA, Inc., a Minnesota corporation; Wildwood Technology, LLC, a Minnesota Limited Liability Company; Robert Tessier, an individual; and Michael Everson, an individ-Pal; Defendants. Civil No. 07-1799 (DWF/AJB). United States District Court, D. Minnesota.

408 F.Supp.2d 1338 (2005) FORMER EMPLOYEES OF ELECTRONIC DATA SYSTEMS CORP., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF LABOR, Defendant. Slip Op. 05-148. Court No. 03-00373. United States Court of International Trade. November 14, 2005. *1339 Yormick & Associates Co. (Jon P. Yormick), Cleveland, OH, for Plaintiffs. Pet

MOORE, Circuit Judge. Appellant Centillion Data Systems, LLC (Centillion) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment that Qwest Communications International, Inc., Qwest Corporation, and Qwest Communications Corporation (Qwest, collectively) do not infringe the claims of U.S. patent no. 5,287,-270 ('270 patent). Qwest cross-appeals the district court’s grant of summa

350 F.Supp.2d 1282 (2004) FORMER EMPLOYEES OF ELECTRONIC DATA SYSTEMS CORP., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF LABOR, Defendant SLIP OP. 04-151, Court No. 03-00373. United States Court of International Trade. December 1, 2004. *1283 Yormick & Associates Co., (Jon P. Yormick) for Plaintiffs. Peter D. Keisler, As

751 F.Supp. 680 (1990) Janis COX, Plaintiff, v. ELECTRONIC DATA SYSTEMS CORPORATION, a Texas corporation, Defendant. No. 89-CV-73557-DT. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, S.D. November 13, 1990. *681 *682 Donald J. Gasiorek, Southfield, Mich., for plaintiff. Martin T. Wymer,

21 Cal.Rptr.3d 532 (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 762 TOSHIBA AMERICA ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS, INC., Petitioner, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of Santa Clara County, Respondent; Lexar Media, Inc., Real Party in Interest. No. H027029. Court of Appeal, Sixth District. December 3, 2004. *535 Morrison & Foerster, Michae

691 F.Supp.2d 538 (2010) ST. CLAIR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CONSULTANTS, INC., Plaintiff, v. MATSUSHITA ELECTRONIC INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD., et al., Defendants. St. Clair Intellectual Property Consultants, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Verizon Communications, Inc., et al., Defendants. St. Clair Intellectual Property Consultants, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Palm, Inc., et al., Defendants. St. Clair Intellectual Property Consultants, Inc., Plain

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit __________________________ CENTILLION DATA SYSTEMS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. QWEST COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC., QWEST CORPORATION, AND QWEST COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, Defendants-Cross Appellants. __________________________ 2010-1110, -1131 __________________________ Appeals fr

(2008) CENTILLION DATA SYSTEMS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. CONVERGYS CORPORATION, Qwest Communications International, Inc., and Qwest Corporation, Defendants, Qwest Corporation and Qwest Communications Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. Centillion Data Systems, LLC, and CTI Group (Holdings), Inc., Defendants. No. 1:04-cv-00073-LJM-WTL. United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division.

529 F.Supp.2d 982 (2008) CENTILLION DATA SYSTEMS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. CONVERGYS CORPORATION, Qwest Communications International, Inc., and Qwest Corporation, Defendants, Qwest Corporation and Qwest Communications Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. Centillion Data Systems, LLC, and CTI Group (Holdings), Inc., Defendants. No. 1:04-cv-00073-LJM-WTL. United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianap

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 511 OPINION Plaintiffs (a class of founding shareholders represented by William W. Crain) appeal from a judgment on the pleadings entered in favor of defendants. The judgment — which resulted in the dismissal of *Page 512 plaintiffs' complaint with prejudice

452 F.Supp. 1262 (1978) DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION v. ELECTRONIC MEMORIES & MAGNETICS CORP. Civ. A. No. 77-1580-F. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. June 12, 1978. *1263 George A. Herbster, Martin J. O'Donnell, Cesari & McKenna, Robert A. Cesari, Boston, Mass., for plaintiff. Arthur Freilich, Linde

WALLACH, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I disagree with the majority's decision to reverse the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York ("District Court")'s award of attorney fees pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1927 (2012).1 The Second Circuit reviews a district court's award of

Chen, Circuit Judge. U.S. Bancorp and its affiliate Elavon, Inc. (collectively, U.S. Bank) appeal orders in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota (1) denying U.S. Bank's motion for summary judgment that claims 1-5 of U.S. Patent No. 8,311,945